Barbara Kiesel, Martin Borkovec, Julia Furtner, Thomas Roetzer-Pejrimovsky, Karl-Heinz Nenning, Lisa Greutter, Yelyzaveta Miller-Michlits, Georg Widhalm, Adelheid Woehrer
{"title":"Sex-specific differences in DNA methylation defining prognostically relevant subgroups in glioblastoma.","authors":"Barbara Kiesel, Martin Borkovec, Julia Furtner, Thomas Roetzer-Pejrimovsky, Karl-Heinz Nenning, Lisa Greutter, Yelyzaveta Miller-Michlits, Georg Widhalm, Adelheid Woehrer","doi":"10.3171/2024.9.JNS24665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor that is more common and has a worse outcome in males. Recently, the observed sex differences have been linked to tumor biology, prominently highlighting fundamental differences in gene expression programs. Here, the authors advance this concept to epigenome-based DNA methylation patterns across primary and recurring glioblastoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors leveraged their 614 publicly available DNA methylation datasets comprising 252 female and 362 male patients with glioblastoma. They applied a joint and individual variation explained analysis to explore clusters among tumors in males and females in an unsupervised way. Their prognostic association was explored using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. Their findings were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clustering of the individual, sex-specific components yielded two distinct clusters in males and females, which were predictive of overall survival in males (p = 0.0098). Among differentially regulated genes in males, the 20 most consistently altered genes resulted in a targeted panel, which predicted overall survival in males and females at the first surgery (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.013) but not at recurrence (p = 0.3 and p = 0.85, respectively). These findings were validated in TCGA dataset. The authors translated the observed differences in survival to networked pathways prominently highlighting protein metabolism in males and oxidative phosphorylation in females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, the authors report sex-specific differences in DNA methylation patterns among male and female cases of glioblastoma that converge on a set of 20 genes that have a prognostic impact in both sexes at the first surgery. Sex-specific networks of pathways suggest prominent roles for protein processing and antigen presentation in males and metabolism in females. The study findings provide new insights in sex-specific tumor biology to further improve individual gender-based patient management and estimation of disease prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.9.JNS24665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor that is more common and has a worse outcome in males. Recently, the observed sex differences have been linked to tumor biology, prominently highlighting fundamental differences in gene expression programs. Here, the authors advance this concept to epigenome-based DNA methylation patterns across primary and recurring glioblastoma.
Methods: The authors leveraged their 614 publicly available DNA methylation datasets comprising 252 female and 362 male patients with glioblastoma. They applied a joint and individual variation explained analysis to explore clusters among tumors in males and females in an unsupervised way. Their prognostic association was explored using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model. Their findings were validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset.
Results: Clustering of the individual, sex-specific components yielded two distinct clusters in males and females, which were predictive of overall survival in males (p = 0.0098). Among differentially regulated genes in males, the 20 most consistently altered genes resulted in a targeted panel, which predicted overall survival in males and females at the first surgery (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.013) but not at recurrence (p = 0.3 and p = 0.85, respectively). These findings were validated in TCGA dataset. The authors translated the observed differences in survival to networked pathways prominently highlighting protein metabolism in males and oxidative phosphorylation in females.
Conclusions: In summary, the authors report sex-specific differences in DNA methylation patterns among male and female cases of glioblastoma that converge on a set of 20 genes that have a prognostic impact in both sexes at the first surgery. Sex-specific networks of pathways suggest prominent roles for protein processing and antigen presentation in males and metabolism in females. The study findings provide new insights in sex-specific tumor biology to further improve individual gender-based patient management and estimation of disease prognosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.