The power of peers: Design-based research on stimulating peer-assisted learning for enhancing the clinical-reasoning learning process in the workplace.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/medu.15613
Larissa I A Ruczynski, Bas J J W Schouwenberg, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Marjolein H J van de Pol
{"title":"The power of peers: Design-based research on stimulating peer-assisted learning for enhancing the clinical-reasoning learning process in the workplace.","authors":"Larissa I A Ruczynski, Bas J J W Schouwenberg, Cornelia R M G Fluit, Marjolein H J van de Pol","doi":"10.1111/medu.15613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, and collaborative learning is gaining momentum. Unfortunately, literature shows that students utilise their peers less during undergraduate clerkships, a phase when PAL is known to be particularly useful to students and their clinical-reasoning learning process. For this reason, we investigated the following question: How can we design a workplace for undergraduate students that fosters PAL with regard to enhancing their clinical-reasoning learning practice?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a design-based research (DBR) methodology, involving iterative development to address a complex educational issue. Between September 2022 and October 2023, stakeholders participated in four work conferences (WCs). The final output consists of design principles for a workplace to encourage PAL for the enhancement of the clinical-reasoning learning practice for undergraduate students, as well as an evaluated 2-month pilot intervention, 'paired consultation', that aligns with these design principles. This study is conducted in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 individuals participated in this study. In the WCs, design principles were continuously discussed, while an intervention was developed under the guidance of the research group. Discussion topics included reciprocal vulnerability, culture, autonomy, flexibility, ownership, psychological safety, competition and the role of supervisors. Overall, the pilot was considered a success by all involved and small adjustments were made throughout. Students mentioned that observing peers supported their clinical-reasoning learning process. Supervisors expressed growing enthusiasm for PAL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To ensure successful interventions based on the design principles, three topics deserve attention: (1) Students must share responsibility for learning with peers, (2) supervisors must contribute to the evolution towards a collaborative learning environment and (3) a community of learners within a community of practice can enhance the collaborative learning practice. Further research should focus on guiding the workplace in this transition towards collaborative learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15613","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, and collaborative learning is gaining momentum. Unfortunately, literature shows that students utilise their peers less during undergraduate clerkships, a phase when PAL is known to be particularly useful to students and their clinical-reasoning learning process. For this reason, we investigated the following question: How can we design a workplace for undergraduate students that fosters PAL with regard to enhancing their clinical-reasoning learning practice?

Methods: We used a design-based research (DBR) methodology, involving iterative development to address a complex educational issue. Between September 2022 and October 2023, stakeholders participated in four work conferences (WCs). The final output consists of design principles for a workplace to encourage PAL for the enhancement of the clinical-reasoning learning practice for undergraduate students, as well as an evaluated 2-month pilot intervention, 'paired consultation', that aligns with these design principles. This study is conducted in the Netherlands.

Results: A total of 101 individuals participated in this study. In the WCs, design principles were continuously discussed, while an intervention was developed under the guidance of the research group. Discussion topics included reciprocal vulnerability, culture, autonomy, flexibility, ownership, psychological safety, competition and the role of supervisors. Overall, the pilot was considered a success by all involved and small adjustments were made throughout. Students mentioned that observing peers supported their clinical-reasoning learning process. Supervisors expressed growing enthusiasm for PAL.

Conclusion: To ensure successful interventions based on the design principles, three topics deserve attention: (1) Students must share responsibility for learning with peers, (2) supervisors must contribute to the evolution towards a collaborative learning environment and (3) a community of learners within a community of practice can enhance the collaborative learning practice. Further research should focus on guiding the workplace in this transition towards collaborative learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
The power of peers: Design-based research on stimulating peer-assisted learning for enhancing the clinical-reasoning learning process in the workplace. Experiences of medical students and doctors with dyslexia: A systematic review. Under the radar: How participating in a student organization can shape medical students' professional identity. Guiding medical trainees' workplace learning for interprofessional collaboration-Looking to physicians or seeing nurses? Enhancing diversity in medical education: Bridging gaps and building inclusive curricula.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1