Integrating postnatal care into the redesign of group care beyond birth.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01508-4
Ashley Gresh, Astrid Van Damme, Deborah L Billings, Sharon Schindler Rising, Shaimaa Ibrahim, Abiola Ajibola, Ellen Chirwa, Jennyfer Don-Aki, Nastassia Donoho, Manodj Hindori, Nafisa Jiddawi, Emeka Kanebi, Esnath Kapito, Catherine Kay, Tara Kinra, Vlorian Molliqaj, Bolanle Oyeledun, Marlies E B Rijnders, Octavia Wiseman, Ghutai Sadeq Yaqubi, Crystal L Patil
{"title":"Integrating postnatal care into the redesign of group care beyond birth.","authors":"Ashley Gresh, Astrid Van Damme, Deborah L Billings, Sharon Schindler Rising, Shaimaa Ibrahim, Abiola Ajibola, Ellen Chirwa, Jennyfer Don-Aki, Nastassia Donoho, Manodj Hindori, Nafisa Jiddawi, Emeka Kanebi, Esnath Kapito, Catherine Kay, Tara Kinra, Vlorian Molliqaj, Bolanle Oyeledun, Marlies E B Rijnders, Octavia Wiseman, Ghutai Sadeq Yaqubi, Crystal L Patil","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01508-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, alarmingly high rates of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity persist. A constellation of health system and social factors contribute to this, including poor quality and barriers to accessing health care, including preventive services. As such, there have been calls for a redesign of maternal and child health (MCH) services. Although group care has primarily been tested in antenatal settings, it offers a promising redesign that optimizes maternal and child health care, survival, and well-being. The purpose of this study was to produce a blueprint of an adapted group care model that integrates postnatal maternal care, well-child care, and family engagement to be adapted to realities of different settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a human-centered design approach and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), we employed qualitative methods to adapt CenteringParenting<sup>®</sup> (retaining its three core pillars of health assessment, interactive learning, and community building), and co-create the blueprint for group care beyond birth that can be used across settings. We initiated the process through face-to-face workshops during a global meeting on group care, followed by six online incubator sessions with key stakeholders from 13 countries during which we used qualitative methods of free listing, pile sorting, and ranking. We conducted a rapid qualitative analysis to produce a blueprint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants collaboratively modified the content, format, and evaluation of CenteringParenting<sup>®</sup> with the goal of creating a blueprint that integrates postnatal and pediatric care into group care that can be further adapted and implemented across diverse settings and contexts. The blueprint consists of suggested timing of visits over two years after birth, suggested visit content, and evaluation metrics for research and practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The resulting group care beyond birth blueprint offers a strategy to redesign maternal and infant/child health services that can positively transform postnatal care and provide essential services to postpartum people. Adaptation of the blueprint to local realities is expected. Future research is recommended to test the model's acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness across settings. Using this blueprint, we can build the evidence base to support this model aiming to improve maternal and infant/child health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11823241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01508-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, alarmingly high rates of maternal and infant mortality and morbidity persist. A constellation of health system and social factors contribute to this, including poor quality and barriers to accessing health care, including preventive services. As such, there have been calls for a redesign of maternal and child health (MCH) services. Although group care has primarily been tested in antenatal settings, it offers a promising redesign that optimizes maternal and child health care, survival, and well-being. The purpose of this study was to produce a blueprint of an adapted group care model that integrates postnatal maternal care, well-child care, and family engagement to be adapted to realities of different settings.

Methods: Using a human-centered design approach and the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based interventions (FRAME), we employed qualitative methods to adapt CenteringParenting® (retaining its three core pillars of health assessment, interactive learning, and community building), and co-create the blueprint for group care beyond birth that can be used across settings. We initiated the process through face-to-face workshops during a global meeting on group care, followed by six online incubator sessions with key stakeholders from 13 countries during which we used qualitative methods of free listing, pile sorting, and ranking. We conducted a rapid qualitative analysis to produce a blueprint.

Results: Participants collaboratively modified the content, format, and evaluation of CenteringParenting® with the goal of creating a blueprint that integrates postnatal and pediatric care into group care that can be further adapted and implemented across diverse settings and contexts. The blueprint consists of suggested timing of visits over two years after birth, suggested visit content, and evaluation metrics for research and practice.

Conclusions: The resulting group care beyond birth blueprint offers a strategy to redesign maternal and infant/child health services that can positively transform postnatal care and provide essential services to postpartum people. Adaptation of the blueprint to local realities is expected. Future research is recommended to test the model's acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness across settings. Using this blueprint, we can build the evidence base to support this model aiming to improve maternal and infant/child health outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将产后护理纳入分娩后群体护理的重新设计。
背景:在全球范围内,高得惊人的孕产妇和婴儿死亡率和发病率持续存在。一系列卫生系统和社会因素造成了这种情况,包括质量差和获得卫生保健(包括预防服务)的障碍。因此,有人呼吁重新设计妇幼保健服务。虽然小组护理主要在产前环境中进行了测试,但它提供了一种有希望的重新设计,可以优化孕产妇和儿童的保健、生存和福祉。本研究的目的是制定一个适应群体护理模式的蓝图,该模式整合了产后产妇护理、幼儿护理和家庭参与,以适应不同环境的现实。方法:采用以人为中心的设计方法和基于证据的干预措施适应和修改报告框架(FRAME),我们采用定性方法调整CenteringParenting®(保留其健康评估、互动学习和社区建设的三个核心支柱),并共同创建可在各种情况下使用的出生后群体护理蓝图。我们在一次关于集体护理的全球会议期间通过面对面的研讨会启动了这一进程,随后与来自13个国家的主要利益相关者举行了6次在线孵化器会议,在此期间我们使用了免费清单、堆分类和排名的定性方法。我们进行了快速的定性分析,以制定蓝图。结果:参与者协作修改了CenteringParenting®的内容、格式和评估,目标是创建一个蓝图,将产后和儿科护理整合到群体护理中,可以在不同的环境和背景下进一步调整和实施。该蓝图包括出生后两年内建议的就诊时间、建议的就诊内容以及用于研究和实践的评估指标。结论:由此产生的超越分娩的群体护理蓝图为重新设计孕产妇和婴幼儿保健服务提供了一种策略,可以积极改变产后护理,为产后人群提供基本服务。预计该蓝图将根据当地实际情况进行调整。建议未来的研究来测试模型的可接受性、可行性和跨设置的有效性。利用这一蓝图,我们可以建立证据基础,以支持旨在改善孕产妇和婴幼儿健康结果的这一模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Willingness to pay for injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among male and female sex workers in Uganda. Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cervico-vaginal high-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in India prior to nationwide human papillomavirus vaccination. Methodological heterogeneity and equity challenges of distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare: a systematic review from 2017 to 2025. Reasons for HIV testing in women diagnosed with HIV (2000-2023): insights from a 24-year retrospective cohort study in Barcelona, Spain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1