Experimentally induced pain and paresthesia respond differently to parameter changes of cuff-based compression in pain-free young individuals.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105339
Jacek Skalski, Sylwia Swoboda, Tibor M Szikszay, Piotr Wodarski, Andrzej Bieniek, Kerstin Luedtke, Wacław M Adamczyk
{"title":"Experimentally induced pain and paresthesia respond differently to parameter changes of cuff-based compression in pain-free young individuals.","authors":"Jacek Skalski, Sylwia Swoboda, Tibor M Szikszay, Piotr Wodarski, Andrzej Bieniek, Kerstin Luedtke, Wacław M Adamczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuropathic pain is a significant therapeutic challenge due to the co-occurrence with other neurological symptoms such as paresthesia. Human-based models such as cuff algometry can enhance our understanding of pain-paresthesia relationships. This experiment aimed to characterize (psychophysically) pain and paresthesia evoked by stimuli of different temporal and intensity parameters and to demonstrate the reliability of experimental induction of these two symptoms using cuff algometry. Forty participants, aged 18-35, were exposed to mechanical pressure stimuli at three intensities (100, 150, 200 mmHg) and three durations (90, 120, 150s). Skin Conductance (SC) was continuously monitored, and participants rated pain and paresthesia in real-time using a computerized visual analog scale. The General Linear Model analysis revealed significant differences in paresthesia across all durations (p<0.01), but not all intensities, as paresthesia did not increase from 150 to 200 mmHg (p>0.05). Conversely, pain responses showed significant differences across all pressure intensities (p<0.05) but not durations, as pain did not increase from 90 to 120 and from 120 to 150s (p>0.05). No interaction effects were found for either symptom. SC analysis showed no significant main or interaction effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated moderate to excellent reliability for pain and paresthesia induction across different durations and intensities (ICC: 0.51-0.91), while SC showed poor to good reliability (ICC: 0.17-0.79). In conclusion, computerized cuff algometry seems to be an effective and reliable method for simultaneously inducing and assessing pain and paresthesia, revealing that these symptoms follow different patterns based on pressure duration and intensity. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates that pain and paresthesia respond differently to varying intensities and durations of mechanical pressure, revealing their distinct psychophysical characteristics. This model can advance the understanding of neuropathic conditions and aid the development of more targeted therapeutic approaches for both pain and paresthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":"105339"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuropathic pain is a significant therapeutic challenge due to the co-occurrence with other neurological symptoms such as paresthesia. Human-based models such as cuff algometry can enhance our understanding of pain-paresthesia relationships. This experiment aimed to characterize (psychophysically) pain and paresthesia evoked by stimuli of different temporal and intensity parameters and to demonstrate the reliability of experimental induction of these two symptoms using cuff algometry. Forty participants, aged 18-35, were exposed to mechanical pressure stimuli at three intensities (100, 150, 200 mmHg) and three durations (90, 120, 150s). Skin Conductance (SC) was continuously monitored, and participants rated pain and paresthesia in real-time using a computerized visual analog scale. The General Linear Model analysis revealed significant differences in paresthesia across all durations (p<0.01), but not all intensities, as paresthesia did not increase from 150 to 200 mmHg (p>0.05). Conversely, pain responses showed significant differences across all pressure intensities (p<0.05) but not durations, as pain did not increase from 90 to 120 and from 120 to 150s (p>0.05). No interaction effects were found for either symptom. SC analysis showed no significant main or interaction effects. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated moderate to excellent reliability for pain and paresthesia induction across different durations and intensities (ICC: 0.51-0.91), while SC showed poor to good reliability (ICC: 0.17-0.79). In conclusion, computerized cuff algometry seems to be an effective and reliable method for simultaneously inducing and assessing pain and paresthesia, revealing that these symptoms follow different patterns based on pressure duration and intensity. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates that pain and paresthesia respond differently to varying intensities and durations of mechanical pressure, revealing their distinct psychophysical characteristics. This model can advance the understanding of neuropathic conditions and aid the development of more targeted therapeutic approaches for both pain and paresthesia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Hyperbaric oxygen attenuates chronic postsurgical pain by regulating the CD73/adenosine/A1R axis of the spinal cord in rats” [J Pain 25, 2024, 104623] Chronic musculoskeletal pain and its association with cognitive function and sarcopenia in older adults: Characterization and change over three months Effects of manual therapy combined with therapeutic exercise on brain structure in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain: A randomized controlled trial Associations of Ethnic Identity, Religiosity, Discrimination, and Injustice Appraisal with Pain-Related Outcomes in Arab Americans with Chronic Back Pain. Transgenic mice with a global depletion of toll-like receptor type 4 are largely protected from peripheral and central posttraumatic neuroinflammation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1