F. Sganzerla , L. Scillitani , F. Brivio , S. Grignolio
{"title":"The effects of recreational activities on wild mammals","authors":"F. Sganzerla , L. Scillitani , F. Brivio , S. Grignolio","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An increasing number of people practise nature-based recreational activities, generating great economic resources, which can become a threat to wildlife species, because wild animals may perceive human presence as a predation risk. Many studies have investigated the effects induced in wild mammals by nature-based recreation. Despite that, a thorough overview of the literature focused on this topic is lacking. We conducted a broad bibliographic search, reviewed 209 articles, and identified 672 case studies about the effect of recreational activities on terrestrial mammals. We hypothesised behavioural metrics, disturbance sources and protocols of data collection affect the probability of detecting the effect of recreational activities. We highlighted this research topic is affected by huge bias both on a taxonomical and geographical level. Studies were mostly carried out in North America or Europe and almost 90 % of them focused on Cetartiodactyla, Carnivora, and Rodentia. Nevertheless, trends in publication rates suggest that these biases are declining. Using multiple regression, we examined the study designs to understand which features were linked with a higher probability of detecting a disturbance. Although studies measuring physiological responses are scarce in the literature, these seem to be more likely to detect disturbances than behavioural ones. Studies implemented on individually recognisable animals are associated with a higher likelihood of detecting the effects of the disturbance.</div><div>Harnessing this knowledge, future studies could generate a better understanding of the effects of recreational activities. Adopting suitable study protocols is essential for efficiently managing economic resources in scientific research and can help define better conservation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article e03485"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425000861","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An increasing number of people practise nature-based recreational activities, generating great economic resources, which can become a threat to wildlife species, because wild animals may perceive human presence as a predation risk. Many studies have investigated the effects induced in wild mammals by nature-based recreation. Despite that, a thorough overview of the literature focused on this topic is lacking. We conducted a broad bibliographic search, reviewed 209 articles, and identified 672 case studies about the effect of recreational activities on terrestrial mammals. We hypothesised behavioural metrics, disturbance sources and protocols of data collection affect the probability of detecting the effect of recreational activities. We highlighted this research topic is affected by huge bias both on a taxonomical and geographical level. Studies were mostly carried out in North America or Europe and almost 90 % of them focused on Cetartiodactyla, Carnivora, and Rodentia. Nevertheless, trends in publication rates suggest that these biases are declining. Using multiple regression, we examined the study designs to understand which features were linked with a higher probability of detecting a disturbance. Although studies measuring physiological responses are scarce in the literature, these seem to be more likely to detect disturbances than behavioural ones. Studies implemented on individually recognisable animals are associated with a higher likelihood of detecting the effects of the disturbance.
Harnessing this knowledge, future studies could generate a better understanding of the effects of recreational activities. Adopting suitable study protocols is essential for efficiently managing economic resources in scientific research and can help define better conservation strategies.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.