Compensation strategies for renewable energy curtailment in South Korea

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114501
Jinah Noh , Jip Kim , Young-Jin Kim , Kwang Y. Lee , Seung-Mook Beak , Jung-Wook Park
{"title":"Compensation strategies for renewable energy curtailment in South Korea","authors":"Jinah Noh ,&nbsp;Jip Kim ,&nbsp;Young-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;Kwang Y. Lee ,&nbsp;Seung-Mook Beak ,&nbsp;Jung-Wook Park","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study proposes the systematic compensation strategies for renewable energy curtailment in South Korea. South Korea has experienced curtailment owing to an increase in renewable energy. However, there is no systematic systems for curtailment compensation in South Korea, and the renewable energy producers bear all the losses. Although the country's goal is to expand renewable energy, the absence of compensation for curtailment deters investments in renewable energy. This study categorizes the causes of renewable energy curtailment in South Korea by reviewing domestic regulations and international experiences. Using the classified causes, it proposes a method for accurately identifying the causes of curtailment through variations in constraints when the unit commitment model is applied. This study also provides a strategy to compensate for the losses of each generator according to the compensation criteria. The proposed strategy and its effectiveness are evaluated through scenario-based simulations. The results demonstrate that the proposed compensation strategy provides an equilibrium of curtailment responsibility between grid operators and renewable energy producers. This study aims to contribute to the achievement of South Korea's national energy transition goals by providing a systematic framework to encourage continued investment in renewable energy, particularly during the transition to market-based operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 114501"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525000084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study proposes the systematic compensation strategies for renewable energy curtailment in South Korea. South Korea has experienced curtailment owing to an increase in renewable energy. However, there is no systematic systems for curtailment compensation in South Korea, and the renewable energy producers bear all the losses. Although the country's goal is to expand renewable energy, the absence of compensation for curtailment deters investments in renewable energy. This study categorizes the causes of renewable energy curtailment in South Korea by reviewing domestic regulations and international experiences. Using the classified causes, it proposes a method for accurately identifying the causes of curtailment through variations in constraints when the unit commitment model is applied. This study also provides a strategy to compensate for the losses of each generator according to the compensation criteria. The proposed strategy and its effectiveness are evaluated through scenario-based simulations. The results demonstrate that the proposed compensation strategy provides an equilibrium of curtailment responsibility between grid operators and renewable energy producers. This study aims to contribute to the achievement of South Korea's national energy transition goals by providing a systematic framework to encourage continued investment in renewable energy, particularly during the transition to market-based operations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国可再生能源弃电补偿策略
本研究提出了韩国可再生能源弃电的系统补偿策略。由于可再生能源的增加,韩国经历了弃电。然而,韩国没有系统的弃风补偿制度,可再生能源生产商承担了所有损失。尽管该国的目标是扩大可再生能源,但缺乏对弃电的补偿阻碍了对可再生能源的投资。本研究通过回顾国内法规和国际经验,对韩国可再生能源弃电的原因进行了分类。利用分类后的原因,提出了在应用机组承诺模型时,通过约束条件的变化来准确识别弃电原因的方法。本文还提出了一种根据补偿准则对每台发电机的损失进行补偿的策略。通过基于场景的仿真对所提出的策略及其有效性进行了评估。结果表明,所提出的补偿策略在电网运营商和可再生能源生产商之间提供了一个弃风责任的平衡。本研究旨在通过提供一个系统的框架来鼓励对可再生能源的持续投资,特别是在向市场化运营过渡的过程中,为实现韩国的国家能源转型目标做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Energy policy sequencing for SDG-aligned transitions in East Asia–Pacific: Evidence of stage-dependent effects and threshold dynamics Multidimensional income quality: A new lens on energy poverty in rural China Community benefit agreement preferences for energy development offshore California, Oregon, and Washington: Insights from a choice-based conjoint experiment Women's political empowerment and electricity affordability: A spatial analysis Insulating inequality: Limits of housing retrofit subsidies in tackling energy poverty in Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1