The effects of recreational activities on wild mammals

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Global Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03485
F. Sganzerla , L. Scillitani , F. Brivio , S. Grignolio
{"title":"The effects of recreational activities on wild mammals","authors":"F. Sganzerla ,&nbsp;L. Scillitani ,&nbsp;F. Brivio ,&nbsp;S. Grignolio","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An increasing number of people practise nature-based recreational activities, generating great economic resources, which can become a threat to wildlife species, because wild animals may perceive human presence as a predation risk. Many studies have investigated the effects induced in wild mammals by nature-based recreation. Despite that, a thorough overview of the literature focused on this topic is lacking. We conducted a broad bibliographic search, reviewed 209 articles, and identified 672 case studies about the effect of recreational activities on terrestrial mammals. We hypothesised behavioural metrics, disturbance sources and protocols of data collection affect the probability of detecting the effect of recreational activities. We highlighted this research topic is affected by huge bias both on a taxonomical and geographical level. Studies were mostly carried out in North America or Europe and almost 90 % of them focused on Cetartiodactyla, Carnivora, and Rodentia. Nevertheless, trends in publication rates suggest that these biases are declining. Using multiple regression, we examined the study designs to understand which features were linked with a higher probability of detecting a disturbance. Although studies measuring physiological responses are scarce in the literature, these seem to be more likely to detect disturbances than behavioural ones. Studies implemented on individually recognisable animals are associated with a higher likelihood of detecting the effects of the disturbance.</div><div>Harnessing this knowledge, future studies could generate a better understanding of the effects of recreational activities. Adopting suitable study protocols is essential for efficiently managing economic resources in scientific research and can help define better conservation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increasing number of people practise nature-based recreational activities, generating great economic resources, which can become a threat to wildlife species, because wild animals may perceive human presence as a predation risk. Many studies have investigated the effects induced in wild mammals by nature-based recreation. Despite that, a thorough overview of the literature focused on this topic is lacking. We conducted a broad bibliographic search, reviewed 209 articles, and identified 672 case studies about the effect of recreational activities on terrestrial mammals. We hypothesised behavioural metrics, disturbance sources and protocols of data collection affect the probability of detecting the effect of recreational activities. We highlighted this research topic is affected by huge bias both on a taxonomical and geographical level. Studies were mostly carried out in North America or Europe and almost 90 % of them focused on Cetartiodactyla, Carnivora, and Rodentia. Nevertheless, trends in publication rates suggest that these biases are declining. Using multiple regression, we examined the study designs to understand which features were linked with a higher probability of detecting a disturbance. Although studies measuring physiological responses are scarce in the literature, these seem to be more likely to detect disturbances than behavioural ones. Studies implemented on individually recognisable animals are associated with a higher likelihood of detecting the effects of the disturbance.
Harnessing this knowledge, future studies could generate a better understanding of the effects of recreational activities. Adopting suitable study protocols is essential for efficiently managing economic resources in scientific research and can help define better conservation strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
期刊最新文献
Indigenous Lands inhibit mining-induced deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Calcium carbonate content for two morphotypes of an indicator charophyte species across a depth and light gradient in a mesotrophic lake Mapping suitable habitat and Anthropocene refugia for Ethiopian Guerezas: Insights for their conservation Landscape features outside the airport exerted direct and indirect impact on bird community characteristics inside the airport Three decades of the practice of decentralised forest management in Africa: A systematic review of current knowledge and prospects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1