The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on the inflammatory response in septic shock: a secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Experimental Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s40635-025-00725-z
Andrea Sauer, Klaus Stahl, Benjamin Seeliger, Pedro David Wendel-Garcia, Felix Lehmann, Julius J Schmidt, Bernhard M W Schmidt, Tobias Welte, Konrad Peukert, Lennart Wild, Christian Putensen, Sascha David, Christian Bode
{"title":"The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on the inflammatory response in septic shock: a secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial.","authors":"Andrea Sauer, Klaus Stahl, Benjamin Seeliger, Pedro David Wendel-Garcia, Felix Lehmann, Julius J Schmidt, Bernhard M W Schmidt, Tobias Welte, Konrad Peukert, Lennart Wild, Christian Putensen, Sascha David, Christian Bode","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00725-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis and septic shock, defined by a profound immune dysregulation, are among the leading causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite advances in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, evidence for specific immunomodulatory treatment does not exist to date. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) represents an adjunctive treatment approach to rebalance immune homeostasis. In the EXCHANGE-1 trial, we recently demonstrated a rapid hemodynamic improvement, possibly caused by the removal of harmful mediators and the replacement of protective plasma proteins. The aim of this secondary analysis is to further characterize the underlying immunomodulatory effects and to identify biomarkers that may predict treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis included patients in early septic shock (< 24 h duration) and a norepinephrine (NE) dose of ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC + one single TPE and plasma samples were collected before and after TPE. Within-group and between group effects of circulating levels of acute-phase proteins [CRP and Pentraxin3 (PTX3)], inflammatory mediators (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-2Rα/CD25) and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) [cell-free DNA (cfDNA)] were analyzed via paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a mixed-effects model. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling of NE and lactate reduction was performed to investigate if cfDNA could be associated with treatment response to TPE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TPE led to a significant reduction in circulating acute-phase protein levels (CRP p = 0.00976, PTX3 p = 0.0001). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as circulating TNF-α-, IL-6- und IL-8-levels, were significantly reduced in both groups with no significant difference between treatment groups except for IL-2Rα/CD25 (p ≤ 0.0001). In a multivariate mixed-effects model, rising cfDNA levels over the first 6 h indicated refractoriness to SOC treatment regarding NE (p = 0.004) and lactate (p = 0.001), whereas those receiving TPE demonstrated sustained reductions in both parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial adjunctive TPE is associated with the reduction of acute-phase proteins and IL-2Rα/CD25, however not with the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This phenomenon could contribute to the observed enhancement in hemodynamics among patients with septic shock. Furthermore, TPE may be particularly beneficial for patients with septic shock who exhibit rising levels of cfDNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00725-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis and septic shock, defined by a profound immune dysregulation, are among the leading causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Despite advances in understanding the underlying pathophysiology, evidence for specific immunomodulatory treatment does not exist to date. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) represents an adjunctive treatment approach to rebalance immune homeostasis. In the EXCHANGE-1 trial, we recently demonstrated a rapid hemodynamic improvement, possibly caused by the removal of harmful mediators and the replacement of protective plasma proteins. The aim of this secondary analysis is to further characterize the underlying immunomodulatory effects and to identify biomarkers that may predict treatment response.

Methods: This secondary analysis included patients in early septic shock (< 24 h duration) and a norepinephrine (NE) dose of ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC + one single TPE and plasma samples were collected before and after TPE. Within-group and between group effects of circulating levels of acute-phase proteins [CRP and Pentraxin3 (PTX3)], inflammatory mediators (IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-2Rα/CD25) and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) [cell-free DNA (cfDNA)] were analyzed via paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a mixed-effects model. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling of NE and lactate reduction was performed to investigate if cfDNA could be associated with treatment response to TPE.

Results: TPE led to a significant reduction in circulating acute-phase protein levels (CRP p = 0.00976, PTX3 p = 0.0001). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as circulating TNF-α-, IL-6- und IL-8-levels, were significantly reduced in both groups with no significant difference between treatment groups except for IL-2Rα/CD25 (p ≤ 0.0001). In a multivariate mixed-effects model, rising cfDNA levels over the first 6 h indicated refractoriness to SOC treatment regarding NE (p = 0.004) and lactate (p = 0.001), whereas those receiving TPE demonstrated sustained reductions in both parameters.

Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial adjunctive TPE is associated with the reduction of acute-phase proteins and IL-2Rα/CD25, however not with the reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This phenomenon could contribute to the observed enhancement in hemodynamics among patients with septic shock. Furthermore, TPE may be particularly beneficial for patients with septic shock who exhibit rising levels of cfDNA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interaction between clock genes, melatonin and cardiovascular outcomes from ICU patients. The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on the inflammatory response in septic shock: a secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial. Quantification of facial cues for acute illness: a systematic scoping review. Patient-ventilator synchrony under non-invasive ventilation is improved by an automated real time waveform analysis algorithm: a bench study. Can nebulised heparin reduce acute lung injury in patients with SARS‑CoV‑2 requiring advanced respiratory support in Ireland: the CHARTER‑Ireland phase Ib/IIa, randomised, parallel-group, open-label study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1