Assessing the ecology of cluster-based enterprise trust networks through percolation theory: Is your business environment trustworthy?

IF 12.5 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Technology in Society Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102839
Guanghui He, Shicheng Zhou
{"title":"Assessing the ecology of cluster-based enterprise trust networks through percolation theory: Is your business environment trustworthy?","authors":"Guanghui He,&nbsp;Shicheng Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since 2023, bank failures in America and Europe have reignited concerns about trust in credit transactions. During financial turbulence, heightened attention tends to be directed towards inter-enterprise trust management. However, existing studies have mainly focused on individual enterprise credit credibility, leaving a gap in analysing trust ecology within entire enterprise clusters. This study proposes an enterprise trust ecology assessment based on percolation theory. First, we established cluster-based enterprise trust networks (C-ETNs) and employed an entropy method to calculate the trust values of enterprise nodes. Subsequently, based on percolation theory, we mapped the trust ecology evolution to point percolation model to quantify trust ecology. Through simulations and data analysis of Chinese A-shares from 2007 to 2021, we uncovered a phase-transition phenomenon in trust ecology improvement. Trust in A-shares moderately improved, with business and comprehensive industry sectors as well as midland and west areas showing prominent improvement. However, overall trust ecology remained in early-phase transition, and almost all sectors and regions experienced upward bottlenecks. This study provides a new technical method for improving credit management in inter-enterprise transactions, thus enhancing market credit construction. Its extensive application is also valuable for economic and societal trust concerns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102839"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2023, bank failures in America and Europe have reignited concerns about trust in credit transactions. During financial turbulence, heightened attention tends to be directed towards inter-enterprise trust management. However, existing studies have mainly focused on individual enterprise credit credibility, leaving a gap in analysing trust ecology within entire enterprise clusters. This study proposes an enterprise trust ecology assessment based on percolation theory. First, we established cluster-based enterprise trust networks (C-ETNs) and employed an entropy method to calculate the trust values of enterprise nodes. Subsequently, based on percolation theory, we mapped the trust ecology evolution to point percolation model to quantify trust ecology. Through simulations and data analysis of Chinese A-shares from 2007 to 2021, we uncovered a phase-transition phenomenon in trust ecology improvement. Trust in A-shares moderately improved, with business and comprehensive industry sectors as well as midland and west areas showing prominent improvement. However, overall trust ecology remained in early-phase transition, and almost all sectors and regions experienced upward bottlenecks. This study provides a new technical method for improving credit management in inter-enterprise transactions, thus enhancing market credit construction. Its extensive application is also valuable for economic and societal trust concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过渗透理论评估基于集群的企业信任网络生态:你的商业环境值得信任吗?
自2023年以来,美国和欧洲的银行倒闭重新引发了人们对信贷交易信任的担忧。在金融动荡时期,企业间的信任管理往往受到高度关注。然而,现有的研究主要集中在单个企业的信用上,对整个企业集群的信任生态分析存在空白。本文提出了一种基于渗透理论的企业信任生态评价方法。首先,我们建立了基于集群的企业信任网络(C-ETNs),并采用熵值法计算企业节点的信任值。随后,基于渗流理论,将信任生态演化映射为点渗流模型,量化信任生态。通过2007 - 2021年中国a股的模拟和数据分析,我们发现信托生态改善存在相变现象。对a股的信任适度改善,商业和综合工业板块以及中西部地区的信任改善明显。然而,整体信任生态仍处于早期转型阶段,几乎所有行业和地区都遇到了上行瓶颈。本研究为完善企业间交易的信用管理,从而加强市场信用建设提供了一种新的技术手段。它的广泛应用对经济和社会信任问题也很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board When trust becomes a liability: Relational vulnerability and technology misappropriation in asymmetric innovation ecosystems Shining light on solar acceptance: Spatial context and question-order effects on public responses to solar placement options Embedding AI ethics in the data lifecycle: A framework for enterprise AI governance Idea readability and complexity in online user innovation communities: Effects on implementation and advocacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1