Ryan C Costantino, Nicole J Brandt, Eleanor M Perfetto, Jessica R Hull, C Daniel Mullins
{"title":"Identifying Concepts to Establish Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS).","authors":"Ryan C Costantino, Nicole J Brandt, Eleanor M Perfetto, Jessica R Hull, C Daniel Mullins","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The military's approach to medication use often evolves in response to operational issues that have the potential to impact the medical readiness and combat effectiveness of active duty service members (ADSMs). Historically, medications have been considered problematic because they serve as surrogate markers for deployment limiting health conditions or due to factors that make sustainment challenging in military/austere environments. This study aims to identify key concepts that capture the aspects of a medication that make it problematic in ADSMs. The goal of this effort would be to inform a future policy and establish criteria for Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS) to enhance the readiness and deployability of ADSMs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Concepts of ProMADS were elicited from 8 key informants (KIs). Key informants included care providers and care recipients from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Health Agency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a phenomenological approach was used to summarize KI perspectives, and thematic analysis identified core elements and sub-elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five core elements were identified: (1) Adverse cognitive or behavioral effects, (2) sustainment issues, (3) controlled substance compliance and risk mitigation, (4) medication-related hemostasis interference, and (5) combat-readiness inhibitors. Key sub-concepts were related to whether a medication might impact cognition, cause sedation, have complex monitoring requirements (e.g., laboratory, adverse drug reactions, etc.), is temperature sensitive, or impacts the functioning of the immune system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study generated core medication-related concepts and sub-concepts that KIs believe make a medication innately problematic among ADSMs. These findings can guide consensus-driven efforts to identify ProMADS which would enable Military Departments and Combat Support Agencies to create programs that improve lethality, warfighting, and readiness by optimizing medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The military's approach to medication use often evolves in response to operational issues that have the potential to impact the medical readiness and combat effectiveness of active duty service members (ADSMs). Historically, medications have been considered problematic because they serve as surrogate markers for deployment limiting health conditions or due to factors that make sustainment challenging in military/austere environments. This study aims to identify key concepts that capture the aspects of a medication that make it problematic in ADSMs. The goal of this effort would be to inform a future policy and establish criteria for Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS) to enhance the readiness and deployability of ADSMs.
Materials and methods: Concepts of ProMADS were elicited from 8 key informants (KIs). Key informants included care providers and care recipients from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Health Agency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a phenomenological approach was used to summarize KI perspectives, and thematic analysis identified core elements and sub-elements.
Results: Five core elements were identified: (1) Adverse cognitive or behavioral effects, (2) sustainment issues, (3) controlled substance compliance and risk mitigation, (4) medication-related hemostasis interference, and (5) combat-readiness inhibitors. Key sub-concepts were related to whether a medication might impact cognition, cause sedation, have complex monitoring requirements (e.g., laboratory, adverse drug reactions, etc.), is temperature sensitive, or impacts the functioning of the immune system.
Conclusion: This study generated core medication-related concepts and sub-concepts that KIs believe make a medication innately problematic among ADSMs. These findings can guide consensus-driven efforts to identify ProMADS which would enable Military Departments and Combat Support Agencies to create programs that improve lethality, warfighting, and readiness by optimizing medication use.
期刊介绍:
Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor.
The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.