Synergising universal health coverage and global health security in the Western Pacific Region.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04037
Yuhua Lai, Di Liang, Albino Bobogare, Buyanjargal Yadamsuren, Esabelle Yam, Siyan Yi, Hugo Bugoro, Jiayan Huang
{"title":"Synergising universal health coverage and global health security in the Western Pacific Region.","authors":"Yuhua Lai, Di Liang, Albino Bobogare, Buyanjargal Yadamsuren, Esabelle Yam, Siyan Yi, Hugo Bugoro, Jiayan Huang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Universal health coverage (UHC) and global health security (GHS) should be pursued synergistically to strengthen health systems. However, existing studies found that the efforts toward the two agendas were divergent worldwide. We reviewed the synergy status between UHC and GHS in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) to provide evidence for decision-makers to promote synergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected the UHC service coverage index (UHC SCI) and the GHS index (GHSI) scores. We created a four-quadrant diagram to discover the gap in UHC and GHS capacities within WPR and divide WPR countries into four groups based on the global mean scores. Further, we adopted global spatial autocorrelation analysis to discover spatial aggregations of high and low scores by calculating Moran's I. In addition, we conducted a correlation analysis to assess the synergy level in WPR and reveal the gap between Pacific Island countries or territories (PICTs) and non-PICTs. We conducted key informant interviews to uncover actual scenarios and address gaps in the quantitative evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the global mean UHC SCI and GHSI scores, nine out of 13 non-PICTs had higher scores, while all 14 of the PICTs had lower scores for both indexes. The Moran's I for WPR countries' UHC SCI and GHSI scores in 2021 were 0.20 and 0.23, respectively (Z-score >2.58; P < 0.01). The correlation coefficients between the two index scores were 0.722 (P < 0.001) at the global level and 0.869 (P < 0.001) at WPR. Within the WPR, the correlation coefficients were 0.859 (P < 0.001) in the non-PICTs and -0.026 (P > 0.05) in the PICTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The synergy level between UHC and GHS was high in the WPR, but this mainly came from the synergy in the non-PICTs. The two agendas have barely synergised the PICTs. To build a safer and healthier WPR, it is important to pay more attention to the countries that have weaker health capacities in the region and narrow the gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04037"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Universal health coverage (UHC) and global health security (GHS) should be pursued synergistically to strengthen health systems. However, existing studies found that the efforts toward the two agendas were divergent worldwide. We reviewed the synergy status between UHC and GHS in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) to provide evidence for decision-makers to promote synergy.

Methods: We collected the UHC service coverage index (UHC SCI) and the GHS index (GHSI) scores. We created a four-quadrant diagram to discover the gap in UHC and GHS capacities within WPR and divide WPR countries into four groups based on the global mean scores. Further, we adopted global spatial autocorrelation analysis to discover spatial aggregations of high and low scores by calculating Moran's I. In addition, we conducted a correlation analysis to assess the synergy level in WPR and reveal the gap between Pacific Island countries or territories (PICTs) and non-PICTs. We conducted key informant interviews to uncover actual scenarios and address gaps in the quantitative evidence.

Results: Compared to the global mean UHC SCI and GHSI scores, nine out of 13 non-PICTs had higher scores, while all 14 of the PICTs had lower scores for both indexes. The Moran's I for WPR countries' UHC SCI and GHSI scores in 2021 were 0.20 and 0.23, respectively (Z-score >2.58; P < 0.01). The correlation coefficients between the two index scores were 0.722 (P < 0.001) at the global level and 0.869 (P < 0.001) at WPR. Within the WPR, the correlation coefficients were 0.859 (P < 0.001) in the non-PICTs and -0.026 (P > 0.05) in the PICTs.

Conclusions: The synergy level between UHC and GHS was high in the WPR, but this mainly came from the synergy in the non-PICTs. The two agendas have barely synergised the PICTs. To build a safer and healthier WPR, it is important to pay more attention to the countries that have weaker health capacities in the region and narrow the gap.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在西太平洋区域协调全民健康覆盖和全球卫生安全。
背景:全民健康覆盖(UHC)和全球卫生安全(GHS)应协同推进,以加强卫生系统。然而,现有的研究发现,世界范围内对这两个议程的努力是不同的。我们回顾了西太平洋地区全民健康覆盖与全球健康保障之间的协同作用状况,为决策者促进协同作用提供证据。方法:收集全民健康覆盖指数(UHC SCI)和GHS指数(GHSI)评分。我们创建了一个四象限图,以发现全民健康覆盖和全球卫生系统在《世界卫生行动计划》内的能力差距,并根据全球平均得分将《世界卫生行动计划》国家分为四组。此外,我们采用全球空间自相关分析,通过计算Moran’si来发现高、低分的空间聚集。此外,我们通过相关分析来评估太平洋岛国或地区(PICTs)与非PICTs的协同水平,揭示太平洋岛国或地区(PICTs)与非PICTs之间的差距。我们进行了关键线人访谈,以揭示实际情况并解决定量证据中的差距。结果:与全球UHC SCI和GHSI平均得分相比,13名非pict中有9名得分较高,而所有14名pict的两项指数得分均较低。WPR国家在2021年的UHC SCI和GHSI得分的Moran's I分别为0.20和0.23 (Z-score bb0 2.58;p0.05)。结论:在WPR中,全民健康覆盖与GHS的协同作用水平较高,但这主要来自于非picts的协同作用。这两个议程几乎没有协同PICTs。要建立一个更安全、更健康的世界卫生报告,重要的是要更多地关注本区域卫生能力较弱的国家,缩小差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Smoking and risk of restless leg syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and Mendelian randomisation. Weight change across adulthood in relation to ultrasound-defined metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a population-based study. Quality of medical services provided to mothers, newborns and children at the hospital level in the Kyrgyz Republic. An updated framework for task shifting and sharing: refining the SHIFT-SHARE based on stakeholder feedback from India. Antenatal magnesium sulphate for preterm foetal neuroprotection in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of research studies and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1