{"title":"Legitimacy transfer: A typology for multi-system interactions in sustainability transitions","authors":"Julius Wesche, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.103958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This perspective article introduces legitimacy transfer as a novel concept within the broader framework of multi-system interaction in socio-technical transitions research. Multi-system interaction examines how resources and dynamics flow across socio-technical system boundaries, shaping transitions to sustainability. Legitimacy transfer, which is a specific form of multi-system interaction, refers to the shift of perceived legitimacy between socio-technical configurations, thereby enabling actors to strategically influence societal acceptance, mobilize resources, and attract investment. The perspective develops a typology of legitimacy transfer with three forms: legitimacy sharing, where both configurations benefit; legitimacy exchange, where legitimacy flows reciprocally with no net gain or loss; and legitimacy capture, where powerful actors attract legitimacy across system boundaries by exploiting the weaker configuration. Two empirical cases illustrate these dynamics. The first examines how oil and gas incumbents in the United States use direct air carbon capture (DAC) technology to enhance the perceived sustainability of fossil fuel products, thereby potentially deteriorating the socio-political legitimacy of the emerging DAC system. The second focuses on Norwegian oil and gas actors that are electrifying offshore rigs with renewable energy, reframing fossil fuel operations as environmentally friendly. This article advances sustainability transitions research by integrating legitimacy transfer into the study of multi-system interactions, and providing a conceptual lens through which to understand power dynamics and strategic behavior. It underscores the importance of analyzing legitimacy flows to foster equitable and effective sustainability transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 103958"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625000398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This perspective article introduces legitimacy transfer as a novel concept within the broader framework of multi-system interaction in socio-technical transitions research. Multi-system interaction examines how resources and dynamics flow across socio-technical system boundaries, shaping transitions to sustainability. Legitimacy transfer, which is a specific form of multi-system interaction, refers to the shift of perceived legitimacy between socio-technical configurations, thereby enabling actors to strategically influence societal acceptance, mobilize resources, and attract investment. The perspective develops a typology of legitimacy transfer with three forms: legitimacy sharing, where both configurations benefit; legitimacy exchange, where legitimacy flows reciprocally with no net gain or loss; and legitimacy capture, where powerful actors attract legitimacy across system boundaries by exploiting the weaker configuration. Two empirical cases illustrate these dynamics. The first examines how oil and gas incumbents in the United States use direct air carbon capture (DAC) technology to enhance the perceived sustainability of fossil fuel products, thereby potentially deteriorating the socio-political legitimacy of the emerging DAC system. The second focuses on Norwegian oil and gas actors that are electrifying offshore rigs with renewable energy, reframing fossil fuel operations as environmentally friendly. This article advances sustainability transitions research by integrating legitimacy transfer into the study of multi-system interactions, and providing a conceptual lens through which to understand power dynamics and strategic behavior. It underscores the importance of analyzing legitimacy flows to foster equitable and effective sustainability transitions.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.