Threatened fauna that use blue carbon ecosystems: A review from Australia

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Biological Conservation Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111030
Kristian Bell , Siegmund Nuyts , Christopher Bie , Valerie Hagger , Peter Macreadie , Melissa Wartman
{"title":"Threatened fauna that use blue carbon ecosystems: A review from Australia","authors":"Kristian Bell ,&nbsp;Siegmund Nuyts ,&nbsp;Christopher Bie ,&nbsp;Valerie Hagger ,&nbsp;Peter Macreadie ,&nbsp;Melissa Wartman","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid global biodiversity and climate crises, restoring blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs) like mangroves, tidal marshes, and seagrass may offer multiple biodiversity and climate benefits. However, species-specific information on BCE use remains unconsolidated and often inaccessible to land managers. Here we compile a database and examine broad ecological patterns in the use of BCEs by threatened Australian fauna, including amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, mammals and reptiles. The database is presented within an open-access web tool to assist with restoration decisions and monitoring actions. We identified 30 threatened species that depend on BCEs (‘obligates’), and a further 160 threatened species that benefit from the resources BCEs provide (‘facultatives’). Obligate species included the Critically Endangered Orange-bellied parrot (<em>Neophema chrysogaster</em>), and the Endangered Green turtle (<em>Chelonia mydas</em>), Australian sea lion (<em>Neophoca cinerea</em>) and Mangrove ant-blue butterfly (<em>Acrodipsas illidgei</em>). Obligate species displayed many characteristics often associated with higher extinction risk, including smaller home range sizes, diurnal activity and carnivorous diets. Habitat loss and degradation combined threaten 91.7 % of obligate species, with most species (90.9 %) facing these threats within Australia. Significant disparities exist in available information for obligate species, particularly invertebrates, resulting in greater uncertainty around species ranges and level of reliance on BCEs. With habitat loss and degradation driving declines in threatened species, the conservation importance and potential benefit of future blue carbon protection and restoration projects is pronounced. Our findings and web tool aid project planning by facilitating rapid identification of target species, along with species-specific survey methods, population trajectories, and key threats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 111030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725000679","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amid global biodiversity and climate crises, restoring blue carbon ecosystems (BCEs) like mangroves, tidal marshes, and seagrass may offer multiple biodiversity and climate benefits. However, species-specific information on BCE use remains unconsolidated and often inaccessible to land managers. Here we compile a database and examine broad ecological patterns in the use of BCEs by threatened Australian fauna, including amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, mammals and reptiles. The database is presented within an open-access web tool to assist with restoration decisions and monitoring actions. We identified 30 threatened species that depend on BCEs (‘obligates’), and a further 160 threatened species that benefit from the resources BCEs provide (‘facultatives’). Obligate species included the Critically Endangered Orange-bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster), and the Endangered Green turtle (Chelonia mydas), Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) and Mangrove ant-blue butterfly (Acrodipsas illidgei). Obligate species displayed many characteristics often associated with higher extinction risk, including smaller home range sizes, diurnal activity and carnivorous diets. Habitat loss and degradation combined threaten 91.7 % of obligate species, with most species (90.9 %) facing these threats within Australia. Significant disparities exist in available information for obligate species, particularly invertebrates, resulting in greater uncertainty around species ranges and level of reliance on BCEs. With habitat loss and degradation driving declines in threatened species, the conservation importance and potential benefit of future blue carbon protection and restoration projects is pronounced. Our findings and web tool aid project planning by facilitating rapid identification of target species, along with species-specific survey methods, population trajectories, and key threats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用蓝碳生态系统的濒危动物:来自澳大利亚的综述
在全球生物多样性和气候危机中,恢复红树林、潮汐沼泽和海草等蓝碳生态系统(bce)可能会带来多种生物多样性和气候效益。但是,关于生物多样性利用的特定物种信息仍然不完整,土地管理人员往往无法获得。在这里,我们编制了一个数据库,并研究了受威胁的澳大利亚动物使用bce的广泛生态模式,包括两栖动物、鸟类、鱼类、无脊椎动物、哺乳动物和爬行动物。数据库在一个开放访问的网络工具中呈现,以协助恢复决策和监测行动。我们确定了30种依赖于bce的濒危物种(“义务”),另外160种受益于bce提供的资源的濒危物种(“兼性”)。专性物种包括极度濒危的橙腹鹦鹉(Neophema chrysogaster),濒危的绿海龟(Chelonia mydas),澳大利亚海狮(Neophoca cinerea)和红树林蚁蓝蝴蝶(Acrodipsas illidgei)。专性物种表现出许多与高灭绝风险相关的特征,包括较小的家园范围,白天活动和食肉性饮食。栖息地丧失和退化共同威胁着91.7%的专性物种,其中大多数物种(90.9%)在澳大利亚面临这些威胁。专性物种,特别是无脊椎动物的现有信息存在显著差异,导致物种范围和对生物多样性的依赖程度存在更大的不确定性。随着栖息地的丧失和退化导致濒危物种的减少,未来蓝碳保护和恢复项目的保护重要性和潜在效益是显而易见的。我们的研究结果和网络工具通过促进目标物种的快速识别,以及特定物种的调查方法,种群轨迹和主要威胁来帮助项目规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
期刊最新文献
Connectivity structure in fragmented forest areas in the Brazilian Amazon Linking disperser traits and habitat quality to seed dispersal effectiveness Ecological trade-offs of mechanical thinning in temperate forests Taking the pulse of the world's raptors — A systematic quantitative review of wildlife rehabilitation centre admissions Recovery of tree-related microhabitats in a tropical rainforest after agricultural abandonment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1