Does the financial reporting quality of private targets matter for deal timing? Evidence from European M&A

IF 6.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Research in International Business and Finance Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102794
Belén Gill-de-Albornoz , Marco Maffei , Flavio Spagnuolo
{"title":"Does the financial reporting quality of private targets matter for deal timing? Evidence from European M&A","authors":"Belén Gill-de-Albornoz ,&nbsp;Marco Maffei ,&nbsp;Flavio Spagnuolo","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate whether the financial reporting quality (FRQ) of privately-held targets influences deal timing dynamics in a sample of 1286 European mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A) operations announced during the years 2012–2023. Given the weak demand for high-FRQ in the private setting, the usefulness of the financial information of private firms is questionable and capital providers may prefer alternative solutions to reduce information asymmetry problems when valuing these targets. We address this empirical question running multivariate regression analyses to test the association between the deal timing and the private targets’ FRQ, proxied by accrual-based and non-accrual metrics. Our main results, interpreted through the lens of signalling theory, show that the deals are completed faster when private targets exhibit better FRQ. These findings suggest that acquirers rely on the deep analysis of private firms’ financial information to allocate their due diligence resources, supporting the usefulness of FRQ in the private setting. Additionally, we observe that the industry-relatedness nature of transactions shapes the strength of this association, and that in due diligence stage where acquirers can manage only a limited information released by sellers, the targets’ FRQ may become less useful. While the research reveals insights on the role of targets’ financial information in M&amp;A terms, it also suggests that policymakers should consider measures to strengthen reporting practices for private companies to reduce information asymmetry and enhance the efficiency of M&amp;A transactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102794"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925000509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate whether the financial reporting quality (FRQ) of privately-held targets influences deal timing dynamics in a sample of 1286 European mergers and acquisitions (M&A) operations announced during the years 2012–2023. Given the weak demand for high-FRQ in the private setting, the usefulness of the financial information of private firms is questionable and capital providers may prefer alternative solutions to reduce information asymmetry problems when valuing these targets. We address this empirical question running multivariate regression analyses to test the association between the deal timing and the private targets’ FRQ, proxied by accrual-based and non-accrual metrics. Our main results, interpreted through the lens of signalling theory, show that the deals are completed faster when private targets exhibit better FRQ. These findings suggest that acquirers rely on the deep analysis of private firms’ financial information to allocate their due diligence resources, supporting the usefulness of FRQ in the private setting. Additionally, we observe that the industry-relatedness nature of transactions shapes the strength of this association, and that in due diligence stage where acquirers can manage only a limited information released by sellers, the targets’ FRQ may become less useful. While the research reveals insights on the role of targets’ financial information in M&A terms, it also suggests that policymakers should consider measures to strengthen reporting practices for private companies to reduce information asymmetry and enhance the efficiency of M&A transactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私营目标公司的财务报告质量对交易时机有影响吗?欧洲并购的证据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
期刊最新文献
Leading or facilitating? —— The appropriate role of governmental venture capital in China The effects of disruptive technologies on accountability in fintech industry: Using bibliometric analysis to develop a research agenda Exit decisions of women entrepreneurs in resource-constrained environments Research on the impact of financial technology on risk-taking of commercial banks Sustainable financial inclusion through social progress and regularity quality interaction – Implication for least developed countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1