Skye Brugler, David E. Clay, Deepak Joshi, Donna M. Rizzo, Sharon A. Clay, Thandi Nleya, Gary Hatfield
{"title":"Does splitting the nitrogen rate for corn (Zea mays) reduce the carbon dioxide equivalence?","authors":"Skye Brugler, David E. Clay, Deepak Joshi, Donna M. Rizzo, Sharon A. Clay, Thandi Nleya, Gary Hatfield","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Splitting N fertilizer application between the corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) plants pre-emergence and vegetative growth stage has the potential to reduce N losses while increasing N use efficiency. However, there are few published reports that show that splitting fertilizer reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, this study compared the CO<sub>2e</sub> (carbon dioxide equivalent) calculated from N<sub>2</sub>O-N and CO<sub>2</sub>-C emissions from a single pre-emergence application of 157 kg urea- N ha<sup>−1</sup> with a nonfertilized control and two applications of 78.5 kg urea-N ha<sup>−1</sup> that were applied at pre-emergence and at the corn plants V6 growth stage. Over three growing seasons (2021, 2022, and 2023), soil temperature, moisture, N<sub>2</sub>O-N and CO<sub>2</sub>-C emissions were measured six times per day from when the urea was applied to harvest. N<sub>2</sub>O-N and CO<sub>2</sub>-C emissions were separated into pre-split and post-split periods, and carbon dioxide equivalence was calculated. Splitting the N rate: (1) increased N<sub>2</sub>O-N emissions in 2021 and 2022; (2) reduced CO<sub>2</sub>-C emissions during the post-split period in 2022 and 2023; and (3) did not influence total CO<sub>2e</sub> in 2021 and reduced CO<sub>2e</sub> emissions in 2022 and 2023. Based on these results, splitting the N fertilizer rate between pre-emergence and the corn plants V6 growth stage should be considered as a potential climate smart practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Splitting N fertilizer application between the corn (Zea mays) plants pre-emergence and vegetative growth stage has the potential to reduce N losses while increasing N use efficiency. However, there are few published reports that show that splitting fertilizer reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, this study compared the CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) calculated from N2O-N and CO2-C emissions from a single pre-emergence application of 157 kg urea- N ha−1 with a nonfertilized control and two applications of 78.5 kg urea-N ha−1 that were applied at pre-emergence and at the corn plants V6 growth stage. Over three growing seasons (2021, 2022, and 2023), soil temperature, moisture, N2O-N and CO2-C emissions were measured six times per day from when the urea was applied to harvest. N2O-N and CO2-C emissions were separated into pre-split and post-split periods, and carbon dioxide equivalence was calculated. Splitting the N rate: (1) increased N2O-N emissions in 2021 and 2022; (2) reduced CO2-C emissions during the post-split period in 2022 and 2023; and (3) did not influence total CO2e in 2021 and reduced CO2e emissions in 2022 and 2023. Based on these results, splitting the N fertilizer rate between pre-emergence and the corn plants V6 growth stage should be considered as a potential climate smart practice.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.