Using intensive longitudinal assessment to study mechanisms of the Native American pain inequity among persons experiencing depression and/or anxiety: The role of interpersonal discrimination and stress

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105329
Jamie L. Rhudy PhD , Joanna O. Shadlow PhD , Travis S. Lowe PhD , Lancer D. Stephens PhD , Michael J. Zvolensky PhD , Lorra Garey PhD , Darla E. Kendzor , Michael S. Businelle PhD
{"title":"Using intensive longitudinal assessment to study mechanisms of the Native American pain inequity among persons experiencing depression and/or anxiety: The role of interpersonal discrimination and stress","authors":"Jamie L. Rhudy PhD ,&nbsp;Joanna O. Shadlow PhD ,&nbsp;Travis S. Lowe PhD ,&nbsp;Lancer D. Stephens PhD ,&nbsp;Michael J. Zvolensky PhD ,&nbsp;Lorra Garey PhD ,&nbsp;Darla E. Kendzor ,&nbsp;Michael S. Businelle PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Native Americans (NA) experience higher rates of chronic pain than other U.S. racial/ethnic groups. Our research has indicated discrimination and stress play a role in chronic pain onset. However, chronic pain research has mostly relied on retrospective reports that may be impacted by recall bias. The current study was a secondary analysis of data from 208 NA, 206 Black, 202 Latinx, and 206 non-Hispanic White (NHW) participants from an efficacy trial of a mobile health intervention for depression and anxiety. Participants were prompted to complete 6 months of twice daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) that included stress and pain. Discrimination was assessed at baseline. Pain EMAs were used to reduce recall bias and estimate chronic pain prevalence. Dynamic structural equation modeling assessed the impact of race/ethnicity and discrimination on stress-pain relationships, as well as pain and stress dynamics. To assess chronic pain (pain ≥3-months), participants had to complete ≥3-months of consecutive EMAs, leaving 578 participants available for primary analyses (there were no racial/ethnic differences in EMA completion). Results showed NAs had the highest rate of chronic pain that was statistically significantly higher than NHW and Black participants. Controlling discrimination eliminated the NA-NHW, but not the NA-Black, pain inequity. Moreover, a reciprocal stress-pain relationship was found and was stronger in NAs than other groups. Discrimination did not exacerbate stress-pain relationships but was associated with higher rates of chronic pain and greater pain fluctuations, regardless of race/ethnicity. These findings indicate that targeting stress and discrimination could help reduce the NA pain inequity.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Native Americans experienced a self-reinforcing stress-pain cycle in which stress predicted future pain and pain predicted future stress. This cycle was stronger than Black, Latinx, and non-Hispanic White groups. Discrimination was associated with chronic pain but not stronger stress-pain relationships. These findings have implications for treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 105329"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526590025005565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Native Americans (NA) experience higher rates of chronic pain than other U.S. racial/ethnic groups. Our research has indicated discrimination and stress play a role in chronic pain onset. However, chronic pain research has mostly relied on retrospective reports that may be impacted by recall bias. The current study was a secondary analysis of data from 208 NA, 206 Black, 202 Latinx, and 206 non-Hispanic White (NHW) participants from an efficacy trial of a mobile health intervention for depression and anxiety. Participants were prompted to complete 6 months of twice daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) that included stress and pain. Discrimination was assessed at baseline. Pain EMAs were used to reduce recall bias and estimate chronic pain prevalence. Dynamic structural equation modeling assessed the impact of race/ethnicity and discrimination on stress-pain relationships, as well as pain and stress dynamics. To assess chronic pain (pain ≥3-months), participants had to complete ≥3-months of consecutive EMAs, leaving 578 participants available for primary analyses (there were no racial/ethnic differences in EMA completion). Results showed NAs had the highest rate of chronic pain that was statistically significantly higher than NHW and Black participants. Controlling discrimination eliminated the NA-NHW, but not the NA-Black, pain inequity. Moreover, a reciprocal stress-pain relationship was found and was stronger in NAs than other groups. Discrimination did not exacerbate stress-pain relationships but was associated with higher rates of chronic pain and greater pain fluctuations, regardless of race/ethnicity. These findings indicate that targeting stress and discrimination could help reduce the NA pain inequity.

Perspective

Native Americans experienced a self-reinforcing stress-pain cycle in which stress predicted future pain and pain predicted future stress. This cycle was stronger than Black, Latinx, and non-Hispanic White groups. Discrimination was associated with chronic pain but not stronger stress-pain relationships. These findings have implications for treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用密集的纵向评估研究美国原住民在抑郁和/或焦虑人群中的疼痛不平等机制:人际歧视和压力的作用。
美国原住民(NA)的慢性疼痛率高于美国其他种族/族裔群体。我们的研究表明,歧视和压力在慢性疼痛发作中起作用。然而,慢性疼痛研究大多依赖于可能受到回忆偏差影响的回顾性报告。目前的研究是对208名北美裔、206名黑人、202名拉丁裔和206名非西班牙裔白人(NHW)参与者的数据进行二次分析,这些参与者来自一项针对抑郁和焦虑的移动健康干预的疗效试验。参与者被提示完成为期6个月的每日两次生态瞬时评估(ema),包括压力和疼痛。歧视在基线时进行评估。疼痛EMAs被用来减少回忆偏差和估计慢性疼痛的患病率。动态结构方程模型评估了种族/民族和歧视对压力-疼痛关系以及疼痛和压力动态的影响。为了评估慢性疼痛(疼痛≥3个月),参与者必须完成≥3个月的连续EMA,留下578名参与者进行初步分析(EMA完成情况没有种族/民族差异)。结果显示,NAs的慢性疼痛率最高,统计学上显著高于NHW和黑人参与者。控制歧视消除了NA-NHW,但没有消除NA-Black的痛苦不平等。此外,在NAs组中发现了相互的应激-疼痛关系,并且比其他组更强。歧视不会加剧压力-疼痛关系,但与更高的慢性疼痛率和更大的疼痛波动有关,与种族/民族无关。这些发现表明,针对压力和歧视可以帮助减少NA疼痛不平等。观点(最多50个单词):印第安人经历了一个自我强化的压力-疼痛循环,在这个循环中,压力预示着未来的痛苦,痛苦预示着未来的压力。这种循环比黑人、拉丁裔和非西班牙裔白人群体更为强烈。歧视与慢性疼痛有关,但与更强的压力-疼痛关系无关。这些发现对治疗具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain
Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
441
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. Articles selected for publication in the Journal are most commonly reports of original clinical research or reports of original basic research. In addition, invited critical reviews, including meta analyses of drugs for pain management, invited commentaries on reviews, and exceptional case studies are published in the Journal. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals to publish original research.
期刊最新文献
Reliability and stability of pain ratings and secondary hyperalgesia to experimental phasic heat pain across multiple days and weeks Development of a Central Sensitization Inventory short form using data from twenty-three countries Cross-sectional and within-person associations of chronic overlapping pain conditions and psychosocial functioning in young adults “Dancing in Pain is a Symbol of Determination” – Understanding dance related pain in relation to dancer identity using the biopsychosocial model of health What we read matters: Exploring emotional and cognitive responses of pain science education and biomedical education in older adults with knee osteoarthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1