Effect of belite-rich cement on the micro/macro properties and sustainability of slag–oyster powder–cement-based ternary materials

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140460
Bo Yang , Yi Han , Zhengyi Kong , Xiao-Yong Wang
{"title":"Effect of belite-rich cement on the micro/macro properties and sustainability of slag–oyster powder–cement-based ternary materials","authors":"Bo Yang ,&nbsp;Yi Han ,&nbsp;Zhengyi Kong ,&nbsp;Xiao-Yong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Against the backdrop of global urbanization, the production of cement materials continues to increase. The need to meet development needs also raises concerns about environmental pollution. The cement industry is confronting an increasingly serious challenge of reducing carbon emissions. Using supplementary cementitious materials to replace part of the cement is a direct way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. In this study, ternary blended cement (TBC) was prepared using blast furnace slag (BFS), oyster powder (OSP), and belite-rich cement on the micro/macroscale, and ternary slag–oyster powder–cement-based materials were prepared by partially or completely replacing the Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in TBC with more environmentally belite-rich cement (BRC).The surface resistivity, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), mechanical properties of the hybrid samples were assessed through macroscopic experiments. Microscopic characterization of the samples included heat of hydration, thermogravimetric analysis (TG), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Finally, the sustainability of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per unit volume and strength of the mixed samples was assessed. The results indicate that substituting BRC for OPC can effectively reduce the cumulative hydration heat and surface resistivity of the mixed sample. At 90 d, a BRC substitution ratio of one-third yields the highest compressive strength, while complete replacement results in the lowest compressive strength. BRC substitution decreases the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per unit volume of the mixed sample. The lowest CO<sub>2</sub> emissions per unit strength occur with a one-third BRC replacement ratio, which is identified as the optimal substitution level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"468 ","pages":"Article 140460"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825006087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global urbanization, the production of cement materials continues to increase. The need to meet development needs also raises concerns about environmental pollution. The cement industry is confronting an increasingly serious challenge of reducing carbon emissions. Using supplementary cementitious materials to replace part of the cement is a direct way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. In this study, ternary blended cement (TBC) was prepared using blast furnace slag (BFS), oyster powder (OSP), and belite-rich cement on the micro/macroscale, and ternary slag–oyster powder–cement-based materials were prepared by partially or completely replacing the Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) in TBC with more environmentally belite-rich cement (BRC).The surface resistivity, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), mechanical properties of the hybrid samples were assessed through macroscopic experiments. Microscopic characterization of the samples included heat of hydration, thermogravimetric analysis (TG), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Finally, the sustainability of CO2 emissions per unit volume and strength of the mixed samples was assessed. The results indicate that substituting BRC for OPC can effectively reduce the cumulative hydration heat and surface resistivity of the mixed sample. At 90 d, a BRC substitution ratio of one-third yields the highest compressive strength, while complete replacement results in the lowest compressive strength. BRC substitution decreases the CO2 emissions per unit volume of the mixed sample. The lowest CO2 emissions per unit strength occur with a one-third BRC replacement ratio, which is identified as the optimal substitution level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富白来石水泥对矿渣-牡蛎粉-水泥基三元材料微观/宏观性能及可持续性的影响
在全球城市化的背景下,水泥材料的产量不断增加。满足发展需要也引起了对环境污染的担忧。水泥行业正面临着减少碳排放的日益严峻的挑战。使用补充胶凝材料代替部分水泥是减少二氧化碳排放的直接方法。本研究以高炉矿渣(BFS)、牡蛎粉(OSP)和富白白石水泥为微观/宏观尺度制备三元混合水泥(TBC),用更环保的富白白石水泥(BRC)部分或全部替代TBC中的普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC),制备三元矿渣-牡蛎粉-水泥基材料。通过宏观实验对复合材料的表面电阻率、超声脉冲速度(UPV)、力学性能进行了评价。样品的微观表征包括水化热、热重分析(TG)、傅里叶红外光谱(FT-IR)和x射线衍射(XRD)。最后,对混合试样单位体积CO2排放量和强度的可持续性进行了评估。结果表明,用BRC代替OPC可以有效降低混合试样的累积水化热和表面电阻率。90 d时,BRC替代率为1 / 3时抗压强度最高,而完全替代时抗压强度最低。BRC替代降低了混合样品单位体积的CO2排放量。当BRC替代率为1 / 3时,单位强度CO2排放量最低,为最佳替代水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Moisture transport in CO2-cured cement-based materials with sufficient carbonation Preparation, application, and anti-icing performance of a composite oil film-encapsulated anti-icing agent The influences of curing temperature and alite to belite ratio on the C-S-H structure characterized by X-ray diffraction Removal of free lime from thermally activated recycled cement powder using phosphoric acid modification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1