Imaging Patterns of Neonatal Subpial Hemorrhage: Provisional Statements on Neurologic Outcomes.

Santiago Martinez-Correa, Patricia Rafful, Karen Ramirez-Suarez, Angela N Viaene, Lauren A Beslow, Sonika Agarwal, Matthew T Whitehead, Arastoo Vossough, Sara Reis Teixeira
{"title":"Imaging Patterns of Neonatal Subpial Hemorrhage: Provisional Statements on Neurologic Outcomes.","authors":"Santiago Martinez-Correa, Patricia Rafful, Karen Ramirez-Suarez, Angela N Viaene, Lauren A Beslow, Sonika Agarwal, Matthew T Whitehead, Arastoo Vossough, Sara Reis Teixeira","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Subpial hemorrhage is an underrecognized type of hemorrhagic stroke primarily affecting neonates. Blood accumulation in the impermeable pia mater compresses the adjacent cortex, leading to injury. The consequences of this stroke type remain poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the association between imaging findings and neurologic outcomes at follow-up in neonates with subpial hemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively included neonates with suspected subpial hemorrhage who underwent brain MRI between January 2012 and February 2024. Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated MRIs for subpial hemorrhage location, size, and pattern using a previously described system that classified subpial hemorrhage only (pattern A), subpial hemorrhage with cortical injury (pattern B), and subpial hemorrhage with cortical injury and intraparenchymal hemorrhage (pattern C). They also assessed medullary vein engorgement/thrombosis. We extracted demographic data, perinatal events, hospital outcomes, and Alberta Infant Motor Scale scores, when available. Descriptive analysis was used for demographic, clinical, and imaging findings. The Fisher exact test evaluated associations between clinical outcomes and imaging findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients (median gestational age, 38 weeks; interquartile range, 37-39 weeks) were included, with 82% having birth weights of >2500 g. Subpial hemorrhages were most commonly on the right side (66%) and in the temporal lobe (62%). Most hemorrhages measured 1-4 cm (59%). Pattern C (15/29, 52%) was associated with delayed motor development as assessed by Alberta Infant Motor Scale (9/15, 60%) (<i>P</i> = .042), while pattern B (10/29, 35%) was associated with near-normal motor development (6/15, 40%) (<i>P</i> = .044). There was no statistically significant association between concurrent superficial and deep medullary vein engorgement/thrombosis and the presence of any neurologic deficit (<i>P</i> = .055).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The association between subpial hemorrhage patterns and neurologic outcomes, particularly motor development, may have important prognostic and management implications. In our cohort, pattern C of subpial hemorrhage showed a statistically significant association with delayed motor development. Concurrent involvement of superficial and deep medullary vessels may indicate a higher risk of poor neurologic outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of early intervention and monitoring in neonates presenting with subpial hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"1702-1708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12453492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Subpial hemorrhage is an underrecognized type of hemorrhagic stroke primarily affecting neonates. Blood accumulation in the impermeable pia mater compresses the adjacent cortex, leading to injury. The consequences of this stroke type remain poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the association between imaging findings and neurologic outcomes at follow-up in neonates with subpial hemorrhage.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively included neonates with suspected subpial hemorrhage who underwent brain MRI between January 2012 and February 2024. Two pediatric neuroradiologists evaluated MRIs for subpial hemorrhage location, size, and pattern using a previously described system that classified subpial hemorrhage only (pattern A), subpial hemorrhage with cortical injury (pattern B), and subpial hemorrhage with cortical injury and intraparenchymal hemorrhage (pattern C). They also assessed medullary vein engorgement/thrombosis. We extracted demographic data, perinatal events, hospital outcomes, and Alberta Infant Motor Scale scores, when available. Descriptive analysis was used for demographic, clinical, and imaging findings. The Fisher exact test evaluated associations between clinical outcomes and imaging findings.

Results: Twenty-nine patients (median gestational age, 38 weeks; interquartile range, 37-39 weeks) were included, with 82% having birth weights of >2500 g. Subpial hemorrhages were most commonly on the right side (66%) and in the temporal lobe (62%). Most hemorrhages measured 1-4 cm (59%). Pattern C (15/29, 52%) was associated with delayed motor development as assessed by Alberta Infant Motor Scale (9/15, 60%) (P = .042), while pattern B (10/29, 35%) was associated with near-normal motor development (6/15, 40%) (P = .044). There was no statistically significant association between concurrent superficial and deep medullary vein engorgement/thrombosis and the presence of any neurologic deficit (P = .055).

Conclusions: The association between subpial hemorrhage patterns and neurologic outcomes, particularly motor development, may have important prognostic and management implications. In our cohort, pattern C of subpial hemorrhage showed a statistically significant association with delayed motor development. Concurrent involvement of superficial and deep medullary vessels may indicate a higher risk of poor neurologic outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of early intervention and monitoring in neonates presenting with subpial hemorrhage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿脑膜下出血的影像学模式-神经学预后的临时声明。
背景和目的:脑膜下出血是一种未被充分认识的出血性卒中类型,主要影响新生儿。不可渗透的硬脑膜中的血液积聚压迫邻近的皮质,导致损伤。这种中风类型的后果仍然知之甚少。该研究旨在评估脑膜下出血新生儿随访时影像学表现与神经预后之间的关系。材料和方法:我们回顾性纳入2012年1月至2024年2月期间接受脑MRI检查的疑似脑膜下出血的新生儿。两名儿科神经放射科医生使用先前描述的系统对mri进行评估,以确定脑膜下出血的位置、大小和类型,该系统分为仅脑膜下出血(a型)、脑膜下出血合并皮质损伤(B型)和脑膜下出血合并皮质损伤和肺内出血(C型)。他们还评估了髓静脉充血/血栓形成。我们提取了人口统计数据、围产期事件、医院结果和阿尔伯塔省婴儿运动量表(AIMS)评分,如果有的话。描述性分析用于人口统计学、临床和影像学结果。Fisher的精确测试评估了临床结果和影像学结果之间的关系。结果:纳入29例患者(中位胎龄38周,IQR: 37-39), 82%的患者出生体重为bbb2500g。脑膜下出血最常见于右侧(66%)和颞叶(62%)。大多数出血量为1-4厘米(59%)。根据AIMS评估,模式C(15/ 29,52%)与运动发育延迟相关(9/ 15,60%)(p= 0.042),而模式B(10/ 29,35%)与接近正常的运动发育相关(6/ 15,40%)(p= 0.044)。并发浅、深髓静脉扩张/血栓形成与任何神经功能障碍之间无统计学意义的关联(p= 0.055)。结论:脑膜下出血类型与神经预后,特别是运动发育之间的关联可能具有重要的预后和治疗意义。在我们的队列中,C型脑膜下出血与运动发育迟缓显著相关。同时累及浅髓血管和深髓血管可能表明神经预后不良的风险较高。这些发现强调了早期干预和监测新生儿脑膜下出血的重要性。AIMS= Alberta婴儿运动量表;四分位间距;新生儿重症监护病房;SD=标准差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bleeding Patterns and Prognostic Implications in Large-Core Ischemic Stroke: Insights from the TENSION Trial. Quantitative MRA Feature Prediction of Post-Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Angiographic Vasospasm. Prone Digital Subtraction Myelography versus Dynamic CT Myelography for Detecting Definite Type 1 CSF Leak in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Improved Reliability of Resting-State Functional MRI Connectivity Using Multi-Echo Acquisition: Implications for Personalized Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Targeting. Cone-Beam CT of the Temporal Bone: Normative Linear Biometry of Inner Ear Structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1