Ochieng Justus, Joel Maina, Doug White, Jean Claude Rubyogo, Eric Nduwarugira, Eliud Birachi, Ruth Chepchirchir, Enid Katungi, Eileen Nchanji, Sylvia Kalemera, Mercy Mutua, Andrew Chiwawa, Blaise Ndabashinze, Bararyenya Astère, Nepomuscene Ntukamazina, Shylet Tsekenedza
{"title":"Economic Viability of Scaling Improved Bean Technologies in Burundi and Zimbabwe","authors":"Ochieng Justus, Joel Maina, Doug White, Jean Claude Rubyogo, Eric Nduwarugira, Eliud Birachi, Ruth Chepchirchir, Enid Katungi, Eileen Nchanji, Sylvia Kalemera, Mercy Mutua, Andrew Chiwawa, Blaise Ndabashinze, Bararyenya Astère, Nepomuscene Ntukamazina, Shylet Tsekenedza","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scaling improved bean varieties and complementary technologies are important to improve crop productivity incomes and food and nutrition security in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Burundi and Zimbabwe, bean technologies were promoted through a demand-led and public–private partnership model. While econometric approaches have been used to estimate the impact of enhanced technologies on farmers' livelihoods for a long time, no economic feasibility analysis has been done. Most analyses focus on farmers livelihoods, overlooking other value chain actors like traders, processors, and seed producers including community seed multipliers. Thus, this study contributes to the literature by conducting an economic feasibility analysis that includes all actors in the bean value chain and estimates additional investments attracted from public and private stakeholders. We further identified gains or losses on account of the externalities generated through different value chain actors. We find positive net present values (NPV) and a benefit–cost ratio (BCR) greater than one. This implies that the economic benefits of the bean value chain improvement program in the two countries are larger than their costs. Farmers and traders are the main beneficiaries, receiving 99% and 65% of the net economic benefits generated in the bean value chain in Burundi and Zimbabwe, respectively. Finally, we find the intervention sustainable and resilient against economic shocks, making it worth replicating in other countries in sub-Sahara Africa and beyond. Pragmatic and policy options are recommended to inform future interventions of a similar nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scaling improved bean varieties and complementary technologies are important to improve crop productivity incomes and food and nutrition security in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Burundi and Zimbabwe, bean technologies were promoted through a demand-led and public–private partnership model. While econometric approaches have been used to estimate the impact of enhanced technologies on farmers' livelihoods for a long time, no economic feasibility analysis has been done. Most analyses focus on farmers livelihoods, overlooking other value chain actors like traders, processors, and seed producers including community seed multipliers. Thus, this study contributes to the literature by conducting an economic feasibility analysis that includes all actors in the bean value chain and estimates additional investments attracted from public and private stakeholders. We further identified gains or losses on account of the externalities generated through different value chain actors. We find positive net present values (NPV) and a benefit–cost ratio (BCR) greater than one. This implies that the economic benefits of the bean value chain improvement program in the two countries are larger than their costs. Farmers and traders are the main beneficiaries, receiving 99% and 65% of the net economic benefits generated in the bean value chain in Burundi and Zimbabwe, respectively. Finally, we find the intervention sustainable and resilient against economic shocks, making it worth replicating in other countries in sub-Sahara Africa and beyond. Pragmatic and policy options are recommended to inform future interventions of a similar nature.
期刊介绍:
Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor.
Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights.
Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge.
Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include:
• Agronomy
• Biotechnological Approaches
• Breeding & Genetics
• Climate Change
• Quality and Composition
• Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks
• Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry
• Functional Genomics
• Molecular Biology
• Pest and Disease Management
• Post Harvest Biology
• Soil Science
• Systems Biology