Chemo-conization in Early-sTage cERvical caNcer >2 cm scheduled for fertilItY-sparing approach: an analysis of the ETERNITY project.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101643
Giorgio Bogani, Giovanni Scambia, Mario Malzoni, Jvan Casarin, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Frédéric Amant, Francesco Raspagliesi
{"title":"Chemo-conization in Early-sTage cERvical caNcer >2 cm scheduled for fertilItY-sparing approach: an analysis of the ETERNITY project.","authors":"Giorgio Bogani, Giovanni Scambia, Mario Malzoni, Jvan Casarin, Giuseppe Vizzielli, Frédéric Amant, Francesco Raspagliesi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conization in early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size >2 cm using a fertility-sparing approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ETERNITY project is a retrospective, multi-institutional study that collected data from patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing fertility-sparing treatment. In the present study, we report the outcomes of stage IB2 to IB3 cervical cancer undergoing nodal assessment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and conization. A propensity-matching algorithm was used to compare patients who underwent upfront radical surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 395 patients were included in the ETERNITY project. Among these, 25 underwent a fertility-sparing attempt with nodal assessment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and conization. The median (range) patient age was 37 (24-41) years. Four (16%) patients with positive nodes required definitive chemo-radiation. Twenty-one (84%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two (8%) patients with stable disease underwent radical hysterectomy, whereas the remaining 19 (76%) patients who achieved a clinical response underwent cervical conization. Three (12%) patients underwent radical hysterectomy owing to persistent positive margins, leaving 16 (64%) patients who completed the planned fertility-sparing attempt. After a median (range) follow-up of 36.2 (21.9-88) months, 3 recurrences occurred. Two patients with cervical recurrence underwent hysterectomy, while 1 patient who received definitive chemoradiotherapy owing to the presence of positive nodes developed distant recurrence. Regarding obstetric outcomes, 6 patients attempted to conceive, and 4 (66.7%) pregnancies were achieved (1 was achieved with assisted reproductive technology). In a propensity-matched group of patients who underwent upfront radical surgery, no differences in morbidity or survival rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization should be investigated in selected patients with cervical cancer who wish to preserve their childbearing potential. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the long-term safety and identify predictors of response.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial identifier: </strong>NCT06351228.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101643"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and conization in early-stage cervical cancer with a tumor size >2 cm using a fertility-sparing approach.

Methods: The ETERNITY project is a retrospective, multi-institutional study that collected data from patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing fertility-sparing treatment. In the present study, we report the outcomes of stage IB2 to IB3 cervical cancer undergoing nodal assessment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and conization. A propensity-matching algorithm was used to compare patients who underwent upfront radical surgery.

Results: A total of 395 patients were included in the ETERNITY project. Among these, 25 underwent a fertility-sparing attempt with nodal assessment, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and conization. The median (range) patient age was 37 (24-41) years. Four (16%) patients with positive nodes required definitive chemo-radiation. Twenty-one (84%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two (8%) patients with stable disease underwent radical hysterectomy, whereas the remaining 19 (76%) patients who achieved a clinical response underwent cervical conization. Three (12%) patients underwent radical hysterectomy owing to persistent positive margins, leaving 16 (64%) patients who completed the planned fertility-sparing attempt. After a median (range) follow-up of 36.2 (21.9-88) months, 3 recurrences occurred. Two patients with cervical recurrence underwent hysterectomy, while 1 patient who received definitive chemoradiotherapy owing to the presence of positive nodes developed distant recurrence. Regarding obstetric outcomes, 6 patients attempted to conceive, and 4 (66.7%) pregnancies were achieved (1 was achieved with assisted reproductive technology). In a propensity-matched group of patients who underwent upfront radical surgery, no differences in morbidity or survival rates were recorded.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization should be investigated in selected patients with cervical cancer who wish to preserve their childbearing potential. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the long-term safety and identify predictors of response.

Clinical trial identifier: NCT06351228.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗在早期宫颈癌bb0 2cm预定生育保留方法:一个分析的永恒项目。
目的:探讨保留生育入路新辅助化疗治疗肿瘤大小为bb0 ~ 2cm的早期宫颈癌的安全性。方法:ETERNITY项目是一项回顾性、多机构研究,收集了接受保留生育治疗的早期宫颈癌患者的数据。在本研究中,我们报告了IB2至IB3期宫颈癌进行淋巴结评估、新辅助化疗和锥化的结果。一种倾向匹配算法用于比较接受前期根治性手术的患者。结果:共有395例患者纳入了ETERNITY项目。其中,25例接受了保留生育能力的尝试,包括淋巴结评估、新辅助化疗和锥化。患者年龄中位数(范围)为37岁(24-41岁)。4例(16%)淋巴结阳性患者需要明确的化疗放疗。21例(84%)患者接受了新辅助化疗。2例(8%)病情稳定的患者行根治性子宫切除术,其余19例(76%)临床缓解的患者行宫颈锥切术。3例(12%)患者由于边缘持续阳性而接受根治性子宫切除术,剩下16例(64%)患者完成了计划生育保留尝试。中位(范围)随访36.2(21.9-88)个月后,出现3例复发。2例宫颈复发患者行子宫切除术,1例因淋巴结阳性而接受放化疗的患者发生远处复发。产科结果方面,6例患者尝试怀孕,4例(66.7%)成功妊娠(1例采用辅助生殖技术)。在倾向匹配的一组接受了前期根治性手术的患者中,发病率和生存率没有记录差异。结论:对于希望保留生育能力的宫颈癌患者,应研究新辅助化疗后锥形切除术。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来评估长期安全性并确定反应的预测因素。临床试验标识符:NCT06351228。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
Letter in response to correspondence on "Comparative analysis of adjuvant treatment outcomes in stage III endometrial cancer: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, site of primary recurrence, and toxicity" by Fang & Hu. Primary Vaginal Melanoma. Treatment modality-specific survival of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix with T1b3-2b classifications. Response to immuno-targeted therapy in recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Prophylactic extended-field radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1