New standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35739
Mary Beth Nierengarten
{"title":"New standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer","authors":"Mary Beth Nierengarten","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A short course of induction chemotherapy delivered immediately before chemoradiotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in comparison with the current standard of care with chemoradiotherapy alone, according to the results of the INTERLACE trial published in <i>The Lancet</i>.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>At a median follow-up of 67 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 80% for patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and 72% for patients treated with chemoradiotherapy alone, whereas the 5-year progression-free survival rates were 72% and 64%, respectively. Overall, patients who received induction therapy had a 38% lower risk of disease progression and a 40% lower risk of death than those treated with chemoradiotherapy alone.</p><p>The findings indicate a new standard of care for these patients according to the study authors, who were led by Mary McCormack, MD, a consultant clinical oncologist at the University College Hospitals NHS Trust in London.</p><p>Of critical importance is the timing of chemoradiotherapy after induction therapy to avoid any gaps in treatment. Up to 93% of patients in the study who received induction chemotherapy received it 14 days or less before chemoradiotherapy. Dr McCormack underscores the importance of ensuring that patients proceed to chemoradiotherapy immediately after induction chemotherapy (i.e., induction chemotherapy is delivered in Weeks 1–6 and is followed by radiotherapy plus cisplatin, including brachytherapy, in Weeks 7–13).</p><p>Dr McCormack stresses that induction chemotherapy did not compromise the delivery of definitive radiation, with 96% of the patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy completing the course of definitive radiation within 56 days. Prior evidence shows a higher tumor control probability when the overall radiation treatment time is less than 56 days.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>She says that radiotherapy, particularly in under-resourced settings, should be scheduled before induction chemotherapy is initiated, and she emphasizes that “the induction chemotherapy approach is not designed to manage radiotherapy wait times.”</p><p>INTERLACE is a multinational, phase 3 trial of 500 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer randomized to standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy alone (<i>n</i> = 250) or induction chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) followed by chemoradiotherapy (<i>n</i> = 250).</p><p>Commenting on the study, Elise Kohn, MD, head of Gynecologic Cancer Therapeutics in the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute, agrees that the results of the study could translate into a change in practice for treating patients with early-stage cervical cancer. As with all treatments, she emphasizes that practitioners should assess patients for signs, symptoms, and risks of this approach and engage in shared decision-making to allow patients to participate in their treatment plan and raise any concerns.</p><p>Given that hematologic toxicity, mainly neutropenia, was more common during chemoradiotherapy in patients who first received induction chemotherapy, Dr McCormack emphasizes the importance of closely monitoring patients during induction chemotherapy for hematologic toxicity and initiating treatment with growth factors when indicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35739","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A short course of induction chemotherapy delivered immediately before chemoradiotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer in comparison with the current standard of care with chemoradiotherapy alone, according to the results of the INTERLACE trial published in The Lancet.1

At a median follow-up of 67 months, the 5-year overall survival rates were 80% for patients treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and 72% for patients treated with chemoradiotherapy alone, whereas the 5-year progression-free survival rates were 72% and 64%, respectively. Overall, patients who received induction therapy had a 38% lower risk of disease progression and a 40% lower risk of death than those treated with chemoradiotherapy alone.

The findings indicate a new standard of care for these patients according to the study authors, who were led by Mary McCormack, MD, a consultant clinical oncologist at the University College Hospitals NHS Trust in London.

Of critical importance is the timing of chemoradiotherapy after induction therapy to avoid any gaps in treatment. Up to 93% of patients in the study who received induction chemotherapy received it 14 days or less before chemoradiotherapy. Dr McCormack underscores the importance of ensuring that patients proceed to chemoradiotherapy immediately after induction chemotherapy (i.e., induction chemotherapy is delivered in Weeks 1–6 and is followed by radiotherapy plus cisplatin, including brachytherapy, in Weeks 7–13).

