How geopolitical tensions affect China’s systemic financial risk contagion

IF 5.5 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102366
YingXue Zhou , Da Wang , Zhengyi Nie
{"title":"How geopolitical tensions affect China’s systemic financial risk contagion","authors":"YingXue Zhou ,&nbsp;Da Wang ,&nbsp;Zhengyi Nie","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study calculates China’s net risk from the perspective of the global systemic financial risk spillover network, and constructs TVP-VAR-SV models for China to examine the time-varying effects of geopolitical exposure on aggregate systemic financial risk contagion and investigate the heterogeneous impacts across different financial submarkets. Furthermore, an innovative combination of machine learning techniques for contribution decomposition and time-varying effect analysis is introduced to identify time-varying channel effects, providing a reference for channel analysis in other studies.</div><div>The conclusions of this paper are: Firstly, geopolitical exposure has a significant and time-varying impact on systemic risk, with reaching its maximum nine months after the shock occurs. From the time dimension of the sample, the impact is the greatest during the 2012–2013 Sino-Japanese Diaoyu Islands incident. Moreover, the impact during the U.S.-China trade friction lasted for longer time. Secondly, geopolitical volatility has a heterogeneous effect on risk in different financial submarkets. In the short run, it mostly raises the risk in the equity market; in the medium run, it is the treasury market; and in the long run, it is the foreign exchange market. Thirdly, geopolitical exposures increase systemic risk spillovers through the international trade channel, the international capital flows channel, and the market sentiment channel. The capital channel has the greatest response to shocks. However, the effect of these three channels on raising risk spillovers is diminishing over time, while the effect of economic policy uncertainty is gradually increasing.</div><div>It is recommended in this paper that the department of systemic risk monitoring should add the assessment of the geopolitical situation to the risk management. In particular, foreign exchange market regulation should be strengthened during periods of geopolitical volatility to be vigilant against the possibility of long-term risks in the foreign exchange market. In terms of channels, China should develop diversified strategies. Given that the capital channel is the most dominant in terms of response strength, special efforts should be made to optimize the regulation of the capital market to enhance the resilience of China’s financial market. China should also be vigilant about the level of economic policy uncertainty and its growing impact. Finally, China should actively strengthen international cooperation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 102366"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X25000240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study calculates China’s net risk from the perspective of the global systemic financial risk spillover network, and constructs TVP-VAR-SV models for China to examine the time-varying effects of geopolitical exposure on aggregate systemic financial risk contagion and investigate the heterogeneous impacts across different financial submarkets. Furthermore, an innovative combination of machine learning techniques for contribution decomposition and time-varying effect analysis is introduced to identify time-varying channel effects, providing a reference for channel analysis in other studies.
The conclusions of this paper are: Firstly, geopolitical exposure has a significant and time-varying impact on systemic risk, with reaching its maximum nine months after the shock occurs. From the time dimension of the sample, the impact is the greatest during the 2012–2013 Sino-Japanese Diaoyu Islands incident. Moreover, the impact during the U.S.-China trade friction lasted for longer time. Secondly, geopolitical volatility has a heterogeneous effect on risk in different financial submarkets. In the short run, it mostly raises the risk in the equity market; in the medium run, it is the treasury market; and in the long run, it is the foreign exchange market. Thirdly, geopolitical exposures increase systemic risk spillovers through the international trade channel, the international capital flows channel, and the market sentiment channel. The capital channel has the greatest response to shocks. However, the effect of these three channels on raising risk spillovers is diminishing over time, while the effect of economic policy uncertainty is gradually increasing.
It is recommended in this paper that the department of systemic risk monitoring should add the assessment of the geopolitical situation to the risk management. In particular, foreign exchange market regulation should be strengthened during periods of geopolitical volatility to be vigilant against the possibility of long-term risks in the foreign exchange market. In terms of channels, China should develop diversified strategies. Given that the capital channel is the most dominant in terms of response strength, special efforts should be made to optimize the regulation of the capital market to enhance the resilience of China’s financial market. China should also be vigilant about the level of economic policy uncertainty and its growing impact. Finally, China should actively strengthen international cooperation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地缘政治紧张局势如何影响中国系统性金融风险的蔓延
本研究从全球系统性金融风险溢出网络的角度计算中国的净风险,并构建中国的tpv -var - sv模型,考察地缘政治风险暴露对总系统性金融风险传染的时变效应,以及不同金融子市场间的异质影响。此外,还创新性地将机器学习贡献分解技术与时变效应分析技术相结合,识别时变信道效应,为其他信道分析研究提供参考。本文的结论是:首先,地缘政治风险对系统性风险的影响具有显著的时变影响,并在冲击发生后的9个月达到最大。从样本的时间维度来看,2012-2013年中日钓鱼岛事件期间的影响最大。此外,中美贸易摩擦期间的影响持续时间更长。其次,地缘政治波动对不同金融子市场风险的影响具有异质性。短期来看,这主要是增加了股票市场的风险;中期来看,是美国国债市场;从长远来看,是外汇市场。第三,地缘政治风险通过国际贸易渠道、国际资本流动渠道和市场情绪渠道增加了系统性风险的溢出效应。资本渠道对冲击的反应最大。然而,随着时间的推移,这三种渠道对提高风险溢出的影响正在减弱,而经济政策不确定性的影响正在逐渐增强。建议系统风险监测部门在风险管理中增加地缘政治形势评估。特别是,在地缘政治动荡时期,要加强外汇市场的管制,警惕外汇市场出现长期风险的可能性。在渠道方面,中国应该发展多元化的战略。鉴于资本渠道在应对强度上最具优势,应特别努力优化资本市场监管,以增强中国金融市场的抗风险能力。中国还应警惕经济政策的不确定性及其日益增长的影响。最后,积极加强国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
Transparency matters: Public vs. non-public use of the counter-cyclical factor and renminbi exchange rate volatility How digital firms shape innovation networks: Evidence from corporate patent citations Early-life adversity and e-commerce adoption in old age: Evidence from China’s Great Famine Information-based resilience: Credit line disclosure as strategic response to natural disasters Innovation at crossroads: The effect of merger and acquisition on inventors’ creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1