eFAST to OR: Determining the Quality of Paramedic Conduction and Interpretation of eFAST Exams in Prehospital Settings.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf008
Emily Roberts, Alexa Carboni, Michael Miller, Aleesa Rosas, Ryan Shelton, Jodi Peterson, Jonathan Apfelbaum, Amanda Toney, Anthony LaPorta, K Dean Gubler
{"title":"eFAST to OR: Determining the Quality of Paramedic Conduction and Interpretation of eFAST Exams in Prehospital Settings.","authors":"Emily Roberts, Alexa Carboni, Michael Miller, Aleesa Rosas, Ryan Shelton, Jodi Peterson, Jonathan Apfelbaum, Amanda Toney, Anthony LaPorta, K Dean Gubler","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among young adults. Direct transport to the operating room has been associated with reduced mortality by minimizing treatment delays. The extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST) is a critical diagnostic tool in trauma care, identifying life-threatening conditions that may require urgent surgical intervention. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of eFAST performed by paramedics in a prehospital environment, comparing their interpretations to those of expert physicians. A retrospective observational cohort analysis was conducted on trauma cases (n = 64) attended by South Metro Fire Rescue from January to December 2022. Paramedics underwent comprehensive training in ultrasound use and interpretation before performing eFAST exams in transit to medical facilities. Exam findings were compared to interpretations by an expert ultrasonographer, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values calculated. The cohort consisted primarily of males (63%), with a mean age of 46 years. The most common injury mechanism was motor vehicle crash (n = 20). Paramedic-conducted eFAST exams demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 95.8%. Positive and negative predictive values were 50% and 95.8%, respectively. False positives were largely due to difficulty in interpreting normal anatomy or identifying pathologies. Paramedics can reliably perform eFAST exams with high diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that prehospital eFAST could enhance trauma care by reducing time to surgical intervention. Future research should explore the integration of eFAST into prehospital protocols across diverse settings to improve trauma outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"135-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traumatic injuries are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly among young adults. Direct transport to the operating room has been associated with reduced mortality by minimizing treatment delays. The extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (eFAST) is a critical diagnostic tool in trauma care, identifying life-threatening conditions that may require urgent surgical intervention. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of eFAST performed by paramedics in a prehospital environment, comparing their interpretations to those of expert physicians. A retrospective observational cohort analysis was conducted on trauma cases (n = 64) attended by South Metro Fire Rescue from January to December 2022. Paramedics underwent comprehensive training in ultrasound use and interpretation before performing eFAST exams in transit to medical facilities. Exam findings were compared to interpretations by an expert ultrasonographer, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values calculated. The cohort consisted primarily of males (63%), with a mean age of 46 years. The most common injury mechanism was motor vehicle crash (n = 20). Paramedic-conducted eFAST exams demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 95.8%. Positive and negative predictive values were 50% and 95.8%, respectively. False positives were largely due to difficulty in interpreting normal anatomy or identifying pathologies. Paramedics can reliably perform eFAST exams with high diagnostic accuracy, suggesting that prehospital eFAST could enhance trauma care by reducing time to surgical intervention. Future research should explore the integration of eFAST into prehospital protocols across diverse settings to improve trauma outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速到手术室:确定院前环境中护理人员传导和快速检查解释的质量。
创伤性损伤是发病率和死亡率的主要原因,尤其是在年轻人中。直接送往手术室可以减少治疗延误,从而降低死亡率。扩展的创伤超声聚焦评估(eFAST)是创伤护理中的关键诊断工具,可识别可能需要紧急手术干预的危及生命的情况。本研究旨在评估院前环境下护理人员进行eFAST诊断的准确性,并将他们的解释与专家医生的解释进行比较。对2022年1月至12月南方地铁消防救援中心收治的创伤病例(n = 64)进行回顾性观察队列分析。护理人员在前往医疗设施进行快速超声检查之前,接受了超声波使用和解释方面的全面培训。将检查结果与超声专家的解释进行比较,计算灵敏度、特异性和预测值。该队列主要由男性(63%)组成,平均年龄为46岁。最常见的损伤机制是机动车碰撞(n = 20)。护理人员进行的eFAST检查灵敏度为80.0%,特异性为95.8%。阳性预测值为50%,阴性预测值为95.8%。假阳性主要是由于难以解释正常解剖或识别病理。护理人员可以可靠地进行eFAST检查,诊断准确性高,表明院前eFAST可以通过减少手术干预时间来加强创伤护理。未来的研究应探索将eFAST整合到不同环境的院前协议中,以改善创伤结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
Higher Fat Ration Formulations Minimize Energy Deficit During a Short Field Training Exercise. Orthopedic Surgical Case Volume is Low at Foreign Military Hospitals and Often Insufficient for Board Eligibility. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Ultrasound in Austere Trauma Environments: Implications for Role 1 Military Medicine. Expeditionary Endovascular Trauma Care as a Core Capability for Future Large-Scale Conflicts. Prevalence of Obesity Medications in the Military Health System: An Update from 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1