{"title":"Collision avoidance strategies in autonomous vehicles and on-ramp scenario: A review","authors":"M.F. Yasak , P.M. Heerwan , V.R. Aparow","doi":"10.1016/j.arcontrol.2025.100986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Collision avoidance (CA) in autonomous vehicles (AVs) is essential for the safety and efficiency of modern transportation systems. This paper delves into various strategies and methodologies for CA, categorizing them to improve clarity and comprehension. The research primarily reviews peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings from the past five years, though notable older studies are also considered. Non-ground AVs research was excluded from this analysis. The CA strategies identified are grouped into six categories: combination of path planning and path tracking control (PP + PTC), path planning (PP), steering, braking, combination of steering and braking, and other methods. Among these, the PP + PTC strategy was the most common, used in 44 cases (38.9%), followed by PP in 16 cases (14.2%), steering in 15 cases (13.3%), other methods and combination of steering and braking in 13 cases each (11.5%), and braking in 12 cases (10.6%). Additionally, the study highlights the on-ramp scenario as an area needing more research. For this scenario, connected AVs (CAV) was the most frequently studied strategy, with 11 cases, followed by machine learning approaches with 9 cases, and other methods with 3 cases. The results underscore the importance of the PP + PTC strategy for effective CA, as it combines PP with PTC to execute planned trajectories efficiently. These insights aim to aid in developing more robust and reliable CA systems in AVs, contributing to safer and more efficient transportation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50750,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reviews in Control","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 100986"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reviews in Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136757882500001X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collision avoidance (CA) in autonomous vehicles (AVs) is essential for the safety and efficiency of modern transportation systems. This paper delves into various strategies and methodologies for CA, categorizing them to improve clarity and comprehension. The research primarily reviews peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings from the past five years, though notable older studies are also considered. Non-ground AVs research was excluded from this analysis. The CA strategies identified are grouped into six categories: combination of path planning and path tracking control (PP + PTC), path planning (PP), steering, braking, combination of steering and braking, and other methods. Among these, the PP + PTC strategy was the most common, used in 44 cases (38.9%), followed by PP in 16 cases (14.2%), steering in 15 cases (13.3%), other methods and combination of steering and braking in 13 cases each (11.5%), and braking in 12 cases (10.6%). Additionally, the study highlights the on-ramp scenario as an area needing more research. For this scenario, connected AVs (CAV) was the most frequently studied strategy, with 11 cases, followed by machine learning approaches with 9 cases, and other methods with 3 cases. The results underscore the importance of the PP + PTC strategy for effective CA, as it combines PP with PTC to execute planned trajectories efficiently. These insights aim to aid in developing more robust and reliable CA systems in AVs, contributing to safer and more efficient transportation.
期刊介绍:
The field of Control is changing very fast now with technology-driven “societal grand challenges” and with the deployment of new digital technologies. The aim of Annual Reviews in Control is to provide comprehensive and visionary views of the field of Control, by publishing the following types of review articles:
Survey Article: Review papers on main methodologies or technical advances adding considerable technical value to the state of the art. Note that papers which purely rely on mechanistic searches and lack comprehensive analysis providing a clear contribution to the field will be rejected.
Vision Article: Cutting-edge and emerging topics with visionary perspective on the future of the field or how it will bridge multiple disciplines, and
Tutorial research Article: Fundamental guides for future studies.