The battery-swapping revolution: Exploring user preferences in electric micro-mobility sector

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2025.104416
Fan Zhang , Huitao Lv , Chenchen Kuai , Tao Feng
{"title":"The battery-swapping revolution: Exploring user preferences in electric micro-mobility sector","authors":"Fan Zhang ,&nbsp;Huitao Lv ,&nbsp;Chenchen Kuai ,&nbsp;Tao Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Battery swapping services (BSS) offer innovative solutions to address the challenges of charging, safety, and battery management for electric micro-mobility vehicles (EMVs), such as electric bicycles and mopeds. However, the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for BSS among EMV users remain uncertain. This study examines consumer preferences for battery-swapping versus rechargeable EMVs within the Chinese market, identifying key factors that influence user choices. We employ a Stated Preference (SP) approach combined with a hybrid choice model (HCM) to assess both the economic viability and psychological impacts, including risk perception and social influence. Key findings demonstrate a higher willingness to pay for battery-swapping EMVs due to reduced charging time and enhanced safety features. Specifically, consumers are willing to pay an additional $2.86 for each minute reduction in facility accessibility time and an additional $27.52 for the safety features of battery-swapping EMVs. Existing users of traditional EMVs show a strong preference for BSS, willing to pay an additional $97.86. Frequent riders, who are more cost-sensitive, prefer rechargeable EMVs and are willing to reduce their expenditure by $47.95. In contrast, long-distance riders value battery endurance and are willing to pay an additional $55.96 for battery-swapping EMVs. These findings deepen our understanding of consumer behavior and provide valuable insights for policymakers and manufacturers aiming to optimize EMV adoption strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 104416"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Battery swapping services (BSS) offer innovative solutions to address the challenges of charging, safety, and battery management for electric micro-mobility vehicles (EMVs), such as electric bicycles and mopeds. However, the preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for BSS among EMV users remain uncertain. This study examines consumer preferences for battery-swapping versus rechargeable EMVs within the Chinese market, identifying key factors that influence user choices. We employ a Stated Preference (SP) approach combined with a hybrid choice model (HCM) to assess both the economic viability and psychological impacts, including risk perception and social influence. Key findings demonstrate a higher willingness to pay for battery-swapping EMVs due to reduced charging time and enhanced safety features. Specifically, consumers are willing to pay an additional $2.86 for each minute reduction in facility accessibility time and an additional $27.52 for the safety features of battery-swapping EMVs. Existing users of traditional EMVs show a strong preference for BSS, willing to pay an additional $97.86. Frequent riders, who are more cost-sensitive, prefer rechargeable EMVs and are willing to reduce their expenditure by $47.95. In contrast, long-distance riders value battery endurance and are willing to pay an additional $55.96 for battery-swapping EMVs. These findings deepen our understanding of consumer behavior and provide valuable insights for policymakers and manufacturers aiming to optimize EMV adoption strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电池交换革命:探索用户在电动微移动领域的偏好
电池交换服务(BSS)为解决电动自行车和轻便摩托车等电动微型交通工具(emv)的充电、安全和电池管理挑战提供了创新的解决方案。然而,EMV用户对BSS的偏好和支付意愿(WTP)仍然不确定。本研究调查了中国市场上消费者对电池交换和可充电电动汽车的偏好,确定了影响用户选择的关键因素。我们采用陈述偏好(SP)方法结合混合选择模型(HCM)来评估经济可行性和心理影响,包括风险感知和社会影响。主要研究结果表明,由于充电时间缩短和安全性增强,人们更愿意购买电池交换emv。具体来说,消费者愿意为每减少一分钟的设施访问时间额外支付2.86美元,并为电池交换emv的安全功能额外支付27.52美元。传统emv的现有用户对BSS表现出强烈的偏好,愿意额外支付97.86美元。常乘人士对价格比较敏感,他们更喜欢充电式电动汽车,并愿意减少47.95元的开支。相比之下,长途骑行者看重电池续航能力,愿意为换电池电动车额外支付55.96美元。这些发现加深了我们对消费者行为的理解,并为旨在优化EMV采用策略的决策者和制造商提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of the Paris 2024 Olympic Games on bicycle lane utilization with electric bike-sharing data Evaluating the carbon emission impacts of shifting to ride-pooling: A user group perspective Bilevel subsidy-enabled mobility hub network design with perturbed utility coalitional choice-based assignment Comparing delay-, distance-, and cordon-based congestion pricing strategies via large-scale simulation Do intentions translate into use? Transit market evolution and intention-behavior gaps after a new BRT service in Montreal, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1