Katharine Press Callahan, Rebecca Mueller, Steven Joffe, Cara Skraban, Nancy Spinner, Karen Crew, K Taylor Wild, Justin T Clapp, Chris Feudtner
{"title":"How Neonatologists Use Genetic Information.","authors":"Katharine Press Callahan, Rebecca Mueller, Steven Joffe, Cara Skraban, Nancy Spinner, Karen Crew, K Taylor Wild, Justin T Clapp, Chris Feudtner","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Data sharing: </strong>Redacted transcripts will be available on request to the corresponding author.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To delineate specific ways in which neonatologists integrate genetic information into their clinical decision making.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We employed chart-stimulated recall, in which neonatologists described how they used genetic tests in specific patient cases, as well as semi-structured questioning about genetic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on 28 interviews with neonatologists, we document six uses of genetic information: making a diagnosis, categorizing/stereotyping as 'genetic,' informing prognosis, influencing treatment, informing goals of care, and supporting accountability. Both specific genetic diagnoses as well as a general categorization as \"genetic\" help neonatologists make sense of unusual clinical situations and calibrate their predictions about the future. Predictions, in turn, inform goals of care decisions, the timing of medical technology placement, and neonatologists' self-evaluations. Diagnoses rarely influence day-to-day treatment directly. Neonatologists assign great value to improved prognostication, but simultaneously feel a responsibility to ensure that genetic information is not applied in ways that are overly deterministic or reflect ableism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frameworks for measuring successes and failures of genetic information in the neonatal intensive care unit need to be aligned with the ways neonatologists use this information. Understanding neonatologists' use creates opportunity to maximize benefit and reduce bias in applying this complex information.</p>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"114508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Data sharing: Redacted transcripts will be available on request to the corresponding author.
Objective: To delineate specific ways in which neonatologists integrate genetic information into their clinical decision making.
Study design: We employed chart-stimulated recall, in which neonatologists described how they used genetic tests in specific patient cases, as well as semi-structured questioning about genetic information.
Results: Based on 28 interviews with neonatologists, we document six uses of genetic information: making a diagnosis, categorizing/stereotyping as 'genetic,' informing prognosis, influencing treatment, informing goals of care, and supporting accountability. Both specific genetic diagnoses as well as a general categorization as "genetic" help neonatologists make sense of unusual clinical situations and calibrate their predictions about the future. Predictions, in turn, inform goals of care decisions, the timing of medical technology placement, and neonatologists' self-evaluations. Diagnoses rarely influence day-to-day treatment directly. Neonatologists assign great value to improved prognostication, but simultaneously feel a responsibility to ensure that genetic information is not applied in ways that are overly deterministic or reflect ableism.
Conclusions: Frameworks for measuring successes and failures of genetic information in the neonatal intensive care unit need to be aligned with the ways neonatologists use this information. Understanding neonatologists' use creates opportunity to maximize benefit and reduce bias in applying this complex information.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.