Cut-off matters in the interpretation of myositis antibodies by line immunoassay.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keaf101
Xiumei Wei, James Yun, Jianna He, Allan Sturgess
{"title":"Cut-off matters in the interpretation of myositis antibodies by line immunoassay.","authors":"Xiumei Wei, James Yun, Jianna He, Allan Sturgess","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keaf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the performance of a commercial line immunoassay (LIA) in cohorts of healthy controls (HC), disease controls (DC) and patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and investigate whether different cut-offs would enhance the accuracy of myositis antibodies (MAs) by LIA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sera from patients with positive MAs (n = 118), DC (n = 124) and HC (n = 60), were analysed for MAs using EUROLINE Myopathies 16 Ag LIA (EUROIMMUN).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The newly established MAs cut-offs resulted in significantly lower both false-positive and multiple positive rates compared with the manufacturer's single cut-off, from 36.7% to 5.0% and 7.2% to 1.1% in controls, and 45.8% to 23.8% and 23.7% to 15.5% in patients with positive MAs cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the positive predictive value (PPV) of MAs for IIMs or interstitial lung disease (ILD) increased significantly from 47.5% to 66.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Establishment of local cut-offs and cross-reference ANA findings can significantly enhance the assay's performance and increase the confidence in interpreting MAs results by LIA. It is important to be aware of the low PPV for most MAs in real-world cohorts; thus, the investigation of MAs should be approached as confirmatory or differential diagnosis rather than a screening tool in IIMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"4364-4370"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a commercial line immunoassay (LIA) in cohorts of healthy controls (HC), disease controls (DC) and patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and investigate whether different cut-offs would enhance the accuracy of myositis antibodies (MAs) by LIA.

Methods: Sera from patients with positive MAs (n = 118), DC (n = 124) and HC (n = 60), were analysed for MAs using EUROLINE Myopathies 16 Ag LIA (EUROIMMUN).

Results: The newly established MAs cut-offs resulted in significantly lower both false-positive and multiple positive rates compared with the manufacturer's single cut-off, from 36.7% to 5.0% and 7.2% to 1.1% in controls, and 45.8% to 23.8% and 23.7% to 15.5% in patients with positive MAs cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the positive predictive value (PPV) of MAs for IIMs or interstitial lung disease (ILD) increased significantly from 47.5% to 66.7%.

Conclusion: Establishment of local cut-offs and cross-reference ANA findings can significantly enhance the assay's performance and increase the confidence in interpreting MAs results by LIA. It is important to be aware of the low PPV for most MAs in real-world cohorts; thus, the investigation of MAs should be approached as confirmatory or differential diagnosis rather than a screening tool in IIMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
切断事项在解释肌炎抗体的线免疫测定。
目的:评估商业系免疫测定(LIA)在健康对照(HC)、疾病对照(DC)和特发性炎性肌病(IIMs)患者队列中的表现,并探讨不同的截止点是否会提高LIA检测肌炎抗体(MAs)的准确性。方法:采用EUROLINE Myopathies 16 Ag LIA (EUROIMMUN)对MAs阳性(118例)、DC(124例)和HC(60例)患者的血清进行MAs检测。结果:与制造商的单一截止值相比,新建立的MAs截止值导致假阳性和多重阳性率显著降低,在对照组中分别从36.7%降至5.0%和7.2%降至1.1%,在MAs阳性患者队列中分别从45.8%降至23.8%和23.7%降至15.5%。此外,MAs对iim或间质性肺疾病(ILD)的阳性预测值(PPV)从47.5%显著增加到66.7%。结论:建立局部截断点和交叉参考ANA结果可以显著提高分析的性能,并增加LIA解释MAs结果的可信度。重要的是要意识到现实世界中大多数MAs的低PPV,因此,对MAs的调查应作为确诊或鉴别诊断,而不是作为IIMs的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
期刊最新文献
Humoral responses against high-density lipoprotein are linked to unfavorable lipid and proteomic signatures in primary Sjögren disease-a multi-platform approach. Predicting DMARD tapering success in rheumatoid arthritis: are we considering what matters to patients? Harlequin syndrome: segmental autonomic dysfunction in the realm of Sjogren's disease. Comment on: Effect of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on risk of depression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis a nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study. Secukinumab-induced hepatitis and renal vasculitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1