Teachers Burnout Affective and Motivational Profiles: Their Impact on Teachers' Stress, Anxiety and Depression Levels.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1177/00332941251320026
Spiridon Kamtsios, Vasilis Kakouris
{"title":"Teachers Burnout Affective and Motivational Profiles: Their Impact on Teachers' Stress, Anxiety and Depression Levels.","authors":"Spiridon Kamtsios, Vasilis Kakouris","doi":"10.1177/00332941251320026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aims at investigating teachers' burnout, motivational and affective profiles. Moreover, the study explores differences in stress, anxiety and depression levels among teachers' profiles. The sample comprised of 816 participants who completed the following scales: (a) \"Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey\", (b) Passion Scale\", (c) \"Positive and Negative Affect scale\" and (d) DASS-21. A clustering approach through latent profile analysis revealed four teachers' profiles: 1. Workaholics (18.25%), 2. Moderate Burnout (28.67%), 3. Normal Workers (42.15%) and 4. Extreme Burnout (10.90%). The study also revealed differences between the profiles in terms of teachers' stress, anxiety and depression levels. The third profile (Normal Workers) showed the lowest levels in all three variables, followed by the first profile (Workaholics). The second profile (Moderate Burnout) showed relatively high levels and the fourth profile (Extreme Burnout) the highest stress, anxiety and depression levels. Through multinomial logistic regression, discriminant analysis and the decision tree, depression and stress emerged as predictive/differentiating factors for the inclusion of participants in the profiles, with an accuracy around 55%. The distinction between teachers profiles' will facilitate the recognition of teachers already experiencing burnout or at high risk (Extreme and Moderate Burnout profiles), so that they receive first-line therapeutic interventions while teachers belonging to the more adaptive profiles (Workaholics and Normal Workers) could benefit more from prevention-oriented programs. These programs can be utilized by school psychologists and policy makers in school contexts aiming at reducing dysphoric burnout emotions on a therapeutic level and raising awareness informing and psychoeducating on a preventive level.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251320026"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251320026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims at investigating teachers' burnout, motivational and affective profiles. Moreover, the study explores differences in stress, anxiety and depression levels among teachers' profiles. The sample comprised of 816 participants who completed the following scales: (a) "Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey", (b) Passion Scale", (c) "Positive and Negative Affect scale" and (d) DASS-21. A clustering approach through latent profile analysis revealed four teachers' profiles: 1. Workaholics (18.25%), 2. Moderate Burnout (28.67%), 3. Normal Workers (42.15%) and 4. Extreme Burnout (10.90%). The study also revealed differences between the profiles in terms of teachers' stress, anxiety and depression levels. The third profile (Normal Workers) showed the lowest levels in all three variables, followed by the first profile (Workaholics). The second profile (Moderate Burnout) showed relatively high levels and the fourth profile (Extreme Burnout) the highest stress, anxiety and depression levels. Through multinomial logistic regression, discriminant analysis and the decision tree, depression and stress emerged as predictive/differentiating factors for the inclusion of participants in the profiles, with an accuracy around 55%. The distinction between teachers profiles' will facilitate the recognition of teachers already experiencing burnout or at high risk (Extreme and Moderate Burnout profiles), so that they receive first-line therapeutic interventions while teachers belonging to the more adaptive profiles (Workaholics and Normal Workers) could benefit more from prevention-oriented programs. These programs can be utilized by school psychologists and policy makers in school contexts aiming at reducing dysphoric burnout emotions on a therapeutic level and raising awareness informing and psychoeducating on a preventive level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师职业倦怠、情感和动机特征:对教师压力、焦虑和抑郁水平的影响。
本研究旨在探讨教师的职业倦怠、动机和情感特征。此外,研究还探讨了不同教师在压力、焦虑和抑郁水平上的差异。样本由816名参与者组成,他们完成了以下量表:(a)“Maslach职业倦怠量表-教育者调查”,(b)激情量表,(c)“积极和消极影响量表”和(d) DASS-21。通过聚类分析,发现了四种教师的潜在特征:1。1 .工作狂(18.25%);2 .中度倦怠(28.67%);普通职工占42.15%;极度倦怠(10.90%)。该研究还揭示了教师在压力、焦虑和抑郁水平方面的差异。第三种情况(普通工人)在所有三个变量中表现最低,其次是第一种情况(工作狂)。第二种类型(中度职业倦怠)表现出相对较高的水平,第四种类型(极度职业倦怠)表现出最高的压力、焦虑和抑郁水平。通过多项逻辑回归、判别分析和决策树,抑郁和压力作为预测/区分因素出现在参与者的档案中,准确率约为55%。教师类型之间的区别将有助于识别已经经历过职业倦怠或处于高风险的教师(极端和中度职业倦怠),以便他们接受一线治疗干预,而属于更适应类型的教师(工作狂和普通工人)可以从以预防为导向的项目中受益更多。这些项目可以被学校心理学家和政策制定者利用,目的是在治疗层面上减少烦躁的倦怠情绪,在预防层面上提高意识,告知和心理教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Theory of Employee Planned Behavior: Job Satisfaction as a Key to Organizational Performance. Pandemic Stress and Cyberbullying Among Adolescents During China's Outbreak of Omicron: Examining the Roles of Perceived Safety and Family Cohesion. A Combined Kundalini Yoga and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Pilot Study. Adapting to the Evolving Digital Landscape: Development and Validation of the VirtHuLab Self Efficacy Scale. Perceived Social Support and Connectedness in Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1