Precision of the Integrated Cognitive Assessment for the assessment of neurocognitive performance in athletes.

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2025.2464884
Daniel J Glassbrook, Paul L Chazot, Karen Hind
{"title":"Precision of the Integrated Cognitive Assessment for the assessment of neurocognitive performance in athletes.","authors":"Daniel J Glassbrook, Paul L Chazot, Karen Hind","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2464884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the precision of the Integrated Cognitive Assessment (ICA; Cognetivity Neurosciences Ltd., Vancouver, Canada) test for the assessment of information processing ability in athletes. Thirty-one participants took part in this study. Participants were eligible if they were a current contact sport or non-contact sport athlete, aged 18-40 years, and healthy; having no underlying medical issues that affect participation in sport. Participants were excluded if they were injured, pregnant, or suffering from post-concussion syndrome. Participants performed the ICA test consecutively both before and after a normal training session to simulate resting and post-sport conditions. Precision errors, relationships (Pearson's r), and internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha) were calculated for three variables, ICA Index (overall information processing ability), ICA Speed (information processing speed) and ICA Accuracy (information processing accuracy). ICA precision errors [root mean squared-standard deviation, RMS-SD (coefficient of variation, %CV)] pre-sport were: ICA Index: 5.18 (7.14%), ICA Speed: 3.98 (4.64%), and ICA Accuracy: 3.64 (5.00%); and post-sport were ICA Index: 3.96 (4.94%), ICA Speed: 2.14 (2.32%), and ICA Accuracy 3.40 (4.25%). The ICA test demonstrates high in-vivo precision with all variables except ICA Index (7.14%) demonstrating an acceptable precision error of ≤5% %CV.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2464884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the precision of the Integrated Cognitive Assessment (ICA; Cognetivity Neurosciences Ltd., Vancouver, Canada) test for the assessment of information processing ability in athletes. Thirty-one participants took part in this study. Participants were eligible if they were a current contact sport or non-contact sport athlete, aged 18-40 years, and healthy; having no underlying medical issues that affect participation in sport. Participants were excluded if they were injured, pregnant, or suffering from post-concussion syndrome. Participants performed the ICA test consecutively both before and after a normal training session to simulate resting and post-sport conditions. Precision errors, relationships (Pearson's r), and internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha) were calculated for three variables, ICA Index (overall information processing ability), ICA Speed (information processing speed) and ICA Accuracy (information processing accuracy). ICA precision errors [root mean squared-standard deviation, RMS-SD (coefficient of variation, %CV)] pre-sport were: ICA Index: 5.18 (7.14%), ICA Speed: 3.98 (4.64%), and ICA Accuracy: 3.64 (5.00%); and post-sport were ICA Index: 3.96 (4.94%), ICA Speed: 2.14 (2.32%), and ICA Accuracy 3.40 (4.25%). The ICA test demonstrates high in-vivo precision with all variables except ICA Index (7.14%) demonstrating an acceptable precision error of ≤5% %CV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合认知评估对运动员神经认知表现评估的准确性。
本研究探讨了综合认知评估(ICA;认知神经科学有限公司,温哥华,加拿大)评估运动员信息处理能力的测试。31名参与者参加了这项研究。年龄在18-40岁、身体健康、目前从事接触性运动或非接触性运动的运动员均符合条件;没有影响参加体育运动的潜在的健康问题。如果参与者受伤、怀孕或患有脑震荡后综合症,他们将被排除在外。参与者在正常训练之前和之后连续进行ICA测试,以模拟休息和运动后的情况。计算ICA Index(整体信息处理能力)、ICA Speed(信息处理速度)和ICA Accuracy(信息处理精度)三个变量的精度误差、关系(Pearson’s r)和内部一致性(Cronbach’s Alpha)。运动前ICA精度误差[均方根标准差,RMS-SD(变异系数,%CV)]分别为:ICA Index: 5.18 (7.14%), ICA Speed: 3.98 (4.64%), ICA Accuracy: 3.64 (5.00%);运动后的ICA指数为3.96 (4.94%),ICA速度为2.14 (2.32%),ICA准确率为3.40(4.25%)。除ICA指数(7.14%)外,ICA测试具有较高的体内精度,表明可接受的精度误差≤5% CV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Neurocognitive performance in an Irish collegiate athlete sample: a comparison with normative data from the CNS vital signs test. Examination of WAIS-5 naming speed quantity within a multidisciplinary dementia clinic. The long-term memory sign: A clinical marker of functional cognitive disorders. Maximizing fidelity of neuropsychology assessments in fully remote studies. The effects of transcranial direct current Stimulation on Working memory and reading skills of adults with Dyslexia: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1