Diagnostic accuracy of Bladder EpiCheck for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

S Artero Fullana, J Caño Velasco, A Lafuente Puentedura, L Polanco Pujol, V Bataller Monfort, M Moralejo Gárate, J D Subiela, A Gallioli, M Moschini, R Pichler, F Del Giudice, G Marcq, J Teoh, F Soria, L Mertens, W Krajewski, E Laukhtina, K Mori, B Pradere, L Afferi, K H Tully, S Albisinni, Y Abu Ghanem, D d'Andrea, A Mari, E Albers Acosta, R Contieri, A Cimadamore, E Grobet-Jeandin, J Gómez Rivas, C Hernández Fernández
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Bladder EpiCheck for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.","authors":"S Artero Fullana, J Caño Velasco, A Lafuente Puentedura, L Polanco Pujol, V Bataller Monfort, M Moralejo Gárate, J D Subiela, A Gallioli, M Moschini, R Pichler, F Del Giudice, G Marcq, J Teoh, F Soria, L Mertens, W Krajewski, E Laukhtina, K Mori, B Pradere, L Afferi, K H Tully, S Albisinni, Y Abu Ghanem, D d'Andrea, A Mari, E Albers Acosta, R Contieri, A Cimadamore, E Grobet-Jeandin, J Gómez Rivas, C Hernández Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objective: </strong>Current upper tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC) diagnosis and disease management rely on the combination of CT Urography(CTU), cytology and ureteroscopy(URS). The limited accuracy and complications associated with these tools have led to the search for non-invasive and reliable biomarkers. Our aim was to review and analyse the existing data on the use of Bladder EpiCheck® to assess its performance as a diagnostic tool for UTUC.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A literature search on the diagnostic value of Bladder EpiCheck® as a urinary biomarker in UTUC was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus until February 2024. Pooled sensitivity(Se), specificity(Sp), negative predictive value(NPV) and positive predictive value(PPV) of the biomarker were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed through the area under the curve(AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies, including 334 patients, were included in the quantitative analysis. Bladder EpiCheck® showed promising pooled diagnostic values with Se of 0.85(95%CI 0.55-0.96), Sp of 0.93(95%CI 0.56-0.99), PPV of 0.74(95%CI 0.54-0.87) and NPV of 0.84(95%CI 0.77-0.89). The exact AUC obtained was 0.912.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bladder EpiCheck® is an effective diagnostic tool in UTUC, showing a promising diagnostic accuracy, with a Se and NPV of 85% and 84%, respectively. Its use in UTUC diagnosis and follow-up could reduce or postpone the need for more invasive procedures, such as URS, thereby reducing the procedure-associated risks and improving patients' quality of life. Although further research and large prospective studies are needed, the current results indicate that Bladder EpiCheck® is a promising tool in UTUC diagnosis, treatment decision-making, and follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":94291,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":" ","pages":"501720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2025.501720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Current upper tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC) diagnosis and disease management rely on the combination of CT Urography(CTU), cytology and ureteroscopy(URS). The limited accuracy and complications associated with these tools have led to the search for non-invasive and reliable biomarkers. Our aim was to review and analyse the existing data on the use of Bladder EpiCheck® to assess its performance as a diagnostic tool for UTUC.

Material and methods: A literature search on the diagnostic value of Bladder EpiCheck® as a urinary biomarker in UTUC was conducted through PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus until February 2024. Pooled sensitivity(Se), specificity(Sp), negative predictive value(NPV) and positive predictive value(PPV) of the biomarker were calculated. Diagnostic performance was assessed through the area under the curve(AUC).

Results: Four studies, including 334 patients, were included in the quantitative analysis. Bladder EpiCheck® showed promising pooled diagnostic values with Se of 0.85(95%CI 0.55-0.96), Sp of 0.93(95%CI 0.56-0.99), PPV of 0.74(95%CI 0.54-0.87) and NPV of 0.84(95%CI 0.77-0.89). The exact AUC obtained was 0.912.

Conclusions: Bladder EpiCheck® is an effective diagnostic tool in UTUC, showing a promising diagnostic accuracy, with a Se and NPV of 85% and 84%, respectively. Its use in UTUC diagnosis and follow-up could reduce or postpone the need for more invasive procedures, such as URS, thereby reducing the procedure-associated risks and improving patients' quality of life. Although further research and large prospective studies are needed, the current results indicate that Bladder EpiCheck® is a promising tool in UTUC diagnosis, treatment decision-making, and follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic surgery for renal tumors in patients aged 85 years and older. A paradigm shift in the surgical treatment of phimosis in pediatric patients: Is practice aligned with current recommendations? Biological and therapeutic implications of FGFR alterations in urothelial cancer: A systematic review from non-muscle-invasive to metastatic disease. Diagnostic accuracy of Bladder EpiCheck for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Robot-Assisted Transmesocolic Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy in Testicular Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: A Promising Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1