Building an effective coverage cascade for antenatal care: linking of household survey and health facility assessment data in eight low- and middle-income countries.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04048
Safia S Jiwani, Saqib Rana, Elizabeth A Hazel, Abdoulaye Maïga, Emily B Wilson, Agbessi Amouzou
{"title":"Building an effective coverage cascade for antenatal care: linking of household survey and health facility assessment data in eight low- and middle-income countries.","authors":"Safia S Jiwani, Saqib Rana, Elizabeth A Hazel, Abdoulaye Maïga, Emily B Wilson, Agbessi Amouzou","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substantial gaps exist between pregnant women's contact with health facilities and the quality of care they receive (effective coverage) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An effective coverage cascade is a useful analytical approach to uncover gaps due to poor facility service readiness and quality of care. We estimated readiness-adjusted antenatal care (ANC) coverage and built an effective coverage cascade in countries with available data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from latest household and health facility surveys in eight countries accounting for 28 925 women and 8621 facilities. Service readiness was assessed based on the availability of core items needed to provide quality ANC. We linked the household surveys with health facility data by subnational region and facility type to estimate readiness-adjusted ANC coverage for at least one, four, and eight or more ANC contacts and ANC content. We built a four-step ANC effective coverage cascade and calculated loss of coverage in terms of ANC readiness coverage gaps and missed opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of women sought ANC services in lower-level facilities, except in Bangladesh, Nepal and Senegal. While at least one antenatal care contact (ANC1+) service coverage was high, ranging from 89.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 87.2-90.9) in Haiti to 98.1% (95% CI = 97.5-98.6) in Malawi, readiness-adjusted ANC1+ coverage was lower, ranging from 64% (95% CI = 62.4-65.5) in Haiti to 76.2% (95% CI = 75.1-77.2) in Nepal. We obtained readiness gaps as high as 33.7 percentage points in Malawi and missed opportunities of 21 percentage points in Tanzania. Poor diagnostic capacity and insufficient trained human resources drove the low ANC facility readiness. We found large inequalities in readiness-adjusted ANC1+ by socioeconomic status favouring wealthier and urban resident women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The effective coverage cascade for ANC services helped uncover large readiness gaps, missed opportunities, and socioeconomic inequalities. Improvements in facilities' diagnostic capacity and availability of trained human resources will enhance their ability to provide high quality health services and ensure health gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04048"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substantial gaps exist between pregnant women's contact with health facilities and the quality of care they receive (effective coverage) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An effective coverage cascade is a useful analytical approach to uncover gaps due to poor facility service readiness and quality of care. We estimated readiness-adjusted antenatal care (ANC) coverage and built an effective coverage cascade in countries with available data.

Methods: We used data from latest household and health facility surveys in eight countries accounting for 28 925 women and 8621 facilities. Service readiness was assessed based on the availability of core items needed to provide quality ANC. We linked the household surveys with health facility data by subnational region and facility type to estimate readiness-adjusted ANC coverage for at least one, four, and eight or more ANC contacts and ANC content. We built a four-step ANC effective coverage cascade and calculated loss of coverage in terms of ANC readiness coverage gaps and missed opportunities.

Results: The majority of women sought ANC services in lower-level facilities, except in Bangladesh, Nepal and Senegal. While at least one antenatal care contact (ANC1+) service coverage was high, ranging from 89.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 87.2-90.9) in Haiti to 98.1% (95% CI = 97.5-98.6) in Malawi, readiness-adjusted ANC1+ coverage was lower, ranging from 64% (95% CI = 62.4-65.5) in Haiti to 76.2% (95% CI = 75.1-77.2) in Nepal. We obtained readiness gaps as high as 33.7 percentage points in Malawi and missed opportunities of 21 percentage points in Tanzania. Poor diagnostic capacity and insufficient trained human resources drove the low ANC facility readiness. We found large inequalities in readiness-adjusted ANC1+ by socioeconomic status favouring wealthier and urban resident women.

Conclusions: The effective coverage cascade for ANC services helped uncover large readiness gaps, missed opportunities, and socioeconomic inequalities. Improvements in facilities' diagnostic capacity and availability of trained human resources will enhance their ability to provide high quality health services and ensure health gains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the global data availability and characteristics of eight risk factors for road traffic injury: an evaluation study across 194 countries/territories, 2000-2019. Building an effective coverage cascade for antenatal care: linking of household survey and health facility assessment data in eight low- and middle-income countries. Building capacity to treat childhood cancer in Papua New Guinea: 'It's a multidisciplinary village'. Building medical oxygen systems in a resource-limited setting: the case of Cameroon. Coal: in a burning world, the dark side of energy still rules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1