Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1111/jar.70021
Ariella Meltzer, Emma Barnes, Ayah Wehbe
{"title":"Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia","authors":"Ariella Meltzer,&nbsp;Emma Barnes,&nbsp;Ayah Wehbe","doi":"10.1111/jar.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In Australia, several formats of written information are made for people with intellectual disability and/or low literacy, such as Easy Read, Easy English and Plain Language. More understanding is however required about the decision-making behind their features, as it is not always clear which formats use which features or for what reasons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with leaders/senior staff in Australian accessible information provider organisations who make ‘easy’ information. Data were thematically-analysed, via a two-stage deductive-inductive process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results show overlaps between different ‘easy’ information formats in Australia. ‘Easy’ information provider organisations make choices about what reading-level and images to use based <i>how</i> they see their envisioned audience <i>using</i> the information and <i>what</i> will make their envisioned audience feel <i>recognised/empowered</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>No single ‘easy’ format will suit everyone. ‘Easy’ information providers need to be more specific about the audience and associated features of their products.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In Australia, several formats of written information are made for people with intellectual disability and/or low literacy, such as Easy Read, Easy English and Plain Language. More understanding is however required about the decision-making behind their features, as it is not always clear which formats use which features or for what reasons.

Method

Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with leaders/senior staff in Australian accessible information provider organisations who make ‘easy’ information. Data were thematically-analysed, via a two-stage deductive-inductive process.

Results

The results show overlaps between different ‘easy’ information formats in Australia. ‘Easy’ information provider organisations make choices about what reading-level and images to use based how they see their envisioned audience using the information and what will make their envisioned audience feel recognised/empowered.

Conclusions

No single ‘easy’ format will suit everyone. ‘Easy’ information providers need to be more specific about the audience and associated features of their products.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
期刊最新文献
Supporting Parents of Adolescents With Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review of Interventions Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia Using Experience Based Co-Design to Develop a Novel Psychological Intervention With People With Intellectual Disabilities and Stakeholders Increased Life Expectancy of People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: What Does It Change for Parents? ‘What Matters, Doctor?’ A Qualitative and Inclusive Study of the Experience of Mainstream Healthcare Among People With Intellectual Disabilities in Belgium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1