Differences in walking access to healthcare facilities between formal and informal areas in 19 sub-Saharan African cities.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1038/s43856-025-00746-5
John Friesen, Stefanos Georganos, Jan Haas
{"title":"Differences in walking access to healthcare facilities between formal and informal areas in 19 sub-Saharan African cities.","authors":"John Friesen, Stefanos Georganos, Jan Haas","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00746-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spatial accessibility to healthcare is a critical factor in ensuring equitable health outcomes. While studies on a global, continental, and national level exist, our understanding of intra-urban differences, particularly between formal and informal areas within cities in sub-Saharan Africa, remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study integrates openly available datasets on land use in 19 sub-Saharan cities, healthcare facilities in the region, and street networks from OpenStreetMap. Using these datasets, we calculate service areas around hospitals, considering travel times ranging from 1 to 120 minutes with walking as the mode of travel. The resulting service areas are then merged with population data from WorldPop, allowing us to assess the proportion of the population with specific travel times to healthcare facilities from informal and formal residential areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis reveals that 33% of the urban population can reach hospitals within 15 minutes, 58% within 30 minutes, and 78% within 60 minutes. Importantly, for some cities, we observe significant differences between formal and informal areas, with informal areas experiencing a disadvantage in terms of spatial accessibility to healthcare facilities. The population in informal areas is particularly disadvantaged in medium-sized cities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study sheds light on the spatial accessibility of healthcare facilities in sub-Saharan African cities, emphasizing the need to consider intra-urban disparities, particularly in informal areas. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions and urban planning strategies to address these disparities and ensure that healthcare services are accessible to all segments of the urban population.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00746-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spatial accessibility to healthcare is a critical factor in ensuring equitable health outcomes. While studies on a global, continental, and national level exist, our understanding of intra-urban differences, particularly between formal and informal areas within cities in sub-Saharan Africa, remains limited.

Methods: This study integrates openly available datasets on land use in 19 sub-Saharan cities, healthcare facilities in the region, and street networks from OpenStreetMap. Using these datasets, we calculate service areas around hospitals, considering travel times ranging from 1 to 120 minutes with walking as the mode of travel. The resulting service areas are then merged with population data from WorldPop, allowing us to assess the proportion of the population with specific travel times to healthcare facilities from informal and formal residential areas.

Results: Our analysis reveals that 33% of the urban population can reach hospitals within 15 minutes, 58% within 30 minutes, and 78% within 60 minutes. Importantly, for some cities, we observe significant differences between formal and informal areas, with informal areas experiencing a disadvantage in terms of spatial accessibility to healthcare facilities. The population in informal areas is particularly disadvantaged in medium-sized cities.

Conclusions: This study sheds light on the spatial accessibility of healthcare facilities in sub-Saharan African cities, emphasizing the need to consider intra-urban disparities, particularly in informal areas. The findings underscore the importance of targeted interventions and urban planning strategies to address these disparities and ensure that healthcare services are accessible to all segments of the urban population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19个撒哈拉以南非洲城市正规地区和非正规地区步行前往医疗设施的差异。
背景:医疗保健的空间可达性是确保公平健康结果的关键因素。虽然存在全球、大陆和国家层面的研究,但我们对城市内部差异,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲城市内正式和非正式区域之间差异的理解仍然有限。方法:本研究整合了来自OpenStreetMap的19个撒哈拉以南城市、该地区卫生保健设施和街道网络的公开可用数据集。使用这些数据集,我们计算了医院周围的服务区域,考虑以步行为旅行方式的旅行时间从1到120分钟不等。然后将得到的服务区域与来自WorldPop的人口数据合并,使我们能够评估从非正式和正式居民区到医疗机构的特定旅行时间的人口比例。结果:我们的分析显示,33%的城市人口可以在15分钟内到达医院,58%的人可以在30分钟内到达医院,78%的人可以在60分钟内到达医院。重要的是,在一些城市,我们观察到正规地区和非正规地区之间存在显著差异,非正规地区在医疗设施的空间可达性方面处于劣势。中等城市非正规地区的人口处于特别不利的地位。结论:本研究揭示了撒哈拉以南非洲城市医疗设施的空间可达性,强调需要考虑城市内部的差异,特别是在非正规地区。调查结果强调了有针对性的干预措施和城市规划战略的重要性,以解决这些差距,并确保所有城市人口都能获得保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the mechanism of action of abemaciclib in breast cancer through circulating chromatin fragments. Detecting chromatin state alterations in PBMCs associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Breast cancer awareness and preferences for screening messaging on menstrual hygiene products in Ghana and Tanzania. Sleep and temperature data from wearable devices support noninvasive detection of diabetes mellitus in a large-scale, retrospective analysis. Thymopentin enhances adenoviral oncolytic therapy by regulating macrophages and CD8+ T cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1