Anton Peled, Gil Kimchi, Adi Givon, Raquel C Gardner, Nachshon Knoller, Eldad Katorza, Irit Cohen-Manheim
{"title":"The impact of intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the National Trauma Registry.","authors":"Anton Peled, Gil Kimchi, Adi Givon, Raquel C Gardner, Nachshon Knoller, Eldad Katorza, Irit Cohen-Manheim","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS24502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is a cornerstone procedure in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, its implementation is low and the impact on outcomes debated. The authors' objective was to determine the association between ICPM and 1-year mortality in severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR) of severe TBI patients admitted to level I trauma centers from 2015 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of 1-year mortality, adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, other severe injuries (nonhead Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 4), hypotension, and surgical decompression. The main outcome was 1-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2202 patients, 36.8% underwent insertion of ICPM. ICPM patients had a lower 1-year mortality rate (28.12% vs 33.60%, p = 0.015). Compared with ICPM, the adjusted odds of 1-year mortality of no ICPM were increased 1.2-fold (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.54). The effect size was greater among patients with head AIS score 5-6 and age 18-64 years (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.20) and age ≥ 65 years (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.55); the effect size of no ICPM in those with head AIS score 3-4 was decreased (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant association between ICPM and lower 1-year mortality in the most severe TBI patients (head AIS score 5-6) who were ≥ 18 years of age was observed. The authors' study supports the use of ICPM in severe TBI. The authors recommend more detailed reporting to best inform quality improvement programs on a national scale. This research contributes to the academic dialogue on TBI and the considerations for enhancing patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1625-1634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS24502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is a cornerstone procedure in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, its implementation is low and the impact on outcomes debated. The authors' objective was to determine the association between ICPM and 1-year mortality in severe TBI.
Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Israel National Trauma Registry (INTR) of severe TBI patients admitted to level I trauma centers from 2015 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) of 1-year mortality, adjusted for age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, other severe injuries (nonhead Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score ≥ 4), hypotension, and surgical decompression. The main outcome was 1-year mortality.
Results: Of 2202 patients, 36.8% underwent insertion of ICPM. ICPM patients had a lower 1-year mortality rate (28.12% vs 33.60%, p = 0.015). Compared with ICPM, the adjusted odds of 1-year mortality of no ICPM were increased 1.2-fold (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.54). The effect size was greater among patients with head AIS score 5-6 and age 18-64 years (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.20) and age ≥ 65 years (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.55); the effect size of no ICPM in those with head AIS score 3-4 was decreased (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93).
Conclusions: A significant association between ICPM and lower 1-year mortality in the most severe TBI patients (head AIS score 5-6) who were ≥ 18 years of age was observed. The authors' study supports the use of ICPM in severe TBI. The authors recommend more detailed reporting to best inform quality improvement programs on a national scale. This research contributes to the academic dialogue on TBI and the considerations for enhancing patient care.
目的:颅内压监测(ICPM)是治疗重型颅脑损伤(TBI)的重要手段。然而,它的实施程度很低,对结果的影响也存在争议。作者的目的是确定ICPM与严重TBI患者1年死亡率之间的关系。方法:作者利用以色列国家创伤登记处(INTR) 2015年至2021年在一级创伤中心住院的严重TBI患者的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。采用多变量logistic回归计算1年死亡率的比值比(OR),校正年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、其他严重损伤(非头部简易损伤量表[AIS]评分≥4)、低血压和手术减压。主要结局为1年死亡率。结果:2202例患者中,36.8%的患者接受了ICPM的插入。ICPM患者的1年死亡率较低(28.12% vs 33.60%, p = 0.015)。与ICPM相比,未ICPM组1年死亡率的调整后几率增加1.2倍(OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.96-1.54)。头部AIS评分5-6、年龄18-64岁(OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.13-2.20)和年龄≥65岁(OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.55)的患者的效应量更大;头部AIS评分为3-4分的患者无ICPM的效应量降低(OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.93)。结论:观察到年龄≥18岁的最严重TBI患者(头部AIS评分5-6)的ICPM与较低的1年死亡率之间存在显著关联。作者的研究支持在严重TBI中使用ICPM。作者建议更详细的报告,以最好地告知全国范围内的质量改进计划。这项研究有助于TBI的学术对话和加强患者护理的考虑。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.