Translating and communicating evidence on allergy prevention in children to parents: implementation study protocol.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01534-2
Jonas Lander, Hala Altawil, Christian Apfelbacher, Eva Maria Bitzer, Susanne Brandstetter, Barbara Fillenberg, Marius Hartmann, Christine Holmberg, Julia von Sommoggy, Marie-Luise Dierks
{"title":"Translating and communicating evidence on allergy prevention in children to parents: implementation study protocol.","authors":"Jonas Lander, Hala Altawil, Christian Apfelbacher, Eva Maria Bitzer, Susanne Brandstetter, Barbara Fillenberg, Marius Hartmann, Christine Holmberg, Julia von Sommoggy, Marie-Luise Dierks","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01534-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When seeking advice on allergy prevention in early childhood (Early Childhood Allergy Prevention, ECAP), parents often turn to health and social care providers, such as paediatricians, midwives, and family centres. However, these actors fulfil various, often care-related, roles, and cannot be considered 'health information providers' by default. In addition, although the scientific evidence for ECAP is often known by health professionals, it is not actively communicated. In this study protocol, we describe the planned procedure for the development and implementation of a process to communicate ECAP information to parents, with a focus on reaching out to those from migrant communities. Thereby, we also aim to contribute to the understanding of how to design more robust approaches to deliver health information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have chosen the Implementation Research Logic Model as our framework for a multi-stage process. Firstly, we will map regional and local health and social care providers to find potential providers of ECAP information. We will then approach actors from each mapping category for qualitative interviews to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation. Next, we will define actions to ease the implementation process, develop exemplary ECAP information materials for parents, and deliver these to pre-selected health and social care individuals and organizations. Each step will be adapted to meet the needs and preferences of culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Finally, the process will be evaluated for key implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness) by interviewing information providers and surveying information recipients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>From a Public Health perspective, studies seem warranted that investigate how evidence from health research may be effectively communicated to the public, rather than merely focusing on, e.g., intervention development. Also, it has often been highlighted that the dissemination of health information needs to better target those who face the greatest difficulties when seeking advice, i.e. individuals/parents who recently migrated. ECAP is a good use case, as scientific evidence is constantly evolving, and the communication of information is hampered by low awareness of high quality sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01534-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When seeking advice on allergy prevention in early childhood (Early Childhood Allergy Prevention, ECAP), parents often turn to health and social care providers, such as paediatricians, midwives, and family centres. However, these actors fulfil various, often care-related, roles, and cannot be considered 'health information providers' by default. In addition, although the scientific evidence for ECAP is often known by health professionals, it is not actively communicated. In this study protocol, we describe the planned procedure for the development and implementation of a process to communicate ECAP information to parents, with a focus on reaching out to those from migrant communities. Thereby, we also aim to contribute to the understanding of how to design more robust approaches to deliver health information.

Methods: We have chosen the Implementation Research Logic Model as our framework for a multi-stage process. Firstly, we will map regional and local health and social care providers to find potential providers of ECAP information. We will then approach actors from each mapping category for qualitative interviews to assess facilitators and barriers to implementation. Next, we will define actions to ease the implementation process, develop exemplary ECAP information materials for parents, and deliver these to pre-selected health and social care individuals and organizations. Each step will be adapted to meet the needs and preferences of culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Finally, the process will be evaluated for key implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, feasibility, effectiveness) by interviewing information providers and surveying information recipients.

Discussion: From a Public Health perspective, studies seem warranted that investigate how evidence from health research may be effectively communicated to the public, rather than merely focusing on, e.g., intervention development. Also, it has often been highlighted that the dissemination of health information needs to better target those who face the greatest difficulties when seeking advice, i.e. individuals/parents who recently migrated. ECAP is a good use case, as scientific evidence is constantly evolving, and the communication of information is hampered by low awareness of high quality sources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻译和传达儿童过敏预防的证据给家长:实施研究方案。
背景:当寻求关于儿童早期过敏预防的建议(早期儿童过敏预防,ECAP)时,父母通常会求助于健康和社会保健提供者,如儿科医生、助产士和家庭中心。然而,这些行为者扮演着各种各样的角色,往往与护理有关,不能被默认为“卫生信息提供者”。此外,虽然ECAP的科学证据通常为卫生专业人员所知,但并没有积极地进行沟通。在本研究方案中,我们描述了制定和实施与父母沟通ECAP信息的流程的计划程序,重点是与移民社区的父母沟通。因此,我们还旨在帮助理解如何设计更可靠的方法来提供健康信息。方法:我们选择了实施研究逻辑模型作为我们多阶段过程的框架。首先,我们将绘制区域和地方卫生和社会保健提供者的地图,以寻找ECAP信息的潜在提供者。然后,我们将接近每个映射类别的参与者进行定性访谈,以评估实施的促进因素和障碍。接下来,我们将确定行动,以简化实施过程,为家长制定示范性ECAP信息材料,并将这些材料分发给预先选定的卫生和社会保健个人和组织。每一步都将进行调整,以满足文化和语言多样化人群的需要和偏好。最后,将通过采访信息提供者和调查信息接受者来评价该过程的关键执行结果(例如,可接受性、可行性和有效性)。讨论:从公共卫生的角度来看,研究似乎有必要调查如何有效地将卫生研究的证据传达给公众,而不仅仅是关注干预措施的发展。此外,经常强调的是,健康信息的传播需要更好地针对那些在寻求咨询时面临最大困难的人,即最近移徙的个人/父母。ECAP是一个很好的用例,因为科学证据在不断发展,而对高质量来源的认识不足阻碍了信息的交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cervico-vaginal high-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in India prior to nationwide human papillomavirus vaccination. Methodological heterogeneity and equity challenges of distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in healthcare: a systematic review from 2017 to 2025. Reasons for HIV testing in women diagnosed with HIV (2000-2023): insights from a 24-year retrospective cohort study in Barcelona, Spain. Non-pharmacological interventions for improving sleep quality in adults aged 50 years and older: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1