Systemic inequalities in road safety outcomes across high income countries and lessons from intervention approaches

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102006
Nicola Christie , Sarah Jones , Sarah E. O'Toole
{"title":"Systemic inequalities in road safety outcomes across high income countries and lessons from intervention approaches","authors":"Nicola Christie ,&nbsp;Sarah Jones ,&nbsp;Sarah E. O'Toole","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2025.102006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Road safety inequality refers to the systematic and avoidable differences in road safety exposures and health outcomes among various demographic groups, influenced by social, economic, environmental, and structural factors.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A narrative review approach was employed, integrating a systems perspective to examine the interplay of social, economic and environmental factors. Literature searches were conducted across academic databases and grey literature, over the last 15 years yielding 42 sources after applying exclusion criteria. The review was guided by research questions focusing on demographic and geographic disparities, the underlying risk factors, and the effectiveness of interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings highlight that most studies concentrate on risk factors rather than interventions. Key risk factors, especially for the young as pedestrians and cyclists, included living in hazardous built environments with high traffic levels and being more exposed to antisocial and illegal driving behaviour. For interventions the evidence suggests the need for multifaceted interventions supported by multi-agency efforts. Effective communication, community engagement, and recognition of broader systemic issues were critical for intervention success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review underscores the importance of integrating road safety within wider social and environmental strategies to maximize co-benefits. System-wide interventions targeting young pedestrians and cyclists, are recommended. Future research should address gaps in understanding the multifaceted nature of road safety inequalities and develop comprehensive, scalable interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 102006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221414052500026X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Road safety inequality refers to the systematic and avoidable differences in road safety exposures and health outcomes among various demographic groups, influenced by social, economic, environmental, and structural factors.

Method

A narrative review approach was employed, integrating a systems perspective to examine the interplay of social, economic and environmental factors. Literature searches were conducted across academic databases and grey literature, over the last 15 years yielding 42 sources after applying exclusion criteria. The review was guided by research questions focusing on demographic and geographic disparities, the underlying risk factors, and the effectiveness of interventions.

Results

Findings highlight that most studies concentrate on risk factors rather than interventions. Key risk factors, especially for the young as pedestrians and cyclists, included living in hazardous built environments with high traffic levels and being more exposed to antisocial and illegal driving behaviour. For interventions the evidence suggests the need for multifaceted interventions supported by multi-agency efforts. Effective communication, community engagement, and recognition of broader systemic issues were critical for intervention success.

Conclusions

The review underscores the importance of integrating road safety within wider social and environmental strategies to maximize co-benefits. System-wide interventions targeting young pedestrians and cyclists, are recommended. Future research should address gaps in understanding the multifaceted nature of road safety inequalities and develop comprehensive, scalable interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高收入国家道路安全结果的系统性不平等以及干预方法的经验教训
道路安全不平等是指受社会、经济、环境和结构因素影响,不同人口群体在道路安全暴露和健康结果方面存在系统性和可避免的差异。方法采用叙事回顾的方法,从系统的角度考察社会、经济和环境因素的相互作用。文献检索在学术数据库和灰色文献中进行,在应用排除标准后,在过去15年中产生42个来源。本次审查的研究问题集中在人口和地理差异、潜在风险因素和干预措施的有效性等方面。研究结果强调,大多数研究集中在风险因素而不是干预措施上。主要的风险因素,特别是对年轻人来说,包括生活在危险的建筑环境中,交通流量大,更容易受到反社会和非法驾驶行为的影响。就干预措施而言,证据表明需要由多机构努力支持的多方面干预措施。有效的沟通、社区参与和对更广泛的系统性问题的认识是干预成功的关键。报告强调了将道路安全纳入更广泛的社会和环境战略以实现共同效益最大化的重要性。建议采取针对年轻行人和骑自行车者的全系统干预措施。未来的研究应解决在理解道路安全不平等的多面性方面的差距,并制定全面、可扩展的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Exploring perceptions of the barrier effect and their associations with travel mode choice and interactions with neighbours in Santiago, Chile Motion sickness in autonomous driving: Environmental, individual, and time effects Understanding neighborhood walkability perceptions and assessment practices by community: Rural, suburban, and urban settings: A cross-sectional study Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study Pedestrian fatality in global context: Economic growth, urbanization, and the role of inequality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1