The Impact of clinically significant pleural effusion on survival of US Veterans with cancer, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study (VALUES).

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003
Amit Chopra, Kurt Hu, Darren E Gemoets, Marc A Judson
{"title":"The Impact of clinically significant pleural effusion on survival of US Veterans with cancer, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study (VALUES).","authors":"Amit Chopra, Kurt Hu, Darren E Gemoets, Marc A Judson","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous clinical data suggest that the presence of a pleural effusion is associated with poor survival. However, these studies were limited by either a small sample size or lack of an adequate control group.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>What is the impact of pleural effusion on survival in patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of the three most common etiologies of pleural effusion: Cancer, congestive heart failure or pneumonia?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of US veterans hospitalized between January 1<sup>st</sup>,2000 to December 31<sup>st</sup>,2020. International classification of disease codes were used to identify patients with an admitting diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, or cancer. Patients were dichotomized as having a clinically significant pleural effusion (PE) when a pleural effusion drainage was performed or not (NO-PE). All-cause mortality was compared between the PE and NO-PE cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 34,707 patients in the PE group and 792,217 patients in the NO-PE group. Patients with PE had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to patients with NO-PE. The median survival time was significantly lower in PE group as compared to NO-PE group across all three diagnosis, CHF (PE: 1.51 years; 95% CI: 1.40-1.61 vs NO-PE: 3.23 years; 95% CI: 3.21-3.26), Cancer (PE:1.33 years; 95% CI 1.27,1.39 vs NO-PE: 2.05 years; 95% CI:2.02-2.08) and pneumonia (PE: 4.27 years; 95% CI: 3.94-4.61 vs NO-PE: 5.11 years, 95% CI: 5.06-5.15). The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with admitting diagnosis of CHF, cancer and pneumonia. Clinicians and researchers should consider the association of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia with pleural effusions when estimating the prognosis of individual patients and when assessing the survival of longitudinal cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous clinical data suggest that the presence of a pleural effusion is associated with poor survival. However, these studies were limited by either a small sample size or lack of an adequate control group.

Research questions: What is the impact of pleural effusion on survival in patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of the three most common etiologies of pleural effusion: Cancer, congestive heart failure or pneumonia?

Study design and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of US veterans hospitalized between January 1st,2000 to December 31st,2020. International classification of disease codes were used to identify patients with an admitting diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, or cancer. Patients were dichotomized as having a clinically significant pleural effusion (PE) when a pleural effusion drainage was performed or not (NO-PE). All-cause mortality was compared between the PE and NO-PE cohort.

Results: We analyzed 34,707 patients in the PE group and 792,217 patients in the NO-PE group. Patients with PE had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to patients with NO-PE. The median survival time was significantly lower in PE group as compared to NO-PE group across all three diagnosis, CHF (PE: 1.51 years; 95% CI: 1.40-1.61 vs NO-PE: 3.23 years; 95% CI: 3.21-3.26), Cancer (PE:1.33 years; 95% CI 1.27,1.39 vs NO-PE: 2.05 years; 95% CI:2.02-2.08) and pneumonia (PE: 4.27 years; 95% CI: 3.94-4.61 vs NO-PE: 5.11 years, 95% CI: 5.06-5.15). The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.

Interpretation: The presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with admitting diagnosis of CHF, cancer and pneumonia. Clinicians and researchers should consider the association of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia with pleural effusions when estimating the prognosis of individual patients and when assessing the survival of longitudinal cohorts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Continuous glucose monitoring for hyperglycemia in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Does the Reversal and Normalization of Airway and Pulmonary Vascular Remodeling Accompany Asthma Remission? The Impact of clinically significant pleural effusion on survival of US Veterans with cancer, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study (VALUES). The Association of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities and Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) with Mortality. High Flow Nasal Cannula Liberation: Who, When, and How?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1