Deficiency performance analysis of flag states using inspection data: A case study of Paris and Tokyo MoUs

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.012
Shanshan Fu , Yan Chen , Jihong Chen , Meiyu Shi , Lang Xu
{"title":"Deficiency performance analysis of flag states using inspection data: A case study of Paris and Tokyo MoUs","authors":"Shanshan Fu ,&nbsp;Yan Chen ,&nbsp;Jihong Chen ,&nbsp;Meiyu Shi ,&nbsp;Lang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flag state control (FSC) is crucial for maritime safety, but its effectiveness varies across flag states. A scientific assessment of FSC's effectiveness not only differentiates high-performing states from those with inadequate performance - prompting improvements among the latter - but also assists PSC organizations in evaluating flag states' performance during vessel selection, enabling more accurate targeting of inspections. Therefore, a multidimensional fixed-effects model is proposed to assess the effectiveness of FSC using inspection data from both Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU from 2017 to 2022. By comparing the results with the White, Grey, and Black (WGB) lists from the Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU, it is evident that the evaluated FSC's effectiveness of flag states generally aligns with the WGB lists and offers a more comprehensive assessment than those lists alone. Also, this paper estimates the effects of various factors, such as ship type and defect type, on the number of ship deficiencies. This offers valuable guidance for future efforts to mitigate ship deficiencies, enhancing overall maritime safety and operational efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"165 ","pages":"Pages 42-57"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flag state control (FSC) is crucial for maritime safety, but its effectiveness varies across flag states. A scientific assessment of FSC's effectiveness not only differentiates high-performing states from those with inadequate performance - prompting improvements among the latter - but also assists PSC organizations in evaluating flag states' performance during vessel selection, enabling more accurate targeting of inspections. Therefore, a multidimensional fixed-effects model is proposed to assess the effectiveness of FSC using inspection data from both Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU from 2017 to 2022. By comparing the results with the White, Grey, and Black (WGB) lists from the Paris MoU and Tokyo MoU, it is evident that the evaluated FSC's effectiveness of flag states generally aligns with the WGB lists and offers a more comprehensive assessment than those lists alone. Also, this paper estimates the effects of various factors, such as ship type and defect type, on the number of ship deficiencies. This offers valuable guidance for future efforts to mitigate ship deficiencies, enhancing overall maritime safety and operational efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用检验数据分析船旗国的绩效不足:以巴黎和东京谅解备忘录为例
船旗国管制(FSC)对海上安全至关重要,但其有效性因船旗国而异。对FSC有效性的科学评估不仅可以区分表现良好的国家和表现不佳的国家-促进后者的改进-而且还可以帮助PSC组织在船舶选择期间评估船旗国的表现,从而更准确地确定检查目标。因此,本文提出了一个多维固定效应模型,利用2017年至2022年巴黎谅解备忘录和东京谅解备忘录的检验数据来评估FSC的有效性。通过将结果与巴黎谅解备忘录和东京谅解备忘录中的白、灰、黑(WGB)清单进行比较,很明显,评估后的FSC对船旗国的有效性总体上与WGB清单一致,并且提供了比单独的WGB清单更全面的评估。此外,本文还估计了船舶类型和缺陷类型等各种因素对船舶缺陷数量的影响。这为未来减轻船舶缺陷、提高整体海上安全和运营效率的努力提供了宝贵的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
期刊最新文献
Impact of cycle lanes and public bike parking on bicycle commuting: How to achieve France’s cycling mode share target? Delivering accessible school transportation services in Canada's Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area: A study of education professionals' perspectives Differences in future car-purchase intentions between undergraduates from car-owning households and non-car households Rethinking corporate mobility management: Enhancing employee loyalty through corporate mobility and transportation offerings Port group integration and regional high-quality economic development: Mechanisms and spatial effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1