Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue in Thailand: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01522-6
Julia Crowley, Bowen Liu, Hanan Jan
{"title":"Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue in Thailand: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Julia Crowley, Bowen Liu, Hanan Jan","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01522-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dengue cases are on the rise in Thailand, coinciding with increases in flooding events. Studies pertaining to public knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue prevention have frequently been used to better understand the public's needs towards dengue. While these studies were conducted in different settings, it is necessary to initiate a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Subjects and method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies in Thailand that assessed the KAP towards dengue. Eligibility criteria were established and independently used by reviewers to select nine studies for the systematic review and three for the meta-analysis. Collectively, the nine studies included 3,058 individuals and 2,519 households.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall estimate of the proportion of participants with good knowledge of dengue prevention is 35% (95% CI: 14-59%), suggesting the majority of the population in Thailand had low levels of knowledge towards dengue. The poor levels of practice in Thailand were also observed and confirmed for the majority of the population by meta-analysis, with the pooled estimate of the proportion of participants with good practice of dengue prevention being 25% (95% CI: 22-27%). In contrast, most of the studies included in the systematic review reported positive attitudes towards dengue prevention, and this finding was also affirmed by the meta-analysis, as the pooled estimate of the proportion of positive attitudes towards dengue prevention is 61% (95% CI: 43-77%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite good attitudes towards dengue prevention, poor knowledge and poor practices predominate, highlighting the need for enhanced public health campaigns to educate the public on dengue risks and prevention methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01522-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Dengue cases are on the rise in Thailand, coinciding with increases in flooding events. Studies pertaining to public knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue prevention have frequently been used to better understand the public's needs towards dengue. While these studies were conducted in different settings, it is necessary to initiate a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies.

Subjects and method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies in Thailand that assessed the KAP towards dengue. Eligibility criteria were established and independently used by reviewers to select nine studies for the systematic review and three for the meta-analysis. Collectively, the nine studies included 3,058 individuals and 2,519 households.

Results: The overall estimate of the proportion of participants with good knowledge of dengue prevention is 35% (95% CI: 14-59%), suggesting the majority of the population in Thailand had low levels of knowledge towards dengue. The poor levels of practice in Thailand were also observed and confirmed for the majority of the population by meta-analysis, with the pooled estimate of the proportion of participants with good practice of dengue prevention being 25% (95% CI: 22-27%). In contrast, most of the studies included in the systematic review reported positive attitudes towards dengue prevention, and this finding was also affirmed by the meta-analysis, as the pooled estimate of the proportion of positive attitudes towards dengue prevention is 61% (95% CI: 43-77%).

Conclusion: Despite good attitudes towards dengue prevention, poor knowledge and poor practices predominate, highlighting the need for enhanced public health campaigns to educate the public on dengue risks and prevention methods.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估泰国登革热的知识、态度和实践(KAP):一项系统综述和荟萃分析
目的:泰国的登革热病例呈上升趋势,与此同时,洪水事件也在增加。关于登革热预防的公众知识、态度和实践(KAP)的研究经常被用来更好地了解公众对登革热的需求。虽然这些研究是在不同的环境下进行的,但有必要对相关研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。研究对象和方法:我们对泰国评估登革热KAP的先前研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。建立资格标准,并由审稿人独立使用,选择9项研究进行系统评价,3项研究进行荟萃分析。这9项研究总共包括3058名个人和2519个家庭。结果:总体估计,对登革热预防有良好知识的参与者比例为35% (95% CI: 14-59%),这表明泰国大多数人口对登革热的知识水平较低。通过荟萃分析,还观察到泰国大多数人群的不良实践水平,并证实了这一点,对具有良好登革热预防实践的参与者比例的汇总估计为25% (95% CI: 22-27%)。相比之下,系统综述中纳入的大多数研究报告了对登革热预防的积极态度,这一发现也得到了荟萃分析的肯定,因为对登革热预防的积极态度比例的汇总估计为61% (95% CI: 43-77%)。结论:尽管对登革热预防的态度良好,但知识和做法不佳的情况占主导地位,突出表明需要加强公共卫生运动,向公众宣传登革热的风险和预防方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cervico-vaginal high-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in India prior to nationwide human papillomavirus vaccination. Methodological heterogeneity and equity challenges of distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare: a systematic review from 2017 to 2025. Reasons for HIV testing in women diagnosed with HIV (2000-2023): insights from a 24-year retrospective cohort study in Barcelona, Spain. Non-pharmacological interventions for improving sleep quality in adults aged 50 years and older: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1