Self-rated pain and observed pain behavior in Black and White Americans with chronic low back pain

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105338
Matthew B. Jennings , John W. Burns , Benita Jackson , Kristine M. Molina , Mark A. Lumley
{"title":"Self-rated pain and observed pain behavior in Black and White Americans with chronic low back pain","authors":"Matthew B. Jennings ,&nbsp;John W. Burns ,&nbsp;Benita Jackson ,&nbsp;Kristine M. Molina ,&nbsp;Mark A. Lumley","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Black Americans report more intense and disabling pain than White Americans, but differences in pain behavior have rarely been studied. The Structured Pain Behavior Test (SPBT), a standardized, video-recorded series of pain-inducing movements, assesses the behavioral expression of pain. We conducted the first test of whether Black Americans with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have greater pain behavior and increased self-reported pain intensity during the SPBT, compared to White Americans. Adults (<em>N</em> = 267) with CLBP (174 Black, 93 White; 57% female) rated their clinical pain severity and interference (Multidimensional Pain Inventory; MPI) and their current pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; NRS) both before and after engaging in the SPBT, which was coded for observed pain behavior. Consistent with prior research, Black participants reported greater MPI clinical pain severity and interference (large effect). More importantly, during the SPBT, Black participants had greater pain behavior (medium effect) and reported a greater increase in pain intensity (NRS; small-medium effect) than did Whites. Racialized differences in all pain measures remained significant after controlling for multiple variables (including depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing), and differences in observed pain behavior remained after also controlling for self-reported pain intensity (NRS) or MPI clinical pain severity. We conclude that greater self-reported pain severity and interference among Black Americans is accompanied by greater pain behavior and increased pain intensity in response to pain-inducing movements. Research should examine possible mechanisms of this racialized difference, including differential access and care, racism as pain exacerbator, and the social communication of pain.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Black Americans with chronic back pain have greater self-reported pain severity than White Americans and greater pain behavior during the Structured Pain Behavior Test, even after controlling for self-reported pain and other variables. Black Americans’ elevated pain may reflect poorer health care, racism-induced pain exacerbation, and/or social communication of need.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 105338"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025005656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Black Americans report more intense and disabling pain than White Americans, but differences in pain behavior have rarely been studied. The Structured Pain Behavior Test (SPBT), a standardized, video-recorded series of pain-inducing movements, assesses the behavioral expression of pain. We conducted the first test of whether Black Americans with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have greater pain behavior and increased self-reported pain intensity during the SPBT, compared to White Americans. Adults (N = 267) with CLBP (174 Black, 93 White; 57% female) rated their clinical pain severity and interference (Multidimensional Pain Inventory; MPI) and their current pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; NRS) both before and after engaging in the SPBT, which was coded for observed pain behavior. Consistent with prior research, Black participants reported greater MPI clinical pain severity and interference (large effect). More importantly, during the SPBT, Black participants had greater pain behavior (medium effect) and reported a greater increase in pain intensity (NRS; small-medium effect) than did Whites. Racialized differences in all pain measures remained significant after controlling for multiple variables (including depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing), and differences in observed pain behavior remained after also controlling for self-reported pain intensity (NRS) or MPI clinical pain severity. We conclude that greater self-reported pain severity and interference among Black Americans is accompanied by greater pain behavior and increased pain intensity in response to pain-inducing movements. Research should examine possible mechanisms of this racialized difference, including differential access and care, racism as pain exacerbator, and the social communication of pain.

Perspective

Black Americans with chronic back pain have greater self-reported pain severity than White Americans and greater pain behavior during the Structured Pain Behavior Test, even after controlling for self-reported pain and other variables. Black Americans’ elevated pain may reflect poorer health care, racism-induced pain exacerbation, and/or social communication of need.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国黑人和白人慢性腰痛患者的自评疼痛和观察疼痛行为。
与白人相比,美国黑人报告的疼痛更强烈,更令人致残,但很少有人研究疼痛行为的差异。结构化疼痛行为测试(SPBT)是一种标准化的、录像的一系列引起疼痛的动作,评估疼痛的行为表达。与美国白人相比,患有慢性腰痛(CLBP)的美国黑人在SPBT中是否有更大的疼痛行为和更高的自我报告疼痛强度,我们进行了第一次测试。成人CLBP患者267例(黑人174例,白人93例;57%的女性)评定他们的临床疼痛严重程度和干扰(多维疼痛量表;MPI)和他们当前的疼痛强度(数值评定量表;在参与SPBT之前和之后,对观察到的疼痛行为进行编码。与先前的研究一致,黑人参与者报告了更大的MPI临床疼痛严重程度和干扰(大效应)。更重要的是,在SPBT期间,黑人参与者有更大的疼痛行为(中等效应),并报告了更大的疼痛强度增加(NRS;中小型效应)比白人高。在控制了多个变量(包括抑郁症状和疼痛灾难化)后,所有疼痛测量的种族化差异仍然显著,在控制了自我报告的疼痛强度(NRS)或MPI临床疼痛严重程度后,观察到的疼痛行为的差异仍然存在。我们的结论是,在美国黑人中,自我报告的疼痛严重程度和干预程度更高,伴随着更大的疼痛行为,以及对疼痛诱发运动的疼痛强度增加。研究应该检查这种种族化差异的可能机制,包括不同的获取和护理,种族主义作为疼痛加剧因素,以及疼痛的社会沟通。观点:在结构化疼痛行为测试中,患有慢性背痛的美国黑人自我报告的疼痛严重程度高于美国白人,疼痛行为也高于白人,即使在控制了自我报告的疼痛和其他变量之后也是如此。美国黑人疼痛加剧可能反映了较差的医疗保健、种族主义引起的疼痛加剧和/或社会沟通需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions for managing sickle cell crisis pain: A qualitative study on adolescents’ and caregivers’ experiences Thalamocortical and corticostriatal pathways in the progression from acute to chronic musculoskeletal pain: An fMRI study Reliability and stability of pain ratings and secondary hyperalgesia to experimental phasic heat pain across multiple days and weeks Development of a Central Sensitization Inventory short form using data from twenty-three countries Cross-sectional and within-person associations of chronic overlapping pain conditions and psychosocial functioning in young adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1