The Impact of clinically significant pleural effusion on survival of US Veterans with cancer, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study (VALUES).
Amit Chopra, Kurt Hu, Darren E Gemoets, Marc A Judson
{"title":"The Impact of clinically significant pleural effusion on survival of US Veterans with cancer, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia: The Veterans Administration Lung Effusion Study (VALUES).","authors":"Amit Chopra, Kurt Hu, Darren E Gemoets, Marc A Judson","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous clinical data suggest that the presence of a pleural effusion is associated with poor survival. However, these studies were limited by either a small sample size or lack of an adequate control group.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>What is the impact of pleural effusion on survival in patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of the three most common etiologies of pleural effusion: Cancer, congestive heart failure or pneumonia?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of US veterans hospitalized between January 1<sup>st</sup>,2000 to December 31<sup>st</sup>,2020. International classification of disease codes were used to identify patients with an admitting diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, or cancer. Patients were dichotomized as having a clinically significant pleural effusion (PE) when a pleural effusion drainage was performed or not (NO-PE). All-cause mortality was compared between the PE and NO-PE cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 34,707 patients in the PE group and 792,217 patients in the NO-PE group. Patients with PE had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to patients with NO-PE. The median survival time was significantly lower in PE group as compared to NO-PE group across all three diagnosis, CHF (PE: 1.51 years; 95% CI: 1.40-1.61 vs NO-PE: 3.23 years; 95% CI: 3.21-3.26), Cancer (PE:1.33 years; 95% CI 1.27,1.39 vs NO-PE: 2.05 years; 95% CI:2.02-2.08) and pneumonia (PE: 4.27 years; 95% CI: 3.94-4.61 vs NO-PE: 5.11 years, 95% CI: 5.06-5.15). The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with admitting diagnosis of CHF, cancer and pneumonia. Clinicians and researchers should consider the association of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia with pleural effusions when estimating the prognosis of individual patients and when assessing the survival of longitudinal cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Previous clinical data suggest that the presence of a pleural effusion is associated with poor survival. However, these studies were limited by either a small sample size or lack of an adequate control group.
Research questions: What is the impact of pleural effusion on survival in patients hospitalized with an admitting diagnosis of the three most common etiologies of pleural effusion: Cancer, congestive heart failure or pneumonia?
Study design and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of US veterans hospitalized between January 1st,2000 to December 31st,2020. International classification of disease codes were used to identify patients with an admitting diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia, or cancer. Patients were dichotomized as having a clinically significant pleural effusion (PE) when a pleural effusion drainage was performed or not (NO-PE). All-cause mortality was compared between the PE and NO-PE cohort.
Results: We analyzed 34,707 patients in the PE group and 792,217 patients in the NO-PE group. Patients with PE had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to patients with NO-PE. The median survival time was significantly lower in PE group as compared to NO-PE group across all three diagnosis, CHF (PE: 1.51 years; 95% CI: 1.40-1.61 vs NO-PE: 3.23 years; 95% CI: 3.21-3.26), Cancer (PE:1.33 years; 95% CI 1.27,1.39 vs NO-PE: 2.05 years; 95% CI:2.02-2.08) and pneumonia (PE: 4.27 years; 95% CI: 3.94-4.61 vs NO-PE: 5.11 years, 95% CI: 5.06-5.15). The hazard ratio of all-cause mortality remained unchanged after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities.
Interpretation: The presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality in patients with admitting diagnosis of CHF, cancer and pneumonia. Clinicians and researchers should consider the association of CHF, cancer, and pneumonia with pleural effusions when estimating the prognosis of individual patients and when assessing the survival of longitudinal cohorts.
期刊介绍:
At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.