Attenuation measurements on non-contrast-enhanced CT brain: a re-visit of their role in the diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1007/s11604-025-01746-0
Ahmed Abdrabou, Ahmed M Osman, Noha M Taha, Eman A F Darwish
{"title":"Attenuation measurements on non-contrast-enhanced CT brain: a re-visit of their role in the diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis.","authors":"Ahmed Abdrabou, Ahmed M Osman, Noha M Taha, Eman A F Darwish","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01746-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the diagnostic merit of using quantitative imaging parameters measured on non-contrast CT (NCCT) in the diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>43 patients with CVT and 30 age and sex-matched controls were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently assessed the NCCT scans for direct and indirect signs of CVT. Absolute attenuation values of thrombosed and non-thrombosed sinuses were measured and the ratio of sinus attenuation to patient's hematocrit (H/H ratio) was calculated for each case. The attenuation value of the internal carotid artery was also measured to calculate the veno-arterial (V/A) difference. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated and all measurements were compared between patient and control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sensitivity and specificity of the dense sinus sign for diagnosis of CVT ranged from 72 to 79% and from 83 to 87% respectively. Sinus attenuation, H/H ratio and V/A difference were significantly higher in the CVT group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). An attenuation threshold value of > 55 HU yielded a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 90% and had the largest AUC of 0.89 (95%CI 0.795-0.951) among all stand-alone parameters, while the combination of an attenuation value greater than 55, or a V/A difference greater than 22, yielded the best diagnostic performance among all the parameters with sensitivity and specificity at values of 86% and a 100% respectively and an AUC of 0.93 (95%CI 0.846 to 0.977).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the analysis of quantitative parameters resulted in a notable upgrade in the accuracy of the diagnosis of CVT over visual inspection alone. Their high specificities make them reliable markers of CVT, yet their relatively lower sensitivities may indicate a need to perform further studies to safely eliminate the possibility of CVT in highly suspicious cases.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>FMASU R 10/2020/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"940-948"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12125052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01746-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the diagnostic merit of using quantitative imaging parameters measured on non-contrast CT (NCCT) in the diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).

Materials and methods: 43 patients with CVT and 30 age and sex-matched controls were enrolled in this retrospective study. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently assessed the NCCT scans for direct and indirect signs of CVT. Absolute attenuation values of thrombosed and non-thrombosed sinuses were measured and the ratio of sinus attenuation to patient's hematocrit (H/H ratio) was calculated for each case. The attenuation value of the internal carotid artery was also measured to calculate the veno-arterial (V/A) difference. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated and all measurements were compared between patient and control groups.

Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the dense sinus sign for diagnosis of CVT ranged from 72 to 79% and from 83 to 87% respectively. Sinus attenuation, H/H ratio and V/A difference were significantly higher in the CVT group than in the control group (P < 0.0001). An attenuation threshold value of > 55 HU yielded a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 90% and had the largest AUC of 0.89 (95%CI 0.795-0.951) among all stand-alone parameters, while the combination of an attenuation value greater than 55, or a V/A difference greater than 22, yielded the best diagnostic performance among all the parameters with sensitivity and specificity at values of 86% and a 100% respectively and an AUC of 0.93 (95%CI 0.846 to 0.977).

Conclusions: Overall, the analysis of quantitative parameters resulted in a notable upgrade in the accuracy of the diagnosis of CVT over visual inspection alone. Their high specificities make them reliable markers of CVT, yet their relatively lower sensitivities may indicate a need to perform further studies to safely eliminate the possibility of CVT in highly suspicious cases.

Trial registration number: FMASU R 10/2020/2021.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非增强CT脑的衰减测量:对其在脑静脉血栓诊断中的作用的重新审视。
目的:探讨非对比CT (NCCT)定量成像参数在脑静脉血栓(CVT)诊断中的价值。材料和方法:回顾性研究43例CVT患者和30例年龄和性别匹配的对照组。两名盲法神经放射学家独立评估了NCCT扫描的直接和间接CVT征象。测量血栓形成和非血栓形成的鼻窦的绝对衰减值,并计算鼻窦衰减与患者红细胞压积的比值(H/H比)。测量颈内动脉的衰减值,计算静脉-动脉(V/A)差值。评估读者之间的一致性,并比较患者组和对照组之间的所有测量值。结果:致密窦征诊断CVT的敏感性为72 ~ 79%,特异性为83 ~ 87%。CVT组鼻窦衰减、H/H比、V/A差值均显著高于对照组(p55 HU的敏感性为86%,特异性为90%,在所有独立参数中AUC最大,为0.89 (95%CI 0.795 ~ 0.951),而衰减值大于55,或V/A差值大于22的组合;诊断效果最佳,敏感性为86%,特异性为100%,AUC为0.93 (95%CI 0.846 ~ 0.977)。结论:总体而言,定量参数的分析导致CVT诊断的准确性显著提高,而不是单纯的视觉检查。它们的高特异性使其成为CVT的可靠标记物,但它们相对较低的敏感性可能表明需要进行进一步的研究,以安全地消除高度可疑病例CVT的可能性。试验注册号:FMASU R 10/2020/2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Additional diagnostic value of lesion visibility on diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating BI-RADS category 4 MRI-detected breast lesions. Feasibility study of streamlining radioembolization with yttrium-90 resin microspheres without lung shunt fraction measurement for colorectal liver metastasis < 7 cm. The letter to editor regarding "CT-based assessment of bear-inflicted maxillofacial injuries: evaluation using the facial injury severity scale and its association with hospitalization duration". AI achieves board-level performance on the Japan diagnostic radiology board examination through direct image interpretation. Artificial superintelligence alignment in healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1