Effects of productive safety net program on children's nutritional outcomes in Ethiopia: a systematic review without meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMC Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s40795-025-01021-5
Abdu Oumer, Muluken Yigezu, Milkiyas Solomon Getachew, Berhanu Abebaw Mekonnen
{"title":"Effects of productive safety net program on children's nutritional outcomes in Ethiopia: a systematic review without meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdu Oumer, Muluken Yigezu, Milkiyas Solomon Getachew, Berhanu Abebaw Mekonnen","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01021-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) is a livelihood intervention to improve food insecurity among the poor and has been implemented in Ethiopia. However, there is inconsistent evidence on the impacts of PSNP on improving the nutritional status of vulnerable segments (children). The current review was to synthesize evidence on the effects of PSNP on the nutritional status of children in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search for Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, and other relevant repositories, coupled with a manual search (till March 15, 2024), was done using a combination of relevant key words. Hence, the search was conducted on \"productive safety net,\" \"Ethiopia,\" \"nutritional status,\" and \"undernutrition.\" An updated systematic review without meta-analysis guideline was used to select relevant literature. Data were extracted using MS Excel format by two reviewers and cross-checked. The extracted data were grouped, and summarized in narrative summaries, descriptions, and quantitative summaries whenever applicable. The risk of bias was assessed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess the strength of the evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine studies (n = 14,114) were included in this review, and the studies assessed the risk of undernutrition among PSNP members and non-PSNP members, in the form of pre- and post-design, survey, and cohort studies. The program has the potential to improve income, food security, dietary diversity, and reduce the occurrence of acute malnutrition, with a limited effect on stunting reduction. Moreover, food aid or cash transfer plus food aid was found to be superior compared to cash transfer mode in improving child nutrition than cash transfer alone, which could be frustrated by food inflation, subjects' knowledge and attitude about child feeding. Overall, evidence from survey studies reporting the comparative risk of undernutrition could limit the conclusiveness of the causation which could be confounded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSNP could improve wasting with limited evidence on stunting reduction, where the causal pathway could be frustrated by the purchasing power of cash vouchers, household income expenditure patterns, and subjects' knowledge and attitude limiting its impact. Well-designed implementation research could further help. A comprehensive review, considering more recent evidence, could help.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01021-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Productive Safety Net Program (PSNP) is a livelihood intervention to improve food insecurity among the poor and has been implemented in Ethiopia. However, there is inconsistent evidence on the impacts of PSNP on improving the nutritional status of vulnerable segments (children). The current review was to synthesize evidence on the effects of PSNP on the nutritional status of children in Ethiopia.

Methods: A comprehensive search for Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, and other relevant repositories, coupled with a manual search (till March 15, 2024), was done using a combination of relevant key words. Hence, the search was conducted on "productive safety net," "Ethiopia," "nutritional status," and "undernutrition." An updated systematic review without meta-analysis guideline was used to select relevant literature. Data were extracted using MS Excel format by two reviewers and cross-checked. The extracted data were grouped, and summarized in narrative summaries, descriptions, and quantitative summaries whenever applicable. The risk of bias was assessed, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to assess the strength of the evidence.

Results: A total of nine studies (n = 14,114) were included in this review, and the studies assessed the risk of undernutrition among PSNP members and non-PSNP members, in the form of pre- and post-design, survey, and cohort studies. The program has the potential to improve income, food security, dietary diversity, and reduce the occurrence of acute malnutrition, with a limited effect on stunting reduction. Moreover, food aid or cash transfer plus food aid was found to be superior compared to cash transfer mode in improving child nutrition than cash transfer alone, which could be frustrated by food inflation, subjects' knowledge and attitude about child feeding. Overall, evidence from survey studies reporting the comparative risk of undernutrition could limit the conclusiveness of the causation which could be confounded.

Conclusion: PSNP could improve wasting with limited evidence on stunting reduction, where the causal pathway could be frustrated by the purchasing power of cash vouchers, household income expenditure patterns, and subjects' knowledge and attitude limiting its impact. Well-designed implementation research could further help. A comprehensive review, considering more recent evidence, could help.

Clinical trial registration: Not applicable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产安全网计划对埃塞俄比亚儿童营养结果的影响:一项没有荟萃分析的系统回顾。
背景:生产安全网计划(PSNP)是一项旨在改善贫困人口粮食不安全状况的生计干预措施,已在埃塞俄比亚实施。然而,关于PSNP对改善弱势群体(儿童)营养状况的影响,证据并不一致。本综述旨在综合有关PSNP对埃塞俄比亚儿童营养状况影响的证据。方法:对谷歌、谷歌Scholar、PubMed等相关知识库进行综合检索,并结合相关关键词进行人工检索(截止到2024年3月15日)。因此,搜索是根据“生产安全网”、“埃塞俄比亚”、“营养状况”和“营养不良”进行的。采用不含meta分析指南的最新系统综述选择相关文献。数据由两位审稿人用MS Excel格式提取并交叉核对。将提取的数据分组,并在适用的情况下以叙述性摘要、描述和定量摘要进行总结。评估偏倚风险,并采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)来评估证据的强度。结果:本综述共纳入9项研究(n = 14,114),这些研究以设计前和设计后、调查和队列研究的形式评估了PSNP成员和非PSNP成员的营养不良风险。该计划有可能改善收入、粮食安全、饮食多样性和减少急性营养不良的发生,但对减少发育迟缓的影响有限。此外,粮食援助或现金转移+粮食援助在改善儿童营养方面优于现金转移模式,这可能会受到食品通胀、被调查者对儿童喂养的知识和态度的影响。总的来说,来自报告营养不良相对风险的调查研究的证据可能会限制可能混淆的因果关系的结论性。结论:PSNP可以改善消瘦现象,但关于减少发育迟缓的证据有限,其中的因果路径可能受到现金券购买力、家庭收入支出模式和受试者的知识和态度限制,限制了其影响。精心设计的实施研究可以进一步提供帮助。考虑到最近的证据,一项全面的审查可能会有所帮助。临床试验注册:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cluster-randomized controlled trial of a mobile produce market designed to address diet and food insecurity in underserved communities. Ultra-processed food consumption among university students: application of front-of-package-based nutrient profiling scores and associations with physical activity and body composition. Adherence, safety, bioavailability, and acceptability of amaranth grain flatbread during pregnancy: evidence from a cluster randomized trial in Sidama region, Ethiopia. Enhancing health outcomes through genetic-based personalized nutrition: investigating the effects of dietary behavior change. Healthcare provider perceptions of a pediatric fruit and vegetable prescription program: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1