Differences in Arid Region Water Values Across Sectors: A Discussion of Potential Water Market Activity and Trading Barriers in South Central Texas

IF 2.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of The American Water Resources Association Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1111/1752-1688.70001
Chengcheng J. Fei, Bruce A. McCarl, Anastasia W. Thayer, Aurora Vargas, Yingqian Yang
{"title":"Differences in Arid Region Water Values Across Sectors: A Discussion of Potential Water Market Activity and Trading Barriers in South Central Texas","authors":"Chengcheng J. Fei,&nbsp;Bruce A. McCarl,&nbsp;Anastasia W. Thayer,&nbsp;Aurora Vargas,&nbsp;Yingqian Yang","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In water-scarce arid regions, water trading is often proposed to increase resource use efficiency. For a potential water market to function effectively, several conditions must be met, including clearly defined and limited water rights, varying water values among users, and the absence of barriers to transfer water. Conceptually, when high-value users face water shortages due to drought or limited water rights, they may purchase or lease water rights from low-value users. In this paper, we examine water use values across users in the arid water-scarce region of South-Central Texas, as a case study, using a mix of market and nonmarket valuation approaches. This mix of methodological approaches provides results based on actual purchases, comparable sales, land rental rates, source replacement, and water-conserving investment. Our results show considerable differences among sectoral water use values, with the lowest in agriculture and the highest for municipalities, and energy fracking. These differences suggest the potential for a broader regional water market that would increase water usage efficiency. We also explore explanations for the differences, including a thorough discussion of issues involved with trading restrictions, industry characteristics, and physical geography.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In water-scarce arid regions, water trading is often proposed to increase resource use efficiency. For a potential water market to function effectively, several conditions must be met, including clearly defined and limited water rights, varying water values among users, and the absence of barriers to transfer water. Conceptually, when high-value users face water shortages due to drought or limited water rights, they may purchase or lease water rights from low-value users. In this paper, we examine water use values across users in the arid water-scarce region of South-Central Texas, as a case study, using a mix of market and nonmarket valuation approaches. This mix of methodological approaches provides results based on actual purchases, comparable sales, land rental rates, source replacement, and water-conserving investment. Our results show considerable differences among sectoral water use values, with the lowest in agriculture and the highest for municipalities, and energy fracking. These differences suggest the potential for a broader regional water market that would increase water usage efficiency. We also explore explanations for the differences, including a thorough discussion of issues involved with trading restrictions, industry characteristics, and physical geography.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在缺水的干旱地区,人们经常建议通过水交易来提高资源利用效率。要使潜在的水市场有效运作,必须满足几个条件,包括明确界定的有限水权、用户之间不同的水价值以及不存在调水障碍。从概念上讲,当干旱或有限水权导致高价值用户缺水时,他们可能会购买或租赁低价值用户的水权。在本文中,我们以得克萨斯州中南部干旱缺水地区为例,采用市场和非市场估值相结合的方法研究了不同用户的用水价值。这种方法组合提供了基于实际购买、可比销售、土地出租率、水源替代和节水投资的结果。我们的结果显示,各行业用水价值之间存在很大差异,农业用水价值最低,市政用水价值最高,能源裂解用水价值最高。这些差异表明,更广泛的区域水资源市场具有提高用水效率的潜力。我们还探讨了造成这些差异的原因,包括对交易限制、行业特征和自然地理等问题的深入讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The American Water Resources Association
Journal of The American Water Resources Association 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy. JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.
期刊最新文献
Alternative Computational Approach Improving Hydrologic Design of Low-Impact Development Facilities Transitioning to Multi-Purpose Reservoirs: Advancing Performance With Forecast-Based Pre-Release Operations Leveraging High-Frequency Sensor Data and U.S. National Water Model Output to Forecast Turbidity in a Drinking Water Supply Basin A Stakeholder-Driven Approach for Enhancing Streamflow Monitoring Networks in Louisiana, USA The Effects of Unpaved Roads on Instream Sediment: Patterns and Challenges for Monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1