Impact of treatment and co-treatment of different types of discharges on the improvement of receiving surface water quality

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific African Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02588
Abdelillah Bouriqi , Naaila Ouazzani , Jean-François Deliège
{"title":"Impact of treatment and co-treatment of different types of discharges on the improvement of receiving surface water quality","authors":"Abdelillah Bouriqi ,&nbsp;Naaila Ouazzani ,&nbsp;Jean-François Deliège","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protecting and maintaining aquatic environments while meeting strict regulations regarding pollutant discharge into surface waters presents a significant challenge for stakeholders. This paper assesses treatment and co-treatment scenarios for different types of discharges, including urban wastewater, slaughterhouse wastewater, landfill leachate and olive mill wastewater, aimed at improving the water quality of the ZAT River in Morocco. Through a combination of field measurements and mathematical simulations, different wastewater treatment scenarios were developed and evaluated using the PEGASE model. Results from the simulations indicate that treating each effluent individually failed to meet the required COD concentration limits for discharge (&lt;250 mgO<sub>2</sub>/L) of the Moroccan standards. Furthermore, this approach fell to achieve the desired good water quality status with a COD concentration target below 35 mgO<sub>2</sub>/L in the river water quality grid. Conversely, co-treatment involving a mixt of all effluents and 1.1 % (v/v) olive mill wastewater, successfully reached the COD concentration target in the ZAT River water column. In addition, co-treatment with a 0.5 % (v/v) olive mill wastewater met both standard COD concentrations in the outlet and complied with the COD concentration limit below 35 mgO<sub>2</sub>/L in the receiving river regulations. The study shows that co-treatment is more effective than individual treatments. It also shows that maintaining discharge concentration limits in line with Moroccan standards enables the river to achieve good water quality status. This highlights the need for stricter regulations and better wastewater management to protect aquatic ecosystems. This suggests that co-treatment is a viable option in contexts where resources are limited. These results advance sustainable wastewater practices, particularly in arid regions. Promote the application of mathematical models such as PEGASE for compliance assessment and decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article e02588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625000584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protecting and maintaining aquatic environments while meeting strict regulations regarding pollutant discharge into surface waters presents a significant challenge for stakeholders. This paper assesses treatment and co-treatment scenarios for different types of discharges, including urban wastewater, slaughterhouse wastewater, landfill leachate and olive mill wastewater, aimed at improving the water quality of the ZAT River in Morocco. Through a combination of field measurements and mathematical simulations, different wastewater treatment scenarios were developed and evaluated using the PEGASE model. Results from the simulations indicate that treating each effluent individually failed to meet the required COD concentration limits for discharge (<250 mgO2/L) of the Moroccan standards. Furthermore, this approach fell to achieve the desired good water quality status with a COD concentration target below 35 mgO2/L in the river water quality grid. Conversely, co-treatment involving a mixt of all effluents and 1.1 % (v/v) olive mill wastewater, successfully reached the COD concentration target in the ZAT River water column. In addition, co-treatment with a 0.5 % (v/v) olive mill wastewater met both standard COD concentrations in the outlet and complied with the COD concentration limit below 35 mgO2/L in the receiving river regulations. The study shows that co-treatment is more effective than individual treatments. It also shows that maintaining discharge concentration limits in line with Moroccan standards enables the river to achieve good water quality status. This highlights the need for stricter regulations and better wastewater management to protect aquatic ecosystems. This suggests that co-treatment is a viable option in contexts where resources are limited. These results advance sustainable wastewater practices, particularly in arid regions. Promote the application of mathematical models such as PEGASE for compliance assessment and decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Baseline characterisation of microplastics in surface water, sediment, and seafood from the Escravos Estuary, Nigeria Some integral curves according to quasi-frame in Euclidean 3-space Impact of treatment and co-treatment of different types of discharges on the improvement of receiving surface water quality Computational fluid dynamics assessment of natural ventilation in three types of large-scale broiler poultry houses in Botswana War and its impact on farmers' crop and livestock productivity in south Wollo zone, northeastern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1