Endoscopic radial incision combined with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for refractory esophageal stenosis after endoscopy submucosal dissection.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1007/s13304-025-02069-5
Hoi-Ioi Ng, Yi Liu, Yong Liu, Li-Zhou Dou, Shun He, Gui-Qi Wang
{"title":"Endoscopic radial incision combined with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for refractory esophageal stenosis after endoscopy submucosal dissection.","authors":"Hoi-Ioi Ng, Yi Liu, Yong Liu, Li-Zhou Dou, Shun He, Gui-Qi Wang","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02069-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Refractory esophageal stenosis (RES) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic radial incision (ERI) combined with the local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for RES and to assess its safety and efficacy. A total of nine patients (five males; age range: 50-76 years) who underwent ERI + triamcinolone acetonide for RES after ESD between August 2019 and November 2022 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the duration of treatment. The length of the stenosed portion, procedure time, sessions of endoscopic therapy, effectiveness rate, success rate, dysphagia grade, complications, and quality of scores were also analyzed. The effectiveness and success rates were 100% and 88.9%, respectively. The mean number of sessions of ERI + triamcinolone acetonide was 2.2 (1.0-4.0). The mean procedure time was 25.9 ± 3.8 min. No severe complications, including bleeding or perforation, were observed during the perioperative period. Dysphagia symptoms were relieved in all patients after endoscopic treatment. Patients had significantly better functional scales for social functioning and global health status and lower rates of fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and financial difficulties after treatment. ERI + triamcinolone acetonide can be considered a safe and effective treatment for RES after ESD. Larger prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02069-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Refractory esophageal stenosis (RES) after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic radial incision (ERI) combined with the local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for RES and to assess its safety and efficacy. A total of nine patients (five males; age range: 50-76 years) who underwent ERI + triamcinolone acetonide for RES after ESD between August 2019 and November 2022 were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the duration of treatment. The length of the stenosed portion, procedure time, sessions of endoscopic therapy, effectiveness rate, success rate, dysphagia grade, complications, and quality of scores were also analyzed. The effectiveness and success rates were 100% and 88.9%, respectively. The mean number of sessions of ERI + triamcinolone acetonide was 2.2 (1.0-4.0). The mean procedure time was 25.9 ± 3.8 min. No severe complications, including bleeding or perforation, were observed during the perioperative period. Dysphagia symptoms were relieved in all patients after endoscopic treatment. Patients had significantly better functional scales for social functioning and global health status and lower rates of fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and financial difficulties after treatment. ERI + triamcinolone acetonide can be considered a safe and effective treatment for RES after ESD. Larger prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Implications of robotic platforms for repeat hepatectomies: a propensity score matched study of clinical outcomes. Endoscopic radial incision combined with local injection of triamcinolone acetonide for refractory esophageal stenosis after endoscopy submucosal dissection. All that glisters is not gold. Comment to: Immediate repair of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroid surgery via a tension-free end-to-side anastomosis with the Vagus. Omental patch as prevention for bile leak in patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy: a propensity score analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1