Ethnicity optimized indices enhance the diagnostic efficiency of early Keratoconus: A multicenter validation study.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Contact Lens & Anterior Eye Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.clae.2025.102382
Yan Huo, Ruisi Xie, Jing Li, Jie Hou, Haohan Zou, Yan Wang
{"title":"Ethnicity optimized indices enhance the diagnostic efficiency of early Keratoconus: A multicenter validation study.","authors":"Yan Huo, Ruisi Xie, Jing Li, Jie Hou, Haohan Zou, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an ethnically-optimized corneal tomography and biomechanics index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for diagnosing early ectasia in Chinese populations and determine the diagnostic indices' sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff value for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter case-control retrospective study included 1,012 eyes from three centers in China (Tianjin, Shaanxi, and Shandong). The groups included very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography (VAE-NT, n = 146), contralateral ectasia (VAE-E, n = 127), bilateral keratoconus (KC, n = 247), and normal eyes (NL, n = 492). The diagnostic efficiency of the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), CBI for Chinese populations (cCBI), Tomographic and Biomechanical Index version 1 (TBIv1), TBI version 2 (TBIv2), and TBI for Chinese populations (cTBI) was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The diagnostic efficiency was compared using DeLong's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>cTBI had the highest diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing NL from early ectasia (VAE-NT), with an area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.93 at the cutoff value of 0.41, a sensitivity of 84.39 % and specificity of 92.67 %. cTBI diagnostic efficacy in early ectasia was better than TBIv2, TBIv1, cCBI, and CBI (Delong test, P < 0.01). It also had the best efficacy in distinguishing NL from \"disease\" (VAE-NT + VAE-E + KC), with an AUROC of 0.98 at the cutoff value of 0.66, sensitivity of 91.05 %, and specificity of 99.39 %. cTBI achieved 100 % sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing NL from clinical ectasia (VAE-E + KC) at a cutoff of 0.81.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ethnicity optimized cTBI index had good diagnostic efficiency for early ectasia in the Chinese population, highlighting the benefit of ethnic-specific parameter optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an ethnically-optimized corneal tomography and biomechanics index using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for diagnosing early ectasia in Chinese populations and determine the diagnostic indices' sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff value for clinical practice.

Methods: This multicenter case-control retrospective study included 1,012 eyes from three centers in China (Tianjin, Shaanxi, and Shandong). The groups included very asymmetric ectasia with normal topography (VAE-NT, n = 146), contralateral ectasia (VAE-E, n = 127), bilateral keratoconus (KC, n = 247), and normal eyes (NL, n = 492). The diagnostic efficiency of the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI), CBI for Chinese populations (cCBI), Tomographic and Biomechanical Index version 1 (TBIv1), TBI version 2 (TBIv2), and TBI for Chinese populations (cTBI) was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The diagnostic efficiency was compared using DeLong's test.

Results: cTBI had the highest diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing NL from early ectasia (VAE-NT), with an area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.93 at the cutoff value of 0.41, a sensitivity of 84.39 % and specificity of 92.67 %. cTBI diagnostic efficacy in early ectasia was better than TBIv2, TBIv1, cCBI, and CBI (Delong test, P < 0.01). It also had the best efficacy in distinguishing NL from "disease" (VAE-NT + VAE-E + KC), with an AUROC of 0.98 at the cutoff value of 0.66, sensitivity of 91.05 %, and specificity of 99.39 %. cTBI achieved 100 % sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing NL from clinical ectasia (VAE-E + KC) at a cutoff of 0.81.

Conclusions: The ethnicity optimized cTBI index had good diagnostic efficiency for early ectasia in the Chinese population, highlighting the benefit of ethnic-specific parameter optimization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
期刊最新文献
Rodent models for dry eye syndrome (DES). Ethnicity optimized indices enhance the diagnostic efficiency of early Keratoconus: A multicenter validation study. Evaluation of large language models for providing educational information in orthokeratology care. Assessing scleral toricity induced lens flexure and contact disparity using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Designing a contact lens with atropine base using a microemulsion technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1