Biosimilars and immunogenicity: a matter of concern?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2467817
Anan S Jarab, Shrouq R Abu Heshmeh, Ahmad Z Al Meslamani
{"title":"Biosimilars and immunogenicity: a matter of concern?","authors":"Anan S Jarab, Shrouq R Abu Heshmeh, Ahmad Z Al Meslamani","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biosimilars have transformed treatment modalities across various medical fields such as oncology, rheumatology, and immunology. Despite their potential for reducing healthcare costs, concerns persist regarding their ability to induce an immune response, which could affect efficacy and safety. This review critically evaluates the current evidence on the immunogenicity of biosimilars and discusses the regulatory frameworks guiding their approval and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review includes studies from databases like Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, published up to April 2024. It explores the 'totality of the evidence' approach used by regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA, detailing analytical, preclinical, and clinical assessments that ensure biosimilars' similarity to their reference products in terms of structure, function, and clinical outcomes. The review also addresses the challenges and limitations in current research methodologies and the implications of immunogenicity on therapeutic efficacy and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While substantial evidence confirms the safety and efficacy of biosimilars, the review emphasizes the need for continuous regulatory vigilance and advanced methodologies in post-marketing surveillance to capture long-term immunogenicity data effectively. It advocates for integrating cutting-edge analytical techniques and personalized medicine to better manage immunogenic risks associated with biological therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biosimilars have transformed treatment modalities across various medical fields such as oncology, rheumatology, and immunology. Despite their potential for reducing healthcare costs, concerns persist regarding their ability to induce an immune response, which could affect efficacy and safety. This review critically evaluates the current evidence on the immunogenicity of biosimilars and discusses the regulatory frameworks guiding their approval and monitoring.

Areas covered: This review includes studies from databases like Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect, published up to April 2024. It explores the 'totality of the evidence' approach used by regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA, detailing analytical, preclinical, and clinical assessments that ensure biosimilars' similarity to their reference products in terms of structure, function, and clinical outcomes. The review also addresses the challenges and limitations in current research methodologies and the implications of immunogenicity on therapeutic efficacy and patient safety.

Expert opinion: While substantial evidence confirms the safety and efficacy of biosimilars, the review emphasizes the need for continuous regulatory vigilance and advanced methodologies in post-marketing surveillance to capture long-term immunogenicity data effectively. It advocates for integrating cutting-edge analytical techniques and personalized medicine to better manage immunogenic risks associated with biological therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介:生物仿制药改变了肿瘤学、风湿病学和免疫学等各个医学领域的治疗模式。尽管生物仿制药具有降低医疗成本的潜力,但人们对其诱导免疫反应的能力仍然存在担忧,这可能会影响疗效和安全性。本综述批判性地评估了生物仿制药免疫原性的现有证据,并讨论了指导其审批和监测的监管框架:本综述包括 Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science 和 ScienceDirect 等数据库中截至 2024 年 4 月发表的研究。本综述探讨了 FDA 和 EMA 等监管机构采用的 "全面证据 "方法,详细介绍了确保生物仿制药在结构、功能和临床结果方面与其参照产品相似的分析、临床前和临床评估。本综述还探讨了当前研究方法的挑战和局限性,以及免疫原性对疗效和患者安全的影响:专家意见:虽然大量证据证实了生物仿制药的安全性和有效性,但该综述强调,在上市后监测方面,监管部门需要持续保持警惕,并采用先进的方法来有效捕捉长期免疫原性数据。它主张将尖端分析技术与个性化医疗相结合,以更好地管理与生物疗法相关的免疫原性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Comparative safety analysis of Hedgehog inhibitor preparations: insights from the FAERS database. Hepatic adverse events associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS database and analysis of drug-gene interaction network. Post-marketing safety assessment of constipation drugs: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS database. Assessment of adverse events of the novel antiepileptic drug lamotrigine: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS. Drug-induced skin ulcer: real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1