The impact of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the National Trauma Registry.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-02-14 Print Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.10.JNS24502
Anton Peled, Gil Kimchi, Adi Givon, Raquel C Gardner, Nachshon Knoller, Eldad Katorza, Irit Cohen-Manheim
{"title":"The impact of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the National Trauma Registry.","authors":"Anton Peled, Gil Kimchi, Adi Givon, Raquel C Gardner, Nachshon Knoller, Eldad Katorza, Irit Cohen-Manheim","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS24502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is a cornerstone procedure in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, its implementation is low and the impact on outcomes debated. The authors' objective was to determine the association between ICPM and 1-year mortality in severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR) of severe TBI patients admitted to level I trauma centers from 2015 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of 1-year mortality, adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, other severe injuries (nonhead Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 4), hypotension, and surgical decompression. The main outcome was 1-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2202 patients, 36.8% underwent insertion of ICPM. ICPM patients had a lower 1-year mortality rate (28.12% vs 33.60%, p = 0.015). Compared with ICPM, the adjusted odds of 1-year mortality of no ICPM were increased 1.2-fold (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.54). The effect size was greater among patients with head AIS score 5-6 and age 18-64 years (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.20) and age ≥ 65 years (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.55); the effect size of no ICPM in those with head AIS score 3-4 was decreased (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant association between ICPM and lower 1-year mortality in the most severe TBI patients (head AIS score 5-6) who were ≥ 18 years of age was observed. The authors' study supports the use of ICPM in severe TBI. The authors recommend more detailed reporting to best inform quality improvement programs on a national scale. This research contributes to the academic dialogue on TBI and the considerations for enhancing patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1625-1634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS24502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is a cornerstone procedure in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, its implementation is low and the impact on outcomes debated. The authors' objective was to determine the association between ICPM and 1-year mortality in severe TBI.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR) of severe TBI patients admitted to level I trauma centers from 2015 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of 1-year mortality, adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, other severe injuries (nonhead Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 4), hypotension, and surgical decompression. The main outcome was 1-year mortality.

Results: Of 2202 patients, 36.8% underwent insertion of ICPM. ICPM patients had a lower 1-year mortality rate (28.12% vs 33.60%, p = 0.015). Compared with ICPM, the adjusted odds of 1-year mortality of no ICPM were increased 1.2-fold (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.54). The effect size was greater among patients with head AIS score 5-6 and age 18-64 years (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.20) and age ≥ 65 years (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.55); the effect size of no ICPM in those with head AIS score 3-4 was decreased (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93).

Conclusions: A significant association between ICPM and lower 1-year mortality in the most severe TBI patients (head AIS score 5-6) who were ≥ 18 years of age was observed. The authors' study supports the use of ICPM in severe TBI. The authors recommend more detailed reporting to best inform quality improvement programs on a national scale. This research contributes to the academic dialogue on TBI and the considerations for enhancing patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内压监测对严重创伤性脑损伤的影响:来自国家创伤登记处的结果。
目的:颅内压监测(ICPM)是治疗重型颅脑损伤(TBI)的重要手段。然而,它的实施程度很低,对结果的影响也存在争议。作者的目的是确定ICPM与严重TBI患者1年死亡率之间的关系。方法:作者利用以色列国家创伤登记处(INTR) 2015年至2021年在一级创伤中心住院的严重TBI患者的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。采用多变量logistic回归计算1年死亡率的比值比(OR),校正年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、其他严重损伤(非头部简易损伤量表[AIS]评分≥4)、低血压和手术减压。主要结局为1年死亡率。结果:2202例患者中,36.8%的患者接受了ICPM的插入。ICPM患者的1年死亡率较低(28.12% vs 33.60%, p = 0.015)。与ICPM相比,未ICPM组1年死亡率的调整后几率增加1.2倍(OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.54)。头部AIS评分5-6、年龄18-64岁(OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.20)和年龄≥65岁(OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.55)的患者的效应量更大;头部AIS评分为3-4分的患者无ICPM的效应量降低(OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93)。结论:观察到年龄≥18岁的最严重TBI患者(头部AIS评分5-6)的ICPM与较低的1年死亡率之间存在显著关联。作者的研究支持在严重TBI中使用ICPM。作者建议更详细的报告,以最好地告知全国范围内的质量改进计划。这项研究有助于TBI的学术对话和加强患者护理的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fund patients, not systems. Hemodynamic parameters as biomarkers for predicting microvascular decompression efficacy in classic trigeminal neuralgia. Letter to the Editor. Surgical laterality and neurocognitive outcomes in adult moyamoya. Predicting tremor control and side effects during focused ultrasound thalamotomy using MR temperature imaging. Surgical neuromodulation: prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus, decolonization, and rates of infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1