Dr McCormack stresses that induction chemotherapy did not compromise the delivery of definitive radiation, with 96% of the patients who were treated with induction chemotherapy completing the course of definitive radiation within 56 days. Prior evidence shows a higher tumor control probability when the overall radiation treatment time is less than 56 days.2

She says that radiotherapy, particularly in under-resourced settings, should be scheduled before induction chemotherapy is initiated, and she emphasizes that “the induction chemotherapy approach is not designed to manage radiotherapy wait times.”

INTERLACE is a multinational, phase 3 trial of 500 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer randomized to standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy alone (n = 250) or induction chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) followed by chemoradiotherapy (n = 250).

Commenting on the study, Elise Kohn, MD, head of Gynecologic Cancer Therapeutics in the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program at the National Cancer Institute, agrees that the results of the study could translate into a change in practice for treating patients with early-stage cervical cancer. As with all treatments, she emphasizes that practitioners should assess patients for signs, symptoms, and risks of this approach and engage in shared decision-making to allow patients to participate in their treatment plan and raise any concerns.

Given that hematologic toxicity, mainly neutropenia, was more common during chemoradiotherapy in patients who first received induction chemotherapy, Dr McCormack emphasizes the importance of closely monitoring patients during induction chemotherapy for hematologic toxicity and initiating treatment with growth factors when indicated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期子宫颈癌患者的新护理标准
根据发表在《柳叶刀》上的INTERLACE试验的结果,在放化疗之前立即进行短期诱导化疗,与目前单独放化疗的标准治疗相比,显著提高了局部晚期宫颈癌患者的无进展生存期和总生存期。诱导化疗后放化疗患者的5年总生存率为80%,单独放化疗患者的5年总生存率为72%,而5年无进展生存率分别为72%和64%。总的来说,接受诱导治疗的患者比单独接受放化疗的患者疾病进展风险低38%,死亡风险低40%。这项研究的作者是玛丽·麦科马克医学博士,她是伦敦大学学院医院NHS信托基金会的临床肿瘤学顾问。研究结果表明,对这些患者的护理有了新的标准。最重要的是诱导治疗后放化疗的时机,以避免治疗中的任何间隙。在接受诱导化疗的研究中,高达93%的患者在放化疗前14天或更短时间内接受了诱导化疗。McCormack博士强调了确保患者在诱导化疗后立即进行放化疗的重要性(即,诱导化疗在第1-6周进行,然后在第7-13周进行放疗加顺铂,包括近距离放疗)。McCormack博士强调,诱导化疗并不影响最终放疗,96%接受诱导化疗的患者在56天内完成了最终放疗。先前的证据表明,当总放射治疗时间小于56天时,肿瘤控制的可能性更高。她说,放射治疗,特别是在资源不足的地区,应该在诱导化疗开始之前安排,她强调“诱导化疗方法不是为了管理放疗等待时间而设计的。”INTERLACE是一项多国iii期临床试验,纳入500例局部晚期宫颈癌患者,随机分为标准顺铂基础放化疗组(n = 250)或诱导化疗组(卡铂和紫杉醇)后放化疗组(n = 250)。国家癌症研究所癌症治疗评估项目妇科癌症治疗学负责人Elise Kohn医学博士对这项研究进行了评论,她同意这项研究的结果可以转化为治疗早期宫颈癌患者的实践变化。对于所有的治疗方法,她强调从业者应该评估患者的体征、症状和这种方法的风险,并参与共同决策,让患者参与到他们的治疗计划中,并提出任何担忧。鉴于血液毒性(主要是中性粒细胞减少)在首次接受诱导化疗的患者放化疗期间更为常见,McCormack博士强调在诱导化疗期间密切监测患者血液毒性的重要性,并在有指示时开始使用生长因子治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Integration of food and nutrition into oncology care: Proceedings of the Food is Medicine in Oncology Care Symposium. Sex differences in the clinical presentation of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Issue Information Exercise recommendations for older adults living with and beyond cancer: A consensus statement by the Advancing Capacity to Integrate Exercise Into the Care of Older Cancer Survivors expert panel Efficacy and safety of teclistamab in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Pooled findings from three clinical cohorts and a retrospective cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1