Liat Hogen, Thirushi Siriwardena, Lina Salman, Marcus Q Bernardini, Sarah E Ferguson, Stephane Laframboise, Genevieve Bouchard-Fortier, Eshetu G Atenafu, Taymaa May
{"title":"Factors influencing surgeons' decision for diverting ileostomy and associated complications in ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery.","authors":"Liat Hogen, Thirushi Siriwardena, Lina Salman, Marcus Q Bernardini, Sarah E Ferguson, Stephane Laframboise, Genevieve Bouchard-Fortier, Eshetu G Atenafu, Taymaa May","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors influencing the decision to perform diverting ileostomy during cytoreductive surgery with colon resection for advanced ovarian cancer and investigate the associated complications and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery with colon resection and re-anastomosis between January 2010 and July 2020. Multivariate analysis was performed on the factors contributing to diverting ileostomy identified in the univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 134 patients, 60 (44.8%) underwent diverting ileostomies. The median follow-up was 35.75 months (range; 0.03-145.05) and the median age was 57 (range; 26-86). The anastomotic leakage rate was 3.7% (n = 5). On the univariate analysis, longer operative time (10 vs 6.4 hours), multiple bowel resections (>1 vs 1 hour), total colon resection length, pre-operative paracentesis, intraoperative ascites, and transfusion were associated with diverting ileostomy. In the multivariate analysis, longer operative time (OR 1.61, p < .0001) and total colon resection length (OR 1.06, p = .027) remained significant. Diverting ileostomy was associated with higher rates of intensive care unit admission (14.3% vs 2.8%, p = .001), dehydration (40% vs 9.5%, p < .0001), and acute kidney injury (16.4% vs 1.4%, p = .002). The median progression-free survival was similar (23.87 vs 21.24 months in non-diverted vs diverted ileostomy, p = .82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer operative time and total length of colon resection influenced the selection of diverting ileostomy. The patients selected for diversion underwent multiple bowel resections more frequently, received more transfusions, and developed intraoperative ascites. These findings suggest that surgeons favor diversion for more extensive procedures. Patients who underwent diverted ileostomy experienced more short-term complications, likely reflecting the surgical complexity. Progression-free survival remained similar between the 2 groups, with diverse patients experiencing stoma-related morbidity over time, mainly dehydration and acute kidney injury. A prospective model to predict anastomotic leak risk may reduce diverting ileostomy rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"101640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101640","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify factors influencing the decision to perform diverting ileostomy during cytoreductive surgery with colon resection for advanced ovarian cancer and investigate the associated complications and survival outcomes.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent cytoreductive surgery with colon resection and re-anastomosis between January 2010 and July 2020. Multivariate analysis was performed on the factors contributing to diverting ileostomy identified in the univariate analysis.
Results: Of the 134 patients, 60 (44.8%) underwent diverting ileostomies. The median follow-up was 35.75 months (range; 0.03-145.05) and the median age was 57 (range; 26-86). The anastomotic leakage rate was 3.7% (n = 5). On the univariate analysis, longer operative time (10 vs 6.4 hours), multiple bowel resections (>1 vs 1 hour), total colon resection length, pre-operative paracentesis, intraoperative ascites, and transfusion were associated with diverting ileostomy. In the multivariate analysis, longer operative time (OR 1.61, p < .0001) and total colon resection length (OR 1.06, p = .027) remained significant. Diverting ileostomy was associated with higher rates of intensive care unit admission (14.3% vs 2.8%, p = .001), dehydration (40% vs 9.5%, p < .0001), and acute kidney injury (16.4% vs 1.4%, p = .002). The median progression-free survival was similar (23.87 vs 21.24 months in non-diverted vs diverted ileostomy, p = .82).
Conclusions: Longer operative time and total length of colon resection influenced the selection of diverting ileostomy. The patients selected for diversion underwent multiple bowel resections more frequently, received more transfusions, and developed intraoperative ascites. These findings suggest that surgeons favor diversion for more extensive procedures. Patients who underwent diverted ileostomy experienced more short-term complications, likely reflecting the surgical complexity. Progression-free survival remained similar between the 2 groups, with diverse patients experiencing stoma-related morbidity over time, mainly dehydration and acute kidney injury. A prospective model to predict anastomotic leak risk may reduce diverting ileostomy rates.
目的:本研究旨在确定影响晚期卵巢癌细胞减少手术合并结肠切除时是否行回肠造口转移的因素,并探讨相关并发症和生存结果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2010年1月至2020年7月期间接受结肠切除和再吻合手术的晚期卵巢癌患者。对单因素分析中确定的导致回肠造口转移的因素进行多因素分析。结果:134例患者中,60例(44.8%)行回肠分流造口术。中位随访时间为35.75个月(范围;0.03-145.05),中位年龄为57岁(范围;26 - 86)。吻合口漏率为3.7% (n = 5)。在单因素分析中,较长的手术时间(10 vs 6.4小时)、多次肠切除术(bbb10 vs 1小时)、结肠切除总长度、术前穿刺、术中腹水和输血与回肠造口转移相关。在多因素分析中,更长的手术时间(OR 1.61, p < 0.0001)和结肠切除总长度(OR 1.06, p = 0.027)仍然具有显著性。转道回肠造口术与较高的重症监护病房住院率(14.3% vs 2.8%, p = 0.001)、脱水(40% vs 9.5%, p < 0.001)和急性肾损伤(16.4% vs 1.4%, p = 0.001)相关。中位无进展生存期相似(23.87个月vs 21.24个月,p = 0.82)。结论:较长的手术时间和结肠切除总长度影响回肠吻合术的选择。选择转流的患者更频繁地进行多次肠切除术,接受更多的输血,并发生术中腹水。这些发现表明外科医生倾向于进行更广泛的手术。行回肠造口术的患者有更多的短期并发症,可能反映了手术的复杂性。两组的无进展生存率相似,不同的患者随着时间的推移出现了与气孔相关的发病率,主要是脱水和急性肾损伤。一个预测吻合口漏风险的前瞻性模型可能会降低转移回肠造口率。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.