Evaluating sample normalization methods for MS-based multi-omics and the application to a neurodegenerative mouse model

IF 3.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analyst Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1039/d4an01573h
Gwang Bin Lee, Cha Yang, Fenghua Hu, Ling Hao
{"title":"Evaluating sample normalization methods for MS-based multi-omics and the application to a neurodegenerative mouse model","authors":"Gwang Bin Lee, Cha Yang, Fenghua Hu, Ling Hao","doi":"10.1039/d4an01573h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mass spectrometry (MS)-based omics methods have transformed biomedical research with accurate and high-throughput analysis of diverse molecules in biological systems. Recent technological advances also enabled multi-omics to be achieved from the same sample or on a single analytical platform. Sample normalization is a critical step in MS-omics studies but is usually conducted independently for each omics experiment. To bridge this technical gap, we evaluated different sample normalization methods suitable for analyzing proteins, lipids, and metabolites from the same sample for multi-omics analysis. We found that normalizing samples based on tissue weight or protein concentration before or after extraction generated distinct quantitative results. Normalizing samples first by tissue weight before extraction and then by protein concentration after extraction resulted in the lowest sample variation to reveal true biological differences. We then applied this two-step normalization method to investigate multi-omics profiles of mouse brains lacking the GRN gene. Loss-of-function mutations in the GRN gene lead to the deficiency of the progranulin protein and eventually cause neurodegeneration. Comparing the proteomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics profiles of GRN KO and WT mouse brains revealed molecular changes and pathways related to lysosomal dysfunction and neuroinflammation. In summary, we demonstrated the importance of selecting an appropriate normalization method during multi-omics sample preparation. Our normalization method is applicable to all tissue-based multi-omics studies, ensuring reliable and accurate biomolecule quantification for biological comparisons.","PeriodicalId":63,"journal":{"name":"Analyst","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyst","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4an01573h","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass spectrometry (MS)-based omics methods have transformed biomedical research with accurate and high-throughput analysis of diverse molecules in biological systems. Recent technological advances also enabled multi-omics to be achieved from the same sample or on a single analytical platform. Sample normalization is a critical step in MS-omics studies but is usually conducted independently for each omics experiment. To bridge this technical gap, we evaluated different sample normalization methods suitable for analyzing proteins, lipids, and metabolites from the same sample for multi-omics analysis. We found that normalizing samples based on tissue weight or protein concentration before or after extraction generated distinct quantitative results. Normalizing samples first by tissue weight before extraction and then by protein concentration after extraction resulted in the lowest sample variation to reveal true biological differences. We then applied this two-step normalization method to investigate multi-omics profiles of mouse brains lacking the GRN gene. Loss-of-function mutations in the GRN gene lead to the deficiency of the progranulin protein and eventually cause neurodegeneration. Comparing the proteomics, lipidomics, and metabolomics profiles of GRN KO and WT mouse brains revealed molecular changes and pathways related to lysosomal dysfunction and neuroinflammation. In summary, we demonstrated the importance of selecting an appropriate normalization method during multi-omics sample preparation. Our normalization method is applicable to all tissue-based multi-omics studies, ensuring reliable and accurate biomolecule quantification for biological comparisons.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以质谱(MS)为基础的组学方法通过对生物系统中的各种分子进行精确的高通量分析,改变了生物医学研究。最近的技术进步也使得从同一样品或在单一分析平台上实现多组学成为可能。样品归一化是 MS-omics 研究的关键步骤,但通常每个 omics 实验都要独立进行。为了弥补这一技术差距,我们评估了不同的样品归一化方法,这些方法适用于从同一样品中分析蛋白质、脂类和代谢物,以进行多组学分析。我们发现,在提取前或提取后根据组织重量或蛋白质浓度对样本进行归一化处理会产生不同的定量结果。首先根据提取前的组织重量对样本进行归一化,然后根据提取后的蛋白质浓度进行归一化,这样能使样本的差异最小,从而揭示真正的生物差异。然后,我们将这种两步归一化方法用于研究缺乏 GRN 基因的小鼠大脑的多组学特征。GRN 基因的功能缺失突变会导致原花青素蛋白的缺乏,并最终引起神经退行性变。比较 GRN KO 和 WT 小鼠大脑的蛋白质组学、脂质组学和代谢组学图谱,发现了与溶酶体功能障碍和神经炎症有关的分子变化和通路。总之,我们证明了在多组学样本制备过程中选择适当归一化方法的重要性。我们的归一化方法适用于所有基于组织的多组学研究,可确保生物比较中生物大分子量化的可靠性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analyst
Analyst 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
636
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: "Analyst" journal is the home of premier fundamental discoveries, inventions and applications in the analytical and bioanalytical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Recent advances in the metallic and metal oxide nanoparticle-assisted molecular methods for the detection of Escherichia coli Oxygen Vacancy-Enriched NiO Nanozymes Achieved by Facile Annealing in Argon for Detection of L-Cys An amplification-free digital droplet assay for influenza A viral RNA based on CRISPR/Cas13a. Evaluating sample normalization methods for MS-based multi-omics and the application to a neurodegenerative mouse model Correction: Infrared spectromicroscopy of biochemistry in functional single cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1