Rescue us all! the effects of the “rescued” claim for familiar and unfamiliar food ingredients

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Quality and Preference Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105462
Fernanda Silveira Carneiro , Steffen Jahn , Jessica Aschemann-Witzel , Yasemin Boztug
{"title":"Rescue us all! the effects of the “rescued” claim for familiar and unfamiliar food ingredients","authors":"Fernanda Silveira Carneiro ,&nbsp;Steffen Jahn ,&nbsp;Jessica Aschemann-Witzel ,&nbsp;Yasemin Boztug","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The United Nations has committed to halving food waste by 2030. In line with this goal, companies have started rescuing some foods that would otherwise be discarded and communicating it to their customers. These foods are repurposed as ingredients and marketed as upcycled or rescued. Notably, upcycled products (e.g., ice cream) can be made with rescued ingredients that are familiar (e.g., chocolate) or unfamiliar (e.g., malted milk) to consumers, which might affect how they are perceived. This research aims to investigate the impact of informing consumers about the “rescued” nature of ingredients. It also assesses how consumers' familiarity with these rescued ingredients moderates the effect on product perception and consumer behavior. We find that adding a “rescued” claim enhances a product's perceived sustainability and healthiness, positively influencing consumers' purchase intention. No significant effect of the claim on expected taste was observed. The effects of the claim on perceived sustainability and healthiness are more pronounced when consumers are already familiar with the rescued ingredient.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 105462"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United Nations has committed to halving food waste by 2030. In line with this goal, companies have started rescuing some foods that would otherwise be discarded and communicating it to their customers. These foods are repurposed as ingredients and marketed as upcycled or rescued. Notably, upcycled products (e.g., ice cream) can be made with rescued ingredients that are familiar (e.g., chocolate) or unfamiliar (e.g., malted milk) to consumers, which might affect how they are perceived. This research aims to investigate the impact of informing consumers about the “rescued” nature of ingredients. It also assesses how consumers' familiarity with these rescued ingredients moderates the effect on product perception and consumer behavior. We find that adding a “rescued” claim enhances a product's perceived sustainability and healthiness, positively influencing consumers' purchase intention. No significant effect of the claim on expected taste was observed. The effects of the claim on perceived sustainability and healthiness are more pronounced when consumers are already familiar with the rescued ingredient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
救救我们吧!对熟悉和不熟悉的食物成分的“获救”声明的效果
联合国已承诺到2030年将食物浪费减少一半。为了实现这一目标,公司已经开始拯救一些原本会被丢弃的食品,并向客户传达这些信息。这些食物被重新用作原料,并以升级回收或回收的方式销售。值得注意的是,升级回收的产品(如冰淇淋)可以用消费者熟悉的(如巧克力)或不熟悉的(如麦乳精)原料制成,这可能会影响消费者对它们的看法。本研究旨在调查告知消费者成分“获救”性质的影响。它还评估了消费者对这些获救成分的熟悉程度如何调节对产品感知和消费者行为的影响。我们发现,增加“获救”的声明可以提高产品的可持续性和健康性,并对消费者的购买意愿产生积极影响。没有观察到声明对预期味道的显著影响。当消费者已经熟悉这种被拯救的成分时,这种说法对可持续性和健康的影响就会更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
期刊最新文献
The suppression of moral engagement in consumer responses to animal slaughter Polychrome versus monochrome Nutri-Score shelf labels: An eye-tracking study of consumer attention and choice Effects of adding plant-based menu options on meat selection frequency: A randomized controlled experiment Consumer preferences for simultaneous presentation of nutrition and environmental labelling: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment at UK scale Multidimensional drivers of texture preference: Integrating oral behavior, tactile acuity and thermal taster status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1