Belén Gill-de-Albornoz , Marco Maffei , Flavio Spagnuolo
{"title":"Does the financial reporting quality of private targets matter for deal timing? Evidence from European M&A","authors":"Belén Gill-de-Albornoz , Marco Maffei , Flavio Spagnuolo","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate whether the financial reporting quality (FRQ) of privately-held targets influences deal timing dynamics in a sample of 1286 European mergers and acquisitions (M&A) operations announced during the years 2012–2023. Given the weak demand for high-FRQ in the private setting, the usefulness of the financial information of private firms is questionable and capital providers may prefer alternative solutions to reduce information asymmetry problems when valuing these targets. We address this empirical question running multivariate regression analyses to test the association between the deal timing and the private targets’ FRQ, proxied by accrual-based and non-accrual metrics. Our main results, interpreted through the lens of signalling theory, show that the deals are completed faster when private targets exhibit better FRQ. These findings suggest that acquirers rely on the deep analysis of private firms’ financial information to allocate their due diligence resources, supporting the usefulness of FRQ in the private setting. Additionally, we observe that the industry-relatedness nature of transactions shapes the strength of this association, and that in due diligence stage where acquirers can manage only a limited information released by sellers, the targets’ FRQ may become less useful. While the research reveals insights on the role of targets’ financial information in M&A terms, it also suggests that policymakers should consider measures to strengthen reporting practices for private companies to reduce information asymmetry and enhance the efficiency of M&A transactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102794"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925000509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We investigate whether the financial reporting quality (FRQ) of privately-held targets influences deal timing dynamics in a sample of 1286 European mergers and acquisitions (M&A) operations announced during the years 2012–2023. Given the weak demand for high-FRQ in the private setting, the usefulness of the financial information of private firms is questionable and capital providers may prefer alternative solutions to reduce information asymmetry problems when valuing these targets. We address this empirical question running multivariate regression analyses to test the association between the deal timing and the private targets’ FRQ, proxied by accrual-based and non-accrual metrics. Our main results, interpreted through the lens of signalling theory, show that the deals are completed faster when private targets exhibit better FRQ. These findings suggest that acquirers rely on the deep analysis of private firms’ financial information to allocate their due diligence resources, supporting the usefulness of FRQ in the private setting. Additionally, we observe that the industry-relatedness nature of transactions shapes the strength of this association, and that in due diligence stage where acquirers can manage only a limited information released by sellers, the targets’ FRQ may become less useful. While the research reveals insights on the role of targets’ financial information in M&A terms, it also suggests that policymakers should consider measures to strengthen reporting practices for private companies to reduce information asymmetry and enhance the efficiency of M&A transactions.
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance