Identifying Concepts to Establish Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS).

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Military Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1093/milmed/usaf037
Ryan C Costantino, Nicole J Brandt, Eleanor M Perfetto, Jessica R Hull, C Daniel Mullins
{"title":"Identifying Concepts to Establish Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS).","authors":"Ryan C Costantino, Nicole J Brandt, Eleanor M Perfetto, Jessica R Hull, C Daniel Mullins","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The military's approach to medication use often evolves in response to operational issues that have the potential to impact the medical readiness and combat effectiveness of active duty service members (ADSMs). Historically, medications have been considered problematic because they serve as surrogate markers for deployment limiting health conditions or due to factors that make sustainment challenging in military/austere environments. This study aims to identify key concepts that capture the aspects of a medication that make it problematic in ADSMs. The goal of this effort would be to inform a future policy and establish criteria for Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS) to enhance the readiness and deployability of ADSMs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Concepts of ProMADS were elicited from 8 key informants (KIs). Key informants included care providers and care recipients from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Health Agency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a phenomenological approach was used to summarize KI perspectives, and thematic analysis identified core elements and sub-elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five core elements were identified: (1) Adverse cognitive or behavioral effects, (2) sustainment issues, (3) controlled substance compliance and risk mitigation, (4) medication-related hemostasis interference, and (5) combat-readiness inhibitors. Key sub-concepts were related to whether a medication might impact cognition, cause sedation, have complex monitoring requirements (e.g., laboratory, adverse drug reactions, etc.), is temperature sensitive, or impacts the functioning of the immune system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study generated core medication-related concepts and sub-concepts that KIs believe make a medication innately problematic among ADSMs. These findings can guide consensus-driven efforts to identify ProMADS which would enable Military Departments and Combat Support Agencies to create programs that improve lethality, warfighting, and readiness by optimizing medication use.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The military's approach to medication use often evolves in response to operational issues that have the potential to impact the medical readiness and combat effectiveness of active duty service members (ADSMs). Historically, medications have been considered problematic because they serve as surrogate markers for deployment limiting health conditions or due to factors that make sustainment challenging in military/austere environments. This study aims to identify key concepts that capture the aspects of a medication that make it problematic in ADSMs. The goal of this effort would be to inform a future policy and establish criteria for Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS) to enhance the readiness and deployability of ADSMs.

Materials and methods: Concepts of ProMADS were elicited from 8 key informants (KIs). Key informants included care providers and care recipients from the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Defense Health Agency. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a phenomenological approach was used to summarize KI perspectives, and thematic analysis identified core elements and sub-elements.

Results: Five core elements were identified: (1) Adverse cognitive or behavioral effects, (2) sustainment issues, (3) controlled substance compliance and risk mitigation, (4) medication-related hemostasis interference, and (5) combat-readiness inhibitors. Key sub-concepts were related to whether a medication might impact cognition, cause sedation, have complex monitoring requirements (e.g., laboratory, adverse drug reactions, etc.), is temperature sensitive, or impacts the functioning of the immune system.

Conclusion: This study generated core medication-related concepts and sub-concepts that KIs believe make a medication innately problematic among ADSMs. These findings can guide consensus-driven efforts to identify ProMADS which would enable Military Departments and Combat Support Agencies to create programs that improve lethality, warfighting, and readiness by optimizing medication use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:军队的用药方法经常会因作战问题而发生变化,这些问题可能会影响现役军人(ADSM)的医疗准备和战斗力。从历史上看,药物一直被认为是有问题的,因为它们是限制部署的健康状况的代用标记,或者是由于在军事/艰苦环境中持续用药具有挑战性的因素。本研究旨在确定一些关键概念,以捕捉使药物在 ADSMs 中成为问题药物的各个方面。这项工作的目标是为未来的政策提供依据,并建立现役军人问题药物(ProMADS)标准,以提高现役军人的战备状态和部署能力:从 8 位关键信息提供者 (KIs) 处获得了 ProMADS 的概念。关键信息提供者包括来自陆军、海军、空军和国防卫生局的护理提供者和护理对象。研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,并采用现象学方法总结了关键信息提供者的观点,通过主题分析确定了核心要素和子要素:结果:确定了五个核心要素:(1) 认知或行为方面的不良影响,(2) 持续性问题,(3) 受控物质合规性和风险缓解,(4) 与药物相关的止血干扰,以及 (5) 战斗准备抑制因素。关键的子概念涉及药物是否会影响认知、引起镇静、有复杂的监测要求(如实验室、药物不良反应等)、对温度敏感或影响免疫系统功能:本研究得出了与药物相关的核心概念和次级概念,这些概念是 KIs 认为在 ADSM 中使某种药物天生就有问题的因素。这些发现可以指导以共识为导向的努力,以确定 ProMADS,从而使军事部门和战斗支援机构能够制定计划,通过优化药物使用来提高杀伤力、战斗力和战备状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
期刊最新文献
eFAST to OR: Determining the Quality of Paramedic Conduction and Interpretation of eFAST Exams in Prehospital Settings. Evaluating Nanopore Sequencing as a Respiratory Virus Diagnostic Tool for the Prehospital Setting. Identifying Concepts to Establish Problematic Medications in Active Duty Servicemembers (ProMADS). Musculoskeletal Care Within the Holistic Health and Fitness Team: A 12-month Retrospective Review. Use, Benefits, and Barriers to Financial and Credit Counseling Among Veterans According to Financial Counselors and Other Subject Matter Experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1