Analysis of cost-effective reduction pathways for major emitting countries to achieve the Paris Agreement climate goal

Elena Hooijschuur , Michel G.J. den Elzen , Ioannis Dafnomilis , Detlef P. van Vuuren
{"title":"Analysis of cost-effective reduction pathways for major emitting countries to achieve the Paris Agreement climate goal","authors":"Elena Hooijschuur ,&nbsp;Michel G.J. den Elzen ,&nbsp;Ioannis Dafnomilis ,&nbsp;Detlef P. van Vuuren","doi":"10.1016/j.gecadv.2025.100014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Achieving the global climate goal of the Paris Agreement depends on collective action by individual countries, as reflected in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). To inform the next NDCs to be submitted by 2025, which should include emission reduction targets for 2035/2040, this study aims to identify the reduction pathways required for major emitting economies to achieve the Paris Agreement climate targets at the lowest possible global mitigation costs. We selected least-cost mitigation scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models of the latest IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report scenario database for five major emitting economies (EU-27, China, India, Japan and the United States) and the world. We downscaled modelled regional emission pathways to the regional level for the five economies, harmonised the emission data with national inventory data, and analysed the results and assessed their robustness with respect to the methodology used. Since the results do not indicate how to account for equity and feasibility considerations, policymakers should not regard them as directly indicative of national targets. Our study shows that to keep global warming to 1.5 °C with at least 50 % probability and limited overshoot, the least-cost greenhouse gas reductions by 2040 for the EU-27, Japan and the United States are around 70 %–100 % relative to 2015 levels (including LULUCF). If the selection of scenarios is limited to those consistent with existing national targets, this range increases substantially to around 85–115 %. For China and India, ranges for both selections of scenarios are similar and around 65 %–80 % and 30 %–80 %, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100586,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change Advances","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100014"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950138525000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving the global climate goal of the Paris Agreement depends on collective action by individual countries, as reflected in the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). To inform the next NDCs to be submitted by 2025, which should include emission reduction targets for 2035/2040, this study aims to identify the reduction pathways required for major emitting economies to achieve the Paris Agreement climate targets at the lowest possible global mitigation costs. We selected least-cost mitigation scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models of the latest IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report scenario database for five major emitting economies (EU-27, China, India, Japan and the United States) and the world. We downscaled modelled regional emission pathways to the regional level for the five economies, harmonised the emission data with national inventory data, and analysed the results and assessed their robustness with respect to the methodology used. Since the results do not indicate how to account for equity and feasibility considerations, policymakers should not regard them as directly indicative of national targets. Our study shows that to keep global warming to 1.5 °C with at least 50 % probability and limited overshoot, the least-cost greenhouse gas reductions by 2040 for the EU-27, Japan and the United States are around 70 %–100 % relative to 2015 levels (including LULUCF). If the selection of scenarios is limited to those consistent with existing national targets, this range increases substantially to around 85–115 %. For China and India, ranges for both selections of scenarios are similar and around 65 %–80 % and 30 %–80 %, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of cost-effective reduction pathways for major emitting countries to achieve the Paris Agreement climate goal Afforestation on Nordic grasslands: Trade-offs and synergies for climate mitigation, biodiversity, and ecosystem services Renewable energy transition and climate finance nexus in sub-Saharan Africa Another look at ‘peak and decline’ carbon emissions countries: Which ones have decoupled per capita emissions from GDP and how? Projected global sulfur deposition with climate intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